The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Green product development and performance of Brazilian firms: measuring the role of human and technical aspects
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The goal of this study is to present and test a conceptual framework that describes the technical aspects (TA), human/organizational aspects (HOA) of the adoption of green product development (GPD) practices and the effect of these practices on firms' environmental (EP), operational (OP) and market performance (MP). To this end, after reviewing the literature on these themes, a conceptual framework with 5 hypotheses is proposed. These hypotheses were tested on 62 Brazilian companies through structural equation modeling using SmartPLS 2.0M3. The main results of this study are as follows: (a) in general, the proposed framework obtained adequate goodness of fit statistics (GoF); (b) technological factors are shown to have an influence on the adoption of GPD practices, and those practices are related to company EP, OP and MP, thus confirming 4 hypotheses of the study; and (c) one of the study's hypotheses is not validated, indicating that the relationship of human/organizational aspects to GPD must be further analyzed. This work extends the literature because: (a) the conceptual framework tested in this study establishes several concepts that have been only partially tested in the previous literature; (b) this work presents evidence about Brazil, where the themes addressed herein have not been yet been thoroughly investigated; and (c) the non-validation of the hypothesis regarding the relationship between human/organizational aspects with respect to the adoption of product-related environmental practices requires attention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pls-Sem: indeed a silver bullet
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011) · Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.2753/mtp1069-6679190202 · Cited by 21,631
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771
Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & van Oppen, C. (2009) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20650284 · Cited by 4,944
The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan
Chen, Y.-S., Lai, S.-B., & Wen, C.-T. (2006) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9025-5 · Cited by 2,684
Green Human Resource Management: A Review and Research Agenda*
Renwick, D. W. S., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00328.x · Cited by 2,586
An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature
Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q., & Lai, K.-H. (2011) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.11.010 · Cited by 2,267
Slack, N., Chambers, S., & Johnston, R. B. (2010) · doi:10.82444/warw.33661327 · Cited by 1,792
Empirical research methods in operations management
Flynn, B. B., Sakakibara, S., Schroeder, R. G., Bates, K. A., & Flynn, E. J. (1990) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/0272-6963(90)90098-x · Cited by 1,634
Peng, D. X., & Lai, F. (2012) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2012.06.002 · Cited by 1,532
Cited by
Loaning scale and government subsidy for promoting green innovation
Huang, Z., Liao, G., & Li, Z. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.023 · Cited by 561
A supply chain sustainability innovation framework and evaluation methodology
Kusi-Sarpong, S., Gupta, H., & Sarkis, J. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1518607 · Cited by 406
Willingness to pay more for green products: A critical challenge for Gen Z
Gomes, S., Lopes, J. M., & Nogueira, S. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136092 · Cited by 369
Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Seuring, S., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Jugend, D., De Camargo Fiorini, P., Latan, H., & Izeppi, W. C. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110416 · Cited by 346
Self-citationCan digital transformation improve market and ESG performance? Evidence from Chinese SMEs
Wang, S., & Esperança, J. P. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137980 · Cited by 315
Metadata
- Authors
- Jabbour, C. J. C., Jugend, D., Jabbour, A. B. L. D. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Latan, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 87
- Pages
- 442-451
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2058842828
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 87
- FWCI
- 43.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Green product development and performance of Brazilian firms: measuring the role of human and technical aspects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.036
- The paper
- Jabbour, C. J. C., Jugend, D., Jabbour, A. B. L. D. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Latan, H. (2015). Green product development and performance of Brazilian firms: measuring the role of human and technical aspects. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.036
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
