Cited by 2,586Environmental Sustainability in BusinessJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorHuman Resource and Talent Management

Green Human Resource Management: A Review and Research Agenda*

Open access
Renwick, Douglas W.S., Redman, Tom, Maguire, Stuart·2013·International Journal of Management Reviews

Abstract

The paper makes a case for the integration of the largely separate literatures of environmental management (EM) and human resource management (HRM) research. The paper categorizes the existing literature on the basis of Ability–Motivation–Opportunity (AMO) theory, revealing the role that Green human resource management (GHRM) processes play in people‐management practice. The contributions of the paper lie in drawing together the extant literature in the area, mapping the terrain of the field, identifying some gaps in the existing literature and suggesting some potentially fruitful future research agendas. The findings of the review suggest that understanding of how GHRM practices influence employee motivation to become involved in environmental activities lags behind that of how organizations develop Green abilities and provide employees with opportunities to be involved in EM organizational efforts. Organizations are not using the full range of GHRM practices, and this may limit their effectiveness in efforts to improve EM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00328.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Renwick, D. W. S., Redman, T., & Maguire, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author
Renwick, Douglas W.S.
Venue
International Journal of Management Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-01-10
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 1460-8545 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2370
OpenAlex
W2138206378
Cited by
2,586
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 378 · 2025: 411 · 2024: 385 · 2023: 365 · 2022: 295 · 2021: 211 · 2020: 145 · 2019: 119 · 2018: 78 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 14
FWCI
70.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • International Journal of Management Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
Keywords
green human resource management, environmental management, human resource management, ability-motivation-opportunity theory, employee motivation, research agenda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review