The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental impacts of biogas deployment – Part II: life cycle assessment of multiple production and utilization pathways
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making
Wang, J.-J., Jing, Y.-Y., Zhang, C.-F., & Zhao, J.-H. (2009) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021 · Cited by 2,346
Indicated, N. (2010) · Joint Research Centre (European Commission) · doi:10.2788/38479 · Cited by 1,038
The Eco-indicator 99 A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methodology Report
Goedkoop, M. J. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,022
Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways
Pöschl, M., Ward, S., & Owende, P. (2010) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.05.011 · Cited by 783
Self-citationLife cycle assessment Part 2: Current impact assessment practice
Pennington, D. W., Potting, J., Finnveden, G., Lindeijer, E., Jolliet, O., Rydberg, T., & Rebitzer, G. (2004) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2003.12.009 · Cited by 776
Crop residues as raw materials for biorefinery systems—a LCA case study
Cherubini, F., & Ulgiati, S. (2010) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.08.024 · Cited by 553
LCA of renewable energy for electricity generation systems—A review
Varun, Bhat, I. K., & Prakash, R. (2009) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2008.08.004 · Cited by 544
Life Cycle Inventories of Agricultural Production Systems
Nemecek, T., & Kägi, T. (2007) · Cited by 485
Municipal solid waste management from a systems perspective
Eriksson, O., Carlsson Reich, M., Frostell, B., Björklund, A., Assefa, G., Sundqvist, J.-O., Granath, J., Baky, A., & Thyselius, L. (2005) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.02.018 · Cited by 444
Börjesson, P., & Tufvesson, L. M. (2011) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.001 · Cited by 329
Cited by
Campos-Guzmán, V., García-Cáscales, M. S., Espinosa, N., & Urbina, A. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.031 · Cited by 281
Life-cycle energy production and emissions mitigation by comprehensive biogas-digestate utilization
Chen, S., Chen, B., & Song, D. (2012) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.084 · Cited by 111
Economic Assessment of Biomethane Supply System based on Natural Gas Infrastructure
Paturska, A., Repele, M., & Bazbauers, G. (2015) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2015.06.011 · Cited by 84
Lyng, K.-A., & Brekke, A. (2019) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en12030532 · Cited by 79
Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of renewable gas technologies: A comparative review
Kolb, S., Plankenbühler, T., Hofmann, K., Bergerson, J., & Karl, J. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111147 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Poeschl, M., Ward, S., & Owende, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 24
- Pages
- 184-201
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003509580
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 34.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental impacts of biogas deployment – Part II: life cycle assessment of multiple production and utilization pathways. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.030
- The paper
- Poeschl, M., Ward, S., & Owende, P. (2012). Environmental impacts of biogas deployment – Part II: life cycle assessment of multiple production and utilization pathways. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.