Cited by 131Sustainable Development and Environmental ManagementSustainable Supply Chain ManagementEnvironmental Sustainability in Business

The European Commission's sustainable consumption and production and sustainable industrial policy action plan

Nash, Hazel Ann·2009·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.08.020

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nash, H. A.
Affiliations
Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
Nash, Hazel Ann
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
496-498
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002216570
Cited by
131
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
22.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
Keywords
sustainable consumption and production, sustainable industrial policy, European Commission action plan, EU Sustainable Development Strategy, decoupling economic growth from resource use, environmental performance of products, consumer behavior, producer behavior, multi-level governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review