Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,760

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Review of solutions to global warming, air pollution, and energy security

Jacobson, Mark Z.·2009·Energy Environ. Sci.
DOI 10.1039/b809990c
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper reviews and ranks major proposed energy-related solutions to global warming, air pollution mortality, and energy security while considering other impacts of the proposed solutions, such as on water supply, land use, wildlife, resource availability, thermal pollution, water chemical pollution, nuclear proliferation, and undernutrition. Nine electric power sources and two liquid fuel options are considered. The electricity sources include solar-photovoltaics (PV), concentrated solar power (CSP), wind, geothermal, hydroelectric, wave, tidal, nuclear, and coal with carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology. The liquid fuel options include corn-ethanol (E85) and cellulosic-E85. To place the electric and liquid fuel sources on an equal footing, we examine their comparative abilities to address the problems mentioned by powering new-technology vehicles, including battery-electric vehicles (BEVs), hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (HFCVs), and flex-fuel vehicles run on E85. Twelve combinations of energy source-vehicle type are considered. Upon ranking and weighting each combination with respect to each of 11 impact categories, four clear divisions of ranking, or tiers, emerge. Tier 1 (highest-ranked) includes wind-BEVs and wind-HFCVs. Tier 2 includes CSP-BEVs, geothermal-BEVs, PV-BEVs, tidal-BEVs, and wave-BEVs. Tier 3 includes hydro-BEVs, nuclear-BEVs, and CCS-BEVs. Tier 4 includes corn- and cellulosic-E85. Wind-BEVs ranked first in seven out of 11 categories, including the two most important, mortality and climate damage reduction. Although HFCVs are much less efficient than BEVs, wind-HFCVs are still very clean and were ranked second among all combinations. Tier 2 options provide significant benefits and are recommended. Tier 3 options are less desirable. However, hydroelectricity, which was ranked ahead of coal-CCS and nuclear with respect to climate and health, is an excellent load balancer, thus recommended. The Tier 4 combinations (cellulosic- and corn-E85) were ranked lowest overall and with respect to climate, air pollution, land use, wildlife damage, and chemical waste. Cellulosic-E85 ranked lower than corn-E85 overall, primarily due to its potentially larger land footprint based on new data and its higher upstream air pollution emissions than corn-E85. Whereas cellulosic-E85 may cause the greatest average human mortality, nuclear-BEVs cause the greatest upper-limit mortality risk due to the expansion of plutonium separation and uranium enrichment in nuclear energy facilities worldwide. Wind-BEVs and CSP-BEVs cause the least mortality. The footprint area of wind-BEVs is 2–6 orders of magnitude less than that of any other option. Because of their low footprint and pollution, wind-BEVs cause the least wildlife loss. The largest consumer of water is corn-E85. The smallest are wind-, tidal-, and wave-BEVs. The US could theoretically replace all 2007 onroad vehicles with BEVs powered by 73 000–144 000 5 MW wind turbines, less than the 300 000 airplanes the US produced during World War II, reducing US CO2 by 32.5–32.7% and nearly eliminating 15 000/yr vehicle-related air pollution deaths in 2020. In sum, use of wind, CSP, geothermal, tidal, PV, wave, and hydro to provide electricity for BEVs and HFCVs and, by extension, electricity for the residential, industrial, and commercial sectors, will result in the most benefit among the options considered. The combination of these technologies should be advanced as a solution to global warming, air pollution, and energy security. Coal-CCS and nuclear offer less benefit thus represent an opportunity cost loss, and the biofuel options provide no certain benefit and the greatest negative impacts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/b809990c

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 82

  1. Ostro, 2006, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 56, 1007, 10.1080/10473289.2006.10464511 · DOI
  2. Pope, III, 2006, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 56, 709, 10.1080/10473289.2006.10464485 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Jacobson, 2004, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D21201, 10.1029/2004JD004945 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Jacobson, 2001, Nature, 409, 695, 10.1038/35055518 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Jacobson, 2002, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 4410, 10.1029/2001JD001376 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Chung, 2002, J. Geophys. Res., [Atmos.], 107, 4407, 10.1029/2001JD001397 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Hansen, 2005, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D18104, 10.1029/2005JD005776 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Ramanathan, 2008, Nat. Geosci., 1, 221, 10.1038/ngeo156 · DOI · Paper page
  9. G. M. Masters , Renewable and Efficient Electric Power Systems, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 2004, 654 pp · DOI · Paper page
  10. J. W. Tester , E. M.Drake, M. J.Driscoll, M. W.Golay, and W. A.Peters, Sustainable Energy, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 2005, 846 pp
  11. Cruz, J., ed., Ocean Wave Energy, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2008, 431 pp
  12. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) , Working Group III, 2007b, http://www.mnp.nl/ipcc/pages_media/FAR4docs/final_pdfs_ar4/Chapter04.pdf
  13. Colella, 2005, J. Power Sources, 150, 150, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.05.092 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Jacobson, 2005, Science, 308, 1901, 10.1126/science.1109157 · DOI · Paper page
  15. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2007) Key World Energy Statistics 2007, www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2007/key_stats_2007.pdf
  16. A. Leitner , Fuel from the sky: Solar Power's Potential for Western Energy Supply, NREL/SR-550-32160, 2002, www.nrel.gov/csp/pdfs/32160.pdf · doi:10.2172/15000950
  17. Archer, 2005, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D12110, 10.1029/2004JD005462 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Kempton, 2007, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L02817, 10.1029/2006GL028016 · DOI
  19. R. Wiser , and M.Bolinger, Annual report on U.S. wind power installation, cost, and performance trends: 2007, LBNL-275E, U.S. Department of Energy, 2008, http://eetd.lbl.gov/ea/ems/reports/lbnl-275e.pdf · DOI
  20. International Energy Agency (IEA) , Statistics by county/region, 2006, www.iea.org/Textbase/stats/index.asp
  21. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) , IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Prepared by working group III, ed. Metz. B., O. Davidson, H. C. de Coninck, M. Loos, and L. A. Meyer, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2005, 442 pp., http://arch.rivm.nl/env/int/ipcc/
  22. Jacobson, 2001, Science, 293, 1438, 10.1126/science.1063376 · DOI
  23. M. J. Dvorak , M. Z.Jacobson, and C. L.Archer(2007), California offshore wind energy potential, Proc. AWAE Wind Power, 2007, June 3-6, Los Angeles, California, CD-ROM
  24. Munk, 1998, Deep–Sea Res. Part I, 45, 1977, 10.1016/S0967-0637(98)00070-3 · DOI · Paper page
  25. G. I. Marchuk , and B. A.Kagan, Dynamics of Ocean Tides, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989 · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2571-7
  26. S. Krohn, ed., The energy balance of modern wind turbines, Wind Power, 1997, 16, 1–15
  27. E. H. du Marchie van Voorthuysen , Large-scale concentrating solar power (CSP) technology, in Macro-Engineering: a Challenge for the Future, ed. V. Badescu, R. B. Cathcart, R. D. Schuiling, Springer, 2006, Ch. 3, www.gezen.nl/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/macroengineering-5.pdf
  28. Mendax Microsystems , Solar power plants, 2007, http://www.mendax.com/Solution-Warehouse.aspx?slnid = 75&iid=
  29. Tahara, 1997, Energy Convers. Manage., 38, S615, 10.1016/S0196-8904(97)00005-8 · DOI
  30. R. Delmas , Long term greenhouse gas emissions from the hydroelectric reservoir of Petit Saut (French Guiana) and potential impacts, Global Warming and Hydroelectric Reservoirs, 2005, CDD 363.73874, pp. 117–124
  31. J. Pearce , and A.Lau, Net energy analysis for sustainable energy production from silicon based solar cells, Proceedings of Solar 2002, Sunrise on the Reliable Energy Economy, June 15–20, 2002, Reno, Nevada, http://jupiter.clarion.edu/∼jpearce/Papers/netenergy.pdf
  32. C. Bankier , and S.Gale, Energy payback of roof mounted photovoltaic cells, Energy Bulletin, 2006, www.energybulletin.net/17219.html
  33. Fthenakis, 2006, Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl., 14, 275, 10.1002/pip.706 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Raugei, 2007, Energy, 32, 1310, 10.1016/j.energy.2006.10.003 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Fthenakis, 2007, Energy Policy, 35, 2549, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.06.022 · DOI · Paper page
  36. World Nuclear Association (WNO) , Comparative carbon dioxide emissions from power generation, 2008, www.world-nuclear.org/education/comparativeco2.html
  37. Sovacool, 2008, Energy Policy, 36, 2940
  38. F. H. Koch , Hydropower-internalized costs and externalized benefits, International Energy Agency (IEA) - Implementing agreement for hydropower technologies and programs, Ottawa, Canada, 2000, www.nei.org/keyissues/protectingtheenvironment/lifecycleemissionsanalysis/
  39. Odeh, 2008, Energy Policy, 36, 367, 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.026 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Shapouri, 2003, Trans. ASAE, 46, 959, 10.13031/2013.13951 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Pimentel, 2005, Nat. Resour. Res., 14, 67, 10.1007/s11053-005-4679-8 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Farrell, 2006, Science, 311, 506, 10.1126/science.1121416 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Patzek, 2006, Science, 312, 1747
  44. Jacobson, 2004, J. Clim., 17, 2909, 10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<2909:TSCBLG>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017
  45. B. Cohen , The nuclear energy option, Plenum Press, 1990, www.phyast.pitt.edu/∼blc/book/chapter9.html · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-6002-3
  46. Koomey, 2007, Energy Policy, 35, 5630, 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
  47. World Nuclear Association (WNO) , Energy analysis of power systems, 2008a, www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf11.html
  48. T. Van de Wekken , Doing it right: The four seasons of wind farm development, 2008, http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/reworld/story?id = 52021
  49. Toon, 2007, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1973, 10.5194/acp-7-1973-2007 · DOI
  50. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) , Monitoring nuclear weapons and nuclear-explosive materials, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 2005, 250 pp
  51. Robock, 2007, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2003, 10.5194/acp-7-2003-2007 · DOI
  52. Andreae, 2001, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 15, 955, 10.1029/2000GB001382 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Jacobson, 2008, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L03809
  54. Spadaro, 2001, Atmos. Environ., 35, 4763, 10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00264-3 · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00264-3
  55. Graham, 2008, Atmos. Environ., 42, 4498, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.061 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Schmer, 2008, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 105, 464, 10.1073/pnas.0704767105 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP) , Water use by ethanol plants: Potential challenges, 2006, Summary Data Sheet, http://www.agobservatory.org/library.cfm?refid = 89449
  58. Pimentel, 2003, Nat. Resour. Res., 12, 127, 10.1023/A:1024214812527 · DOI · Paper page
  59. P. Torcellini , N.Long, and R.Judkoff, Consumptive water use for US power production, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, 2003, www.nrel.gov/docs/fy04osti/33905.pdf · DOI · Paper page
  60. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) (2002), Water & Sustainability (Vol. 3): U.S. water consumption for power production – the next half century, Topical Report 1006786, March 2002, www.epriweb.com/public/000000000001006786.pdf
  61. L. Stoddard , J.Abiecunas, and R.O'Connell, Economic, energy, and environmental benefits of concentrating solar power in California, NREL/SR-550–39291, 2006, http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy06osti/39291.pdf · doi:10.2172/881924
  62. Milliman, 1983, J. Geol., 91, 1, 10.1086/628741 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Dong Energy, Vattenfall, Danish Energy Authority, and Danish Forest and Nature Agency , Danish Offshore Wind: Key Environmental issues, 2006www.ens.dk/graphics/Publikationer/Havvindmoeller/havvindmoellebog_nov_2006_skrm.pdf
  64. Menzel, 1984, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, 13, 183, 10.1080/15287398409530493 · DOI
  65. Johnson, 1983, Environ. Sci. Technol., 17, 294, 10.1021/es00113a717 · doi:10.1021/es00113a717 · Paper page
  66. McLaughlin, 1985, J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc., 35, 512, 10.1080/00022470.1985.10465928 · doi:10.1080/00022470.1985.10465928
  67. Sandermann, 1996, Ozone and plant health, Annual Review of Phytopathology, 34, 347, 10.1146/annurev.phyto.34.1.347 · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.34.1.347
  68. San Jose Mercury News (2006), April 27, 2006
  69. T. Williams , Drunk on Ethanol, Audubon, Aug. 2004, http://magazine.audubon.org/incite/incite0408.html
  70. E. StaMaria , and M. Z.Jacobson, New parameterization for wind farm effects on the atmosphere, Proc. AWEA Windpower 2008 Conference, Houston, Texas, 2008, June 1–4, CD-ROM
  71. Zerriffi, 2002, Electr. J., 15, 55, 10.1016/S1040-6190(01)00262-7 · doi:10.1016/s1040-6190(01)00262-7
  72. North American Reliability Council (2005) 2000–2004 generating availability report, http://www.nerc.com/∼gads/
  73. Kahn, 1979, Electr. Power Syst., 2, 1, 10.1016/0378-7796(79)90021-X · DOI
  74. Archer, 2003, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4289, 10.1029/2002JD002076 · DOI · Paper page
  75. Archer, 2007, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 46, 1701, 10.1175/2007JAMC1538.1 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Red Electrica De Espana , Wind power generation in real time, 2008, www.ree.es/ingles/operacion/curvas_eolica.asp
  77. Grubb, 1991, Energy Policy, 19, 670, 10.1016/0301-4215(91)90100-3 · doi:10.1016/0301-4215(91)90100-3
  78. Solarnavigator , Geothermal energy, 2008, www.solarnavigator.net/geothermal_energy.htm
  79. G. Hoste , M.Dvorak, and M. Z.Jacobson, Combining renewables to provide baseload or load matching power. VPUE Final Report, Stanford University, 2008
  80. California Wind Energy Collaborative , California RPS integration cost analysis-Phase I: One year analysis of existing resources, CEC 500-03-108C, 2003
  81. Voorspools, 2007, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 11, 78, 10.1016/j.rser.2004.12.006 · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2004.12.006
  82. M. Eberhard , and M.Tarpenning, The 21st century electric car, 2006, http://www.evworld.com/library/Tesla_21centuryEV.pdf

Cited by

See all 1,760

Metadata

Authors
Jacobson, M. Z.
Venue
Energy Environ. Sci.
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Published
2009
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
148-173
ISSN
  • 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-5706
DOI
10.1039/b809990c
OpenAlex
W2155305805
Cited by
1,760
References
5
FWCI
26.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of solutions to global warming, air pollution, and energy security. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/b809990c
The paper
Jacobson, M. Z. (2009). Review of solutions to global warming, air pollution, and energy security. Energy Environ. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1039/b809990c

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.