The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards zero-waste valorisation of rare-earth-containing industrial process residues: a critical review
Open accessAbstract
The supply risk for some critical rare-earth elements (REEs), which are instrumental in many cleantech applications, has sparked the development of innovative recycling schemes for End-of-Life fluorescent lamps, permanent magnets and nickel metal hydride batteries. These waste fractions represent relatively small volumes, albeit with relatively high rare-earth contents. Rare earths are also present in lower concentrations in a multitude of industrial process residues, such as phosphogypsum, bauxite residue (red mud), mine tailings, metallurgical slags, coal ash, incinerator ash and waste water streams. This review discusses the possibilities to recover rare earths from these “secondary resources”, which have in common that they contain only low concentrations of rare-earth elements, but are available in very large volumes and could provide significant amounts of rare earths. The success rate is set to increase if the rare-earth recovery from these industrial waste streams is part of a comprehensive, zero-waste, “product-centric” valorisation scheme, in which applications are found for the residual fractions that are obtained after removal of not only the rare earths but also other valuable (base) metals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review
Fu, F., & Wang, Q. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011 · Cited by 8,703
A critical review on solvent extraction of rare earths from aqueous solutions
Xie, F., Zhang, T. A., Dreisinger, D., & Doyle, F. (2014) · Minerals Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2013.10.021 · Cited by 1,444
Removal of Heavy Metals and Lanthanides from Industrial Phosphoric Acid Process Liquors
KOOPMAN, C., WITKAMP, G. J., & VAN ROSMALEN, G. M. (1999) · Separation Science and Technology · doi:10.1081/ss-100100818 · Cited by 39 · cited 1×
“…solutions, and most of these methods were based on solvent extraction or ion-exchange (Kumar et al., 2011; Radhika et al., 2011; Kumar et al., 2010; Reddy et al., 2009; Bunus and Dumitrescu, 1992; Bunus et al., 1994; Bunus, 2000; Koopman et al., 1999b; Koopman et al., 1999a; Habashi, 1985).”
Method
Cited by
Alkaline residues and the environment: a review of impacts, management practices and opportunities.
Gomes, H. I., Mayes, W. M., Rogerson, M., Stewart, D. I., & Burke, I. T. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.111 · Cited by 413
Zhao, F., Yang, Z., Wei, Z., Spinney, R., Sillanpää, M., Tang, J., Tam, M., & Xiao, R. (2020) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.124307 · Cited by 120
Case, M. E., Fox, R. V., Baek, D. L., Mincher, B. J., & Wai, C. M. (2017) · Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange · doi:10.1080/07366299.2017.1373984 · Cited by 23
Performance and bacterial community shifts during phosphogypsum biotransformation
Martins, M., Assunção, A., Neto, A., Silva, G., Sghaier, H., & Costa, M. C. (2016) · Water, Air, & Soil Pollution · doi:10.1007/s11270-016-3129-z · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Binnemans, K., Jones, P. T., Blanpain, B., Van Gerven, T., & Pontikes, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 99
- Pages
- 17-38
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968744581
- Cited by
- 625
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 49.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards zero-waste valorisation of rare-earth-containing industrial process residues: a critical review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.089
- The paper
- Binnemans, K., Jones, P. T., Blanpain, B., Van Gerven, T., & Pontikes, Y. (2015). Towards zero-waste valorisation of rare-earth-containing industrial process residues: a critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.089
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
