Cited by 19Chromatography in Natural ProductsPhytochemical Studies and BioactivitiesMedicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds

Centrifugal partition chromatography in the isolation of minor ecdysteroids from Cyanotis arachnoidea

Issaadi, Halima Meriem, Tsai, Yu-Chi, Chang, Fang-Rong, Hunyadi, Attila·2017·Journal of Chromatography B

Abstract

Phytoecdysteroids are known for their various beneficial bioactivities in mammals including a non-hormonal anabolic and adaptogenic effect. Cyanotis arachnoidea extracts are extensively utilized worldwide as ecdysteroid-rich materials for various purposes, e.g. food supplementation, use in agriculture and aquaculture, etc. Preparative chromatography of ecdysteroids requires extensive use of methods of different selectivity, and only a very limited number of papers are available on related application of modern liquid-liquid chromatographic techniques. In this work, a centrifugal partition chromatography (CPC) method was developed for the isolation of two minor ecdysteroids, dacryhainansterone and calonysterone, from a pre-purified commercial extract of Cyanotis arachnoidea. The biphasic solvent system was optimized by HPLC, and was composed of n-hexane - ethyl acetate - methanol - water (1:5:1:5, v/v/v/v). The isolated dacryhainansterone and calonysterone represented 99.1% and 99.7% purity, respectively. Calonysterone exerts a stronger effect on the protein kinase B (Akt) phosphorylation in mammalian skeletal muscle cells than the abundant 20-hydroxyecdysone, while no related data are available on dacryhainansterone. Despite their presence in food supplements, neither compound has appropriately been assessed for safety and efficacy. The reported method allows the gram scale isolation of these compounds, opening ways to their in-depth pharmacological investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jchromb.2017.03.043

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 19

Authors
Issaadi, H. M., Tsai, Y.-C., Chang, F.-R., & Hunyadi, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Szeged (HU)
  • Kaohsiung Medical University (TW)
  • National Sun Yat-sen University (TW)
Corresponding author
Hunyadi, Attila
Venue
Journal of Chromatography B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
1054
Pages
44-49
ISSN
1570-0232 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2604372067
Cited by
19
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Chromatography B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SZTE Publicatio Repozitórium (University of Szeged) (acceptedVersion)
  • Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Chromatography in Natural Products
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Phytochemical Studies and Bioactivities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds
Keywords
centrifugal partition chromatography, phytoecdysteroids, Cyanotis arachnoidea, preparative isolation, dietary supplements, Akt phosphorylation, 20-hydroxyecdysone, skeletal muscle
MeSH terms
Acetates, Methanol, Centrifugation, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Hexanes, Plant Extracts, Solvents, Ecdysteroids, Commelinaceae, Chromatography, Reverse-Phase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review