Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 281

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A reverse logistics social responsibility evaluation framework based on the triple bottom line approach

Nikolaou, Ioannis E., Evangelinos, Konstantinos I., Allan, S.·2013·Journal of Cleaner Production
DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.009
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.009

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. Berle, 1932, For whom corporate are managers trustees: a note, Harvard Law Review, 45, 1365, 10.2307/1331920 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Carriga, 2004, Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory, Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51, 10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Carroll, 1991, The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders, Business Horizon, 39, 10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G · DOI · Paper page
  4. Carter, 2002, Logistics social responsibility: an integrative framework, Journal of Business Logistics, 23, 145, 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2002.tb00020.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. Carter, 2002, Social responsibility and supply chain relationships, Transportation Research, Part E, 38E, 37, 10.1016/S1366-5545(01)00008-4 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Castka, 2007, A critical look on quality through CSR lenses: key challenges stemming from the development of ISO 26000, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 24, 738, 10.1108/02656710710774700 · DOI
  7. Chen, 2009, Environmental-regulation pricing strategies for green supply chain management, Transportation Research Part E, 45, 667, 10.1016/j.tre.2009.04.010 · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2009.04.010
  8. Ciliberti, 2008, Logistics social responsibility: standard adoption and practices in Italian companies, International Journal of Production Economics, 113, 88, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.02.049 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Cruz, 2009, Supply chain networks with corporate social responsibility through integrated environmental decision-making, International Journal of Production Research, 47, 621, 10.1080/00207540701513901 · DOI
  10. Cruz, 2009, The impact of corporate social responsibility in supply chain management: multicriteria decision-making approach, Decision Support Systems, 48, 224, 10.1016/j.dss.2009.07.013 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Dixon, 2005, The role of environmental initiatives in encouraging companies to encourage in environmental reporting, European Management Journal, 23, 702, 10.1016/j.emj.2005.10.014 · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2005.10.014
  12. Dodd, 1932, For whom are corporate managers trustees?, Harvard Law Review, 45, 1145, 10.2307/1331697 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Dowlatshahi, 2005, A strategic framework for the design and implementation of remanufacturing operations in reverse logistics, International Journal of Production Research, 43, 3455, 10.1080/00207540500118118 · doi:10.1080/00207540500118118
  14. Dowlatshahi, 2010, A cost-benefit analysis for the design and implementation of reverse logistics systems: case studies approach, International Journal of Production Research, 48, 1361, 10.1080/00207540802552642 · DOI
  15. Efendigil, 2008, A holistic approach for selecting a third-party and Kongar E., 2008. A holistic approach for selecting a third-party reverse logistic provider in the presence of vagueness, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 54, 269, 10.1016/j.cie.2007.07.009 · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2007.07.009
  16. Fleischmann, 1997, Quantitative models for reverse logistics: a review, European Journal of Operational Research, 103, 1, 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00230-0 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Fleischmann, 2000, A characterization of logistics networks for product recovery, Omega, 28, 653, 10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00022-0 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Georgiadis, 2003, Analysis of the dynamic impact of environmental policies on reverse logistics, Operational Research: An International Journal, 3, 123, 10.1007/BF02940281 · doi:10.1007/bf02940281
  19. Gonzalez-Torre, 2004, Environmental and reverse logistics policies in European bottling and packaging firms, International Journal of Production Economics, 88, 95, 10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00181-6 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Gupta, 2009, A goal programming model for the operation for the operation of closed-loop supply chains, Engineering Optimization, 41, 713, 10.1080/03052150902802242 · doi:10.1080/03052150902802242
  21. Halldorsson, 2009, Supply chain management on the crossroad to sustainability: a blessing or a curse?, Logistic Research, 1, 83, 10.1007/s12159-009-0012-y · DOI
  22. Hu, 2002, A reverse logistics cost minimization model for the treatment of hazardous wastes, Transportation Research Part E, 38, 457, 10.1016/S1366-5545(02)00020-0 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Humphreys, 2003, Integrating environmental criteria into the supplier selection process, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 138, 349, 10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00097-9 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Ilgin, 2010, Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): a review of the state of the art, Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 563, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.037 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Kannan, 2009, A hybrid approach using ISM and fuzzy TOPSIS for the selection of reverse logistics provider, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54, 28, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.06.004 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Kok, 2001, A corporate social responsibility audit a quality management framework, Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 285, 10.1023/A:1010767001610 · DOI
  27. Krikke, 2003, Concurrent product and closed-loop supply chain design with an application to refrigerators, International Journal of Production Research, 41, 3689, 10.1080/0020754031000120087 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Kumar, 2006, Strategy alliance in a closed-loop supply chain, a case of manufacturer and eco-non-profit organization, Technovation, 26, 1127, 10.1016/j.technovation.2005.08.002 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Kumar, 2008, Cradle to cradle: reverse logistics strategies and opportunities across three industry sectors, International Journal of Production Economics, 115, 305, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.11.015 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Kumar, 2007, System dynamics study of the Japanese automotive industry closed-loop supply chain, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 18, 115, 10.1108/17410380710722854 · doi:10.1108/17410380710722854
  31. Lamming, 1996, The environmental as a supply chain management issues, British Journal of Management, 7, 545, 10.1111/j.1467-8551.1996.tb00147.x · DOI · Paper page
  32. Lee, 2009, A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 7917, 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.052 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Malony, 2006, Corporate social responsibility in the supply chain: an application in the food industry, Journal of Business Ethics, 68, 35, 10.1007/s10551-006-9038-0 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Mansour, 2008, A multi-period reverse logistics optimization model for end-of-life vehicles recovery based on EU directive, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 21, 764, 10.1080/09511920701685325 · doi:10.1080/09511920701685325
  35. Moneva, 2006, GRI and the camouflaging of corporate sustainability, Accounting Forum, 30, 121, 10.1016/j.accfor.2006.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Neto, 2009, From closed-loop to sustainable supply chains: the WEE case, International Journal of Production Research, 1
  37. Nikolaou, E.I., Evangelinos, K.I. A reverse logistic social responsibility evaluation framework, in Nikolaidis “Quality Aspects of Product Recovery”, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, in press.
  38. Pagell, 2009, Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 37, 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03162.x · DOI · Paper page
  39. Pagell, 2007, The supply chain implications of recycling, Business Horizons, 50, 133, 10.1016/j.bushor.2006.08.007 · DOI
  40. Plharel, 2009, Perspectives in reverse logistics: a review, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53, 175, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.11.006 · DOI
  41. Presley, 2007, A strategic sustainability justification methodology for organizational decisions: a reverse logistics illustration, International Journal of Production Research, 45, 4595, 10.1080/00207540701440220 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Presley, 2010, A strategic sustainability justification methodology for organizational decisions: a reverse logistics illustration, International Journal of Production Research, 45, 4595
  43. Pullman, 2009, Food for thought: social versus environmental sustainability practices and performance outcomes, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45, 38, 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03175.x · DOI · Paper page
  44. Ravi, 2005, Analysis of interactions among the barriers of reverse logistics, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 72, 1011, 10.1016/j.techfore.2004.07.002 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Ravi, 2005, Analyzing alternatives in reverse logistics for end-of-life computers: ANP and balanced scorecard approach, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 48, 327, 10.1016/j.cie.2005.01.017 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Reuter, 2010, Sustainable global supplier management: the role of dynamic capabilities in achieving competitive advantage, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46, 45, 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2010.03189.x · DOI · Paper page
  47. Roth, 2008, Unraveling the food supply chain: strategic insights from China and the 2007 recalls, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44, 22, 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2008.00043.x · DOI · Paper page
  48. Sarkis, 2010, Reverse logistics and social sustainability, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17, 337, 10.1002/csr.220 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Sarkis, 2003, A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management, Journal of Cleaner Production, 11, 397, 10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00062-8 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Schmidt, 2008, A recursive ecological indicator system for the supply chain of a company, Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1658, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.006 · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.006
  51. Serrato, 2007, A Markov decision model to evaluate outsourcing in reverse logistics, International Journal of Production Research, 45, 4289, 10.1080/00207540701450161 · DOI
  52. Sheu, 2005, An integrated logistics operational model for green–supply chain management, Transportation Research Part E, 41, 287, 10.1016/j.tre.2004.07.001 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Skilton, 2011, Getting the reader to ‘Iget It!’: clarification, differentiation and illustration, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47, 1, 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2011.03222.x · DOI
  54. Srivastrava, 2007, Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review, International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 53, 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00202.x · DOI · Paper page
  55. Teunter, 2001, A reverse logistics valuation method for inventory control, International Journal of Production Research, 39, 2023, 10.1080/00207540110043706 · doi:10.1080/00207540110043706
  56. Tschopp, 2005, Corporate social responsibility: a comparison between the United States and the European Union, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 12, 55, 10.1002/csr.69 · DOI
  57. Tsoulfas, 2008, A model for supply chains environmental performance analysis and decision making, Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1647, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.018 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Tsoulfas, 2002, An environmental analysis of the reverse supply chain of SLI batteries, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 36, 135, 10.1016/S0921-3449(02)00016-2 · doi:10.1016/s0921-3449(02)00016-2
  59. van Marrewijk, 2003, Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: between agency and communion, Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 95, 10.1023/A:1023331212247 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Walker, 2008, Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: lessons from the public and private sectors, Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 14, 69, 10.1016/j.pursup.2008.01.007 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Weeks, 2010, An empirical study of impacts of production mix, product route efficiencies on operations performance and profitability: a reverse logistics approach, International Journal of Production Research, 48, 1087, 10.1080/00207540802566428 · doi:10.1080/00207540802566428
  62. Wu, 1995, Environmental responsible logistics systems, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics, 25, 20, 10.1108/09600039510083925 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 281

Metadata

Authors
Nikolaou, I. E., Evangelinos, K. I., & Allan, S.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
56
Pages
173-184
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.009
OpenAlex
W2038137893
Cited by
281
References
2
FWCI
26.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A reverse logistics social responsibility evaluation framework based on the triple bottom line approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.009
The paper
Nikolaou, I. E., Evangelinos, K. I., & Allan, S. (2013). A reverse logistics social responsibility evaluation framework based on the triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.