Cited by 189Traditional Chinese Medicine AnalysisPhytochemistry and Biological ActivitiesChromatography in Natural Products

Identification and characterization of major flavonoids and caffeoylquinic acids in three Compositae plants by LC/DAD-APCI/MS

Lai, Jia-Ping, Lim, Yew Heng, Su, Jin, Shen, Han-Ming, Ong, Choon Nam·2007·Journal of Chromatography B

Abstract

In this study, a liquid chromatography/diode array detector-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization/mass spectrometry (LC/DAD-APCI/MS) was successfully developed to identify and characterize the main flavonoids and caffeoylquinic acids (CQAs) of three common Compositae plants (Chrysanthemum morifolium Raman, Artemisia annua, and Chrysanthemum coronarium) which have been used as herbal medicine. Identifications were performed by comparing the retention time, UV and mass spectra of samples with standards or/and earlier publications. The crude methanolic extracts of these plants were assayed directly using LC/MS without any further pretreatment. The proposed method is rapid and reproducible and is useful for characterization and evaluation of different plant flavonoids and CQAs. A total of 41 different flavonoids and 6 CQAs were identified and confirmed by APCI-MS. The main components of three Compositae plants were also compared. Although there exist some similarities in the flavonoidic content of the leaf and flower of C. morifolium, significant variations in their varieties and concentrations were observed. Artemisia annua processes substantial amount of alkylated derivatives of flavones and Chrysanthemum coronarium contains only CQAs. These findings suggest that although all the plants studied are from the same Compositae family, their flavonoids and phenolic compositions are markedly different. The proposed method is useful for further chromatographic fingerprinting of pla…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.10.028

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lai, J.-P., Lim, Y. H., Su, J., Shen, H.-M., & Ong, C. N.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
Ong, Choon Nam
Venue
Journal of Chromatography B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-04
Volume
848
Issue
2
Pages
215-225
ISSN
1570-0232 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094457901
Cited by
189
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 9
FWCI
14.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Chromatography B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry and Biological Activities
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Chromatography in Natural Products
Keywords
flavonoids, caffeoylquinic acids, Asteraceae, Chrysanthemum morifolium, Artemisia annua, Chrysanthemum coronarium, herbal medicine, methanol extract, flavonoid profiling, chromatographic fingerprint, phenolic composition
MeSH terms
Atmospheric Pressure, Chromatography, Liquid, Flavonoids, Plant Extracts, Quinic Acid, Mass Spectrometry, Reproducibility of Results, Molecular Structure, Asteraceae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review