Cited by 43Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Central and peripheral determinants of exercise capacity in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction

Open access
Wolsk, Emil, Kaye, David, Komtebedde, Jan, Shah, Sanjiv J., Borlaug, Barry A., Burkhoff, Daniel, Kitzman, Dalane W., Lam, Carolyn S.P. +6 more·2019·JACC Heart Failure

Abstract

Objectives This study sought to discern which central (e.g., heart rate, stroke volume [SV], filling pressure) and peripheral factors (e.g., oxygen use by skeletal muscle, body mass index [BMI]) during exercise were most strongly associated with the presence of heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) as compared with healthy control subjects exercising at the same workload.Background The underlying mechanisms limiting exercise capacity in patients with HFpEF are not fully understood.Methods In patients with HFpEF (n = 108), the hemodynamic response at peak exercise was measured using right-sided heart catheterization and was compared with that in healthy control subjects (n = 42) at matched workloads to reveal hemodynamic differences that were not attributable to the workload performed. The patients studied were prospectively included in the REDUCE-LAP HF (Reduce Elevated Left Atrial Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure) trials and HemReX (Effect of Age on the Hemodynamic Response During Rest and Exercise in Healthy Humans) study. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to analyze variables associated with HFpEF versus control subjects.Results Compared with healthy control subjects, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and SV were the only independent hemodynamic variables that were associated with HFpEF, a finding explaining 66% (p < 0.0001) of the difference between the groups. When relevant baseline characteristics were added to the base model, only BMI emerged as an additional independent variable, in total explaining of 90% of the differences between groups (p < 0.0001): PCWP (47%), BMI (31%), and SV (12%).Conclusions The study identified 3 key variables (PCWP, BMI, and SV) that independently correlate with the presence of patients with HFpEF compared with healthy control subjects exercising at the same workload. Therapies that decrease left-sided heart filling pressures could improve exercise capacity and possibly prognosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.01.006

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exercise intolerance is due to a combination of central factors such as heart rate and stroke volume as well as peripheral factors including skeletal muscle structure and function.

    “Exercise intolerance is due to a combination of central factors such as heart rate and stroke volume as well as peripheral factors including skeletal muscle structure and function (Figure 2 ), 32 , 33 , 34”

    From Prioritizing symptom management in the treatment of chronic heart failure (2020) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) identifies heart rate and stroke volume as central factors and skeletal-muscle oxygen utilization as a peripheral factor in HFpEF exercise intolerance. The Exercise-limiting factors section also suggests reduced skeletal-muscle oxygen extraction may contribute. The copy does not establish a role for skeletal-muscle structure, and it describes the mechanisms as incompletely understood rather than definitively explaining exercise intolerance. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Brubaker PH, Kitzman DW. Chronotropy: the Cinderella of heart failure pathophysiology and management. JACC Heart Fail. 2013;1:267-269.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolsk, E., Kaye, D., Komtebedde, J., Shah, S. J., Borlaug, B. A., Burkhoff, D., Kitzman, D. W., Lam, C. S. P., van Veldhuisen, D. J., Ponikowski, P., Petrie, M. C., Hassager, C., Møller, J. E., & Gustafsson, F.
Affiliations
  • Rigshospitalet (DK)
  • Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Cardiovascular Research Foundation (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Wroclaw Medical University (PL)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • Odense University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Wolsk, Emil
Venue
JACC Heart Failure
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
321-332
ISSN
2213-1779 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2920988382
Cited by
43
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5
FWCI
10.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JACC Heart Failure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca (R01 HL107577, R01 HL140731, R01 HL127028)
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
  • Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Incorporated
  • MyoKardia
  • Abiomed
  • Lundbeckfonden (R186-2015-2132)
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Astellas Pharma
  • Servier
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (RO1 HL128526, HL107577, R01HL128526, R01HL127028, U10HL110262, HL128526, R01HL140731, R01HL107577)
  • Daiichi Sankyo Europe
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Keywords
heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, exercise capacity, exercise hemodynamics, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, stroke volume, body mass index, left atrial filling pressure, right heart catheterization
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Double-Blind Method, Exercise Test, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Cardiac Catheterization, Heart Failure, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Pulmonary Wedge Pressure, Stroke Volume, Exercise Tolerance, Young Adult, Atrial Pressure, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review