The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ontogeny of facial dimorphism and patterns of individual development within one human population
Abstract
Based on a longitudinal study of radiographs of the Denver Growth Study, we investigated the morphological development of individual and gender differences in the anterior neurocranium, face, and basicranium. In total, 500 X‐rays of 14 males and 14 females, each with 18 landmarks and semilandmarks, were digitized and analyzed using geometric morphometric methods. Sexual dimorphism in shape and form is already present at the earliest age stage included in the analysis. However, the nature of dimorphism changes with age. Four factors apper to contribute to cranial sexual dimorphism in human postnatal development: 1) initial, possibly prenatal, differences in shape; 2) differences in the association of size and shape; 3) male hypermorphosis; and 4) some degree of difference in the direction of male and female growth trajectories. Studying changes in individuals, we find a low correlation between newborn and adult morphology, while 3‐year‐olds already show a high correlation with their adult form. We conclude that the adult pattern of interindividual difference in facial form in a single human population is established within the first few years of life. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bulygina et al. [51] reported a significant decline in the rate of growth at approximately 13 years of age and a cessation of growth at about 15 years of age.
“Bulygina et al. [51] also reported a significant decline in the rate of growth at approximately 13 years of age and a cessation of growth at about 15 years of age.”
From Simulation of facial growth based on longitudinal data: Age progression and age regression between 7 and 17 years of age using 3D surface data (2019) · cites this paper as [51]
In Bulygina et al.'s study, the divergence mainly concerns the change of shape; the magnitude of shape change per size change seems similar between the sexes.
“This divergence mainly concerns the change of shape; the magnitude of shape change per size change seems to be similar between the sexes in their study.”
From Simulation of facial growth based on longitudinal data: Age progression and age regression between 7 and 17 years of age using 3D surface data (2019) · cites this paper as [51]
The divergence in facial growth patterns was closely connected with the onset of puberty, which occurs about two years earlier in girls.
“The divergence in facial growth patterns was closely connected with the onset of puberty, which occurs about two years earlier in girls [28,51].”
From Simulation of facial growth based on longitudinal data: Age progression and age regression between 7 and 17 years of age using 3D surface data (2019) · cites this paper as [51]
The process of facial development varies in different phases of human life.
“The process of facial development varies in different phases of the human life [51–56], so it is necessary to construct age progression models for specific periods.”
From Simulation of facial growth based on longitudinal data: Age progression and age regression between 7 and 17 years of age using 3D surface data (2019) · cites this paper as [51]
Bulygina et al. [51] found that male and female growth trajectories are not always parallel but undergo some degree of divergence after age about 12 years.
“Bulygina et al. [51] similarly found that male and female growth trajectories are not always parallel but undergo some degree of divergence after the age of about 12 years.”
From Simulation of facial growth based on longitudinal data: Age progression and age regression between 7 and 17 years of age using 3D surface data (2019) · cites this paper as [51]
Citations
Cites
Extensions of the procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks
Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. (1990) · Systematic Zoology · doi:10.2307/2992207 · Cited by 4,289
Viðarsdóttir, U. S., O'Higgins, P., & Stringer, C. (2002) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00092.x · Cited by 274
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 63
- Aiello L, 1990, Human evolutionary anatomy
- 10.1176/ajp.150.1.130 · DOI
- 10.1016/0160-2896(92)90013-H · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1980.tb04061.x · DOI
- Blatter DD, 1995, Quantitative volumetric‐analysis of brain MR—normative database spanning 5 decades of life, Am J Neuroradiol, 16, 241
- Bookstein FL, 1991, Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology
- 10.1016/S1361-8415(97)85012-8 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(19991215)257:6<217::AID-AR7>3.0.CO;2-W · DOI
- 10.1016/S0047-2484(02)00201-4 · DOI
- Broadbent BHS, 1975, Bolton standards of dentofacial developmental growth
- 10.1002/jez.b.21005 · DOI
- 10.1597/1545-1569(2000)037<0145:TDBBGS>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.410040410 · DOI · Paper page
- Dryden IL, 1998, Statistical shape analysis
- 10.1093/genetics/57.1.79 · DOI
- Enlow DH, 1990, Facial growth
- Ewing SK, 2000, Craniofacial growth of Dutch‐Americans: a longitudinal craniometric study, J Dent Res, 79, 1468
- 10.1006/jhev.1998.0273 · DOI
- 10.1093/cercor/4.4.344 · DOI
- 10.1093/ejo/19.6.681 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4757-3235-1 · DOI
- Gunz P, 2004, Modern morphometrics in physical anthropology, 73
- 10.1017/S0033291700027847 · DOI
- Herbert JG, 1979, The inheritance of growth and form in the mouse. IV. Changes in the variance components of weight, tail length and tail width during growth, Growth, 43, 36
- Hingst‐Zaher E, 2000, Application of geometric morphometrics to the study of postnatal size and shape changes of the skull of Calomys expulsus, Hystrix, 11, 99
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199801)105:1<57::AID-AJPA6>3.0.CO;2-A · DOI
- 10.1002/ajpa.20035 · DOI
- 10.2307/2533879 · DOI
- 10.1006/jhev.1998.0287 · DOI
- 10.1002/1096-8644(2000)43:31 <117::AID-AJPA5>3.3.CO;2-9 · DOI
- Maresh MM, 1948, Growth of the heart related to the bodily growth during childhood and adolescence, Pediatrics, 2, 382, 10.1542/peds.2.4.382 · DOI
- 10.1001/archpedi.1938.01980130042004 · DOI
- McCammon R, 1970, Human growth and development
- 10.1006/jhev.2000.0446 · DOI
- Merow WW, 1990, Facial growth, 346
- 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.03.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0940-9602(04)80085-2 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2005.05027.x · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4687(199701)231:1<53::AID-JMOR5>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI
- 10.1006/jhev.1993.1014 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1998.19320251.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1990.tb04041.x · DOI
- 10.1017/S095283690100084X · DOI
- 10.1159/000142510 · DOI
- 10.1001/archneur.1994.00540210046012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF02547620 · DOI
- Richtsmeier JT, 1989, Sexual dimorphism of facial growth in Macaca mulatta and M. fascicularis, Fortschr Zool, 35, 438
- 10.1093/sysbio/42.3.307 · DOI
- Rohlf FJ, 1995, Multivariate analysis of shape using partial‐wrap scores, 154
- 10.1002/ajpa.10023 · DOI
- Ross CF, 1995, Basicranial flexion, relative brain size and facial kyphosis in Homo sapiens and some fossil hominids, Am J Orthod, 98, 575
- 10.1002/ajpa.1330910306 · DOI
- 10.2527/jas1972.355911x · DOI
- Scheuer L, 2000, Developmental juvenile osteology
- Shea B, 1981, Relative growth of the craniofacial complex in the African apes, Am J Phys Anthropol, 54
- 10.1002/ajpa.1330620307 · DOI
- Ursi WJS, 1993, Sexual dimorphism in normal craniofacial growth, Angle Orthod, 63, 47
- VidarsdottirUS.1999.Changes in the form of the facial skeleton during growth: a comparative morphometric study of modern humans and Neanderthals. Unpublished PhD Thesis University of London.
- Vidarsdottir US, 2001, Development of sexual dimorphism in the facial skeleton of anatomically modern Homo sapiens, Am J Phys Anthropol, 32, 144
- 10.1159/000145754 · DOI
- 10.1016/0160-2896(91)90031-8 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb00626.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00568.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, Y., & Kosinski, M. (2018) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000098 · Cited by 766
Neubauer, S., Gunz, P., & Hublin, J.-J. (2010) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.06.011 · Cited by 199
Windhager, S., Mitteroecker, P., Rupić, I., Lauc, T., Polašek, O., & Schaefer, K. (2019) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.23878 · Cited by 128
Evaluating developmental shape changes in Homo antecessor subadult facial morphology
Freidline, S. E., Gunz, P., Harvati, K., & Hublin, J.-J. (2013) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.07.012 · Cited by 59
Koudelová, J., Hoffmannová, E., Dupej, J., & Velemínská, J. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212618 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Bulygina, E., Mitteroecker, P., & Aiello, L.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-04-04
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 432-443
- ISSN
- 0002-9483
- 1096-8644
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
