CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 41

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Surface facial modelling and allometry in relation to sexual dimorphism

Velemínská, J., Bigoni, L., Krajíček, V., Borský, J., Šmahelová, D., Cagáňová, V., Peterka, M.·2012·HOMO
DOI 10.1016/j.jchb.2012.02.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Sexual dimorphism is responsible for a substantial part of human facial variability, the study of which is essential for many scientific fields ranging from evolution to special biomedical topics. Our aim was to analyse the relationship between size variability and shape facial variability of sexual traits in the young adult Central European population and to construct average surface models of adult males and females. The method of geometric morphometrics allowed not only the identification of dimorphic traits, but also the evaluation of static allometry and the visualisation of sexual facial differences. Facial variability in the studied sample was characterised by a strong relationship between facial size and shape of sexual dimorphic traits. Large size of face was associated with facial elongation and vice versa. Regarding shape sexual dimorphic traits, a wide, vaulted and high forehead in combination with a narrow and gracile lower face were typical for females. Variability in shape dimorphic traits was smaller in females compared to males. For female classification, shape sexual dimorphic traits are more important, while for males the stronger association is with face size. Males generally had a closer inter-orbital distance and a deeper position of the eyes in relation to the facial plane, a larger and wider straight nose and nostrils, and more massive lower face. Using pseudo-colour maps to provide a detailed schematic representation of the geometrical differences bet…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jchb.2012.02.002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Baik, 2007, Facial soft-tissue analysis of Korean adults with normal occlusion using a 3-dimensional laser scanner, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 133, 612
  2. Bigoni, 2010, Three-dimensional geometric morphometric analysis of cranio-facial sexual dimorphism in a Central European sample of known sex, HOMO, 61, 16, 10.1016/j.jchb.2009.09.004 · DOI
  3. Bishara, 1984, Changes in facial dimensions and relationships between the ages of 5 and 25 years, Am. J. Orthod., 85, 238, 10.1016/0002-9416(84)90063-0 · DOI
  4. Božič, 2009, Facial morphology of Slovenian and Welsh white populations using 3-dimensional imaging, Angle Orthod., 79, 640, 10.2319/081608-432.1 · DOI
  5. Budai, 2003, Relation between anthropometric and cephalometric measurements and proportions of the face of healthy young white adult men and women, J. Craniofac. Surg., 14, 154, 10.1097/00001665-200303000-00004 · DOI
  6. Bulygina, 2006, Ontogeny of facial dimorphism and patterns of individual development within one human population, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 131, 432, 10.1002/ajpa.20317 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Carlson, 1977, Masticatory function and post-Pleistocene evolution in Nubia, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 46, 495, 10.1002/ajpa.1330460316 · DOI
  8. Çelbiş, 2001, Sexual diagnosis of the glabellar region, Leg. Med., 3, 162, 10.1016/S1344-6223(01)00025-6 · DOI
  9. Cheverud, 1982, Phenotypic, genetic, and environmental morphological integration in the cranium, Evolution, 36, 499, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05070.x · DOI
  10. Cooper, 1989, Nasorespiratory function and orofacial development, Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am., 22, 413, 10.1016/S0030-6665(20)31448-1 · DOI
  11. Da Silveira, 2003, Craniofacial applications of three-dimensional laser surface scanning, J. Craniofac. Surg., 14, 449, 10.1097/00001665-200307000-00009 · DOI
  12. Evison, 2010, Key parameters of face shape variation in 3D in a large sample, J. Forensic Sci., 55, 159, 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01213.x · DOI
  13. Fanghänel, 2006, The face-physiognomic expressiveness and human identity, Ann. Anat., 188, 261, 10.1016/j.aanat.2005.11.013 · DOI
  14. Farkas, 1992, Growth and development of regional units in the head and face based on anthropometric measurements, Cleft Palate Cran. J., 29, 301, 10.1597/1545-1569(1992)029<0301:GADORU>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  15. Ferrario, 1993, Craniofacial morphometry by photographic evaluations, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 103, 327, 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70013-E · DOI
  16. Ferrario, 1998, Facial volume changes during normal human growth and development, Anat. Rec., 250, 480, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(199804)250:4<480::AID-AR12>3.0.CO;2-K · DOI
  17. Ferrario, 1999, Soft tissue facial growth and development as assessed by the three-dimensional computerized mesh diagram analysis, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 116, 215, 10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70220-9 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Ferrario, 2000, Normal growth and development of the lips: a 3-dimensional study from 6 years to adulthood using a geometric model, J. Anat., 196, 415, 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19630415.x · DOI
  19. Fink, 2005, Second to fourth digit ratio and face shape, Proc. Biol. Sci., 272, 1995, 10.1098/rspb.2005.3179 · DOI
  20. Franklin, 2006, A geometric morphometric study of sexual dimorphism in the crania of indigenous southern Africans, S. Afr. J. Sci., 102, 229
  21. Franklin, 2006, Determination of sex in South African blacks by discriminant function analysis of mandibular linear dimensions. A preliminary investigation using the Zulu local population, Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol., 2, 263, 10.1385/FSMP:2:4:263 · DOI
  22. Genecov, 1990, Development of the nose and soft tissue profile, Angle Orthod., 60, 191
  23. Gonzalez, 2011, Ontogenetic allometry and cranial shape diversification among human populations from South America, Anat. Rec., 294, 1864, 10.1002/ar.21454 · DOI
  24. Halazonetis, 2007, Morphometric evaluation of soft-tissue profile shape, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 131, 481, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.06.031 · DOI
  25. Hennessy, 2002, 3D laser surface scanning and geometric morphometric analysis of craniofacial shape as an index of cerebro-craniofacial morphogenesis: initial application to sexual dimorphism, Biol. Psychiatry, 51, 507, 10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01327-0 · DOI
  26. Hennessy, 2005, Facial surface analysis by 3D laser scanning and geometric morphometrics in relation to sexual dimorphism in cerebral-craniofacial morphogenesis and cognitive function, J. Anat., 207, 283, 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00444.x · DOI
  27. Hutton, 2003, Estimating average growth trajectories in shape-space using kernel smoothing, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 22, 747, 10.1109/TMI.2003.814784 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Kiliaridis, 1986, The relationship between masticatory muscle function and cranial morphology: I. A cephalometric longitudinal analysis in the growing rat fed a soft diet, Eur. J. Orthod., 7, 273, 10.1093/ejo/7.4.273 · DOI
  29. Kimmerle, 2008, Sexual dimorphism in America: geometric morphometric analysis of the craniofacial region, J. Forensic Sci., 53, 54, 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00627.x · DOI
  30. Lieberman, 1995, Testing hypotheses about recent human evolution from skulls: integrating morphology, function, development and phylogeny, Curr. Anthropol., 36, 159, 10.1086/204348 · DOI
  31. Lieberman, 2000, Basicranial influence on overall cranial shape, J. Hum. Evol., 38, 291, 10.1006/jhev.1999.0335 · DOI
  32. Lutchmaya, 2004, 2nd to 4th digit ratios, fetal testosterone and estradiol, Early Hum. Dev., 77, 23, 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2003.12.002 · DOI
  33. Mendelson, 2007, Age-related changes of the orbit and midcheek and the implications for facial rejuvenation, Aesthetic Plast. Surg., 31, 419, 10.1007/s00266-006-0120-x · DOI
  34. Nagasao, 2007, Analysis of the orbital floor morphology, J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg., 35, 112, 10.1016/j.jcms.2006.12.002 · DOI
  35. Pretorius, 2006, Investigation into the usability of geometric morphometric analysis in assessment of sexual dimorphism, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 129, 64, 10.1002/ajpa.20251 · DOI
  36. Rosas, 2002, Thin-plate spline analysis of allometry and sexual dimorphism in the human craniofacial complex, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 117, 236, 10.1002/ajpa.10023 · DOI
  37. Sawyer, 2009, 3D Stereophotogrammetry quantitative lip analysis, Aesthetic Plast. Surg., 33, 497, 10.1007/s00266-008-9191-1 · DOI
  38. Schaefer, 2009, Does geometric morphometrics serve the needs of plasticity research?, J. Biosci., 34, 589, 10.1007/s12038-009-0076-5 · DOI
  39. Schiwy-Bochat, 2001, The roughness of the supranasal region – a morphological sex trait, Forensic Sci. Int., 117, 7, 10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00434-5 · DOI
  40. Simpson, 2002, Variation in soft tissue thicknesses on the human face and their relation to craniometric dimensions, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 118, 121, 10.1002/ajpa.10073 · DOI
  41. Singh, 1999, Finite-element morphometry of soft tissue morphology in subjects with untreated Class III malocclusions, Angle Orthod., 69, 215
  42. Singh, 2003, Effects of the headgear-activator Teuscher appliance in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion: a geometric morphometric study, Orthod. Craniofac. Res., 6, 88, 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2003. c245.x · DOI
  43. Slatkin, 1984, Ecological causes of sexual dimorphism, Evolution, 38, 622, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00327.x · DOI
  44. Šmahel, 1998, Basic characteristics of the postnatal development of the human cranium, Anthropologie, 36, 235
  45. Spiegel, 2011, Facial determinants of female gender and feminizing forehead cranioplasty, Laryngoscope, 121, 250, 10.1002/lary.21187 · DOI
  46. Stephan, 2005, Does sexual dimorphism in facial soft tissue depths justify sex distinction in craniofacial identification?, J. Forensic Sci., 50, 513, 10.1520/JFS2004251 · DOI
  47. Stephan, 2008, Facial soft tissue depths in craniofacial identification (Part I): an analytical review of the published adult data, J. Forensic Sci., 53, 1257, 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00852.x · DOI
  48. Toma, 2008, A three-dimensional look for facial differences between males and females in a British-Caucasian sample aged 151/2 years old, Orthod. Craniofac. Res., 11, 180, 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2008.00428.x · DOI
  49. Ursi, 1993, Sexual dimorphism in normal craniofacial growth, Angle Orthod., 63, 47
  50. Warren, 1987, The relationship between nasal airway cross-sectional area and nasal resistance, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., 92, 390, 10.1016/0889-5406(87)90259-9 · DOI
  51. Weisensee, 2011, Secular changes in craniofacial morphology of the Portuguese using geometric morphometrics, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 145, 548, 10.1002/ajpa.21531 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 41

Metadata

Authors
Velemínská, J., Bigoni, L., Krajíček, V., Borský, J., Šmahelová, D., Cagáňová, V., & Peterka, M.
Venue
HOMO
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-04
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
81-93
ISSN
0018-442X
DOI
10.1016/j.jchb.2012.02.002
Cited by
41
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review