The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustainability assessment of energy systems: integrating environmental, economic and social aspects
Open accessAbstract
Sustainable development of energy systems requires consideration of all three sustainability dimensions: environmental, economic and social. Current work presents a new decision-support framework for facilitating this. Taking a life cycle approach, the framework integrates the three sustainability dimensions to enable assessments at both technology and systems levels. The framework comprises scenario analysis, life cycle assessment, life cycle costing, social sustainability assessment and multi-criteria decision analysis, which are used to assess and identify the most sustainable energy options. The application of the framework is illustrated on the example of future electricity supply in Mexico. Eleven scenarios up to 2050 have been developed considering different technologies, electricity mixes and climate change targets. The results show that, based on the 17 sustainability criteria used in this work, the business-as-usual scenario, mostly based on fossil fuels, is unsustainable regardless of the preferences for different sustainability criteria. This is mainly due to the high costs and environmental impacts associated with fossil fuels. Overall, the most sustainable scenarios are those with higher penetration of renewables (wind, solar, hydro, geothermal and biomass) and nuclear power. These electricity pathways would enable meeting the national greenhouse gas emission targets by 2050 in a more sustainable way than envisaged by the current policy. However, some trade-offs among the sustainability criteria are needed, particularly with respect to the social impacts. These trade-offs can be explored easily within the decision-support framework to reveal how different stakeholder preferences affect the outcomes of sustainability assessment, thus contributing to more informed decision and policy making.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Thring, M. W. (1977) · Electronics and Power · doi:10.1049/ep.1977.0180 · Cited by 7,338
(2013) · Cited by 6,752
Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making
Wang, J.-J., Jing, Y.-Y., Zhang, C.-F., & Zhao, J.-H. (2009) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021 · Cited by 2,346
Review of solutions to global warming, air pollution, and energy security
Jacobson, M. Z. (2009) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/b809990c · Cited by 1,760
Categorising tools for sustainability assessment
Ness, B., Urbel-Piirsalu, E., Anderberg, S., & Olsson, L. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.023 · Cited by 1,407
Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies
Evans, A., Strezov, V., & Evans, T. J. (2009) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2008.03.008 · Cited by 1,023
Life cycle assessment An operational guide to the ISO standards
Guinée, J. B., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., de Koning, A., van Oers, L. F. C. M., Sleeswijk, A. W., de Haes, U., van Duin, R., & Lindeijer, E. (2001) · Cited by 935
Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment
Finkbeiner, M., Schau, E. M., Lehmann, A., & Traverso, M. (2010) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su2103309 · Cited by 915
International Energy Agency (2009) · World Energy Outlook · doi:10.1787/weo-2009-en · Cited by 859
Cited by
Mardani, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Khalifah, Z., Zakuan, N., Jusoh, A., Nor, K. M., & Khoshnoudi, M. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.053 · Cited by 359
Sindhu, S., Nehra, V., & Luthra, S. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.135 · Cited by 339
Campos-Guzmán, V., García-Cáscales, M. S., Espinosa, N., & Urbina, A. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.031 · Cited by 281
Khan, I., & Kabir, Z. (2020) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.132 · Cited by 233
Garcia, S., Cintra, Y., Torres, R. D. C. S. R., & Lima, F. G. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.110 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Santoyo-Castelazo, E., & Azapagic, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-10
- Volume
- 80
- Pages
- 119-138
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170758224
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 31.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustainability assessment of energy systems: integrating environmental, economic and social aspects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.061
- The paper
- Santoyo-Castelazo, E., & Azapagic, A. (2014). Sustainability assessment of energy systems: integrating environmental, economic and social aspects. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.