The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direct digital manufacturing: definition, evolution, and sustainability implications
Open accessAbstract
One of the hot topics currently in manufacturing domain is direct digital manufacturing. With introduction of cheap three-dimensional printers, the direct digital manufacturing seems to become a new manufacturing paradigm with an entirely different impact on society; nevertheless how this will impact the society and the differences between the paradigms are unclear. According to this background, this paper presents a comprehensive analysis of direct digital manufacturing from different perspectives in comparison to various traditional manufacturing paradigms. Authors are using a societal viewpoint to see, describe and analyse the subject instead of traditional manufacturing viewpoint. For the better understanding of direct digital manufacturing origins, a classification and historical background about available techniques are described. Furthermore, direct digital manufacturing as a paradigm is analysed and compared with craft production, mass production and mass customisation. Direct digital manufacturing's sustainability aspects related to social, economical and environmental dimensions are gathered and analysed for a better insight of this technique. A detailed case study demonstrates the energy use differences of direct digital manufacturing and mass production in depth. According to the present work, direct digital manufacturing has the possibility of combining the advantages of the other production paradigms and can have a positive impact on sustainable development; yet, there are several challenges to overcome both in technical and sociality aspects. A challenge within the social aspects can be the life style changes which can impact the job market, working environment, waste management and more.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brundtland, G. H. (1991) · Earth and Us · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-1049-0.50009-5 · Cited by 12,174
The machine that changed the world
(1992) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(92)90400-v · Cited by 5,805
Additive Manufacturing Technologies: Rapid Prototyping to Direct Digital Manufacturing
Gibson, I., Rosen, D. W., & Stucker, B. (2010) · National University of Singapore · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1120-9 · Cited by 2,969
Mass customization: The new frontier in business competition
(1999) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/s0278-6125(99)90108-5 · Cited by 2,322
Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review
Huang, S. H., Liu, P., Mokasdar, A., & Hou, L. (2013) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-012-4558-5 · Cited by 1,862
Progress in Additive Manufacturing and Rapid Prototyping
Kruth, J.-P., Leu, M. C., & Nakagawa, T. (1998) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/s0007-8506(07)63240-5 · Cited by 1,331
Towards energy and resource efficient manufacturing: A processes and systems approach
Duflou, J. R., Sutherland, J. W., Dornfeld, D., Herrmann, C., Jeswiet, J., Kara, S., Hauschild, M., & Kellens, K. (2012) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2012.05.002 · Cited by 1,164
Additive manufacturing: A framework for implementation
Mellor, S., Hao, L., & Zhang, D. (2014) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.07.008 · Cited by 777
Additive manufacturing in the spare parts supply chain
Khajavi, S. H., Partanen, J., & Holmström, J. (2014) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2013.07.008 · Cited by 683
Mass customization: The new frontier in business competition
Niblock, M. (1993) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(93)90218-5 · Cited by 664
Cited by
Sustainability through digital transformation: A systematic literature review for research guidance
Guandalini, I. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.003 · Cited by 445
Kellens, K., Baumers, M., Gutowski, T. G., Flanagan, W., Lifset, R., & Duflou, J. R. (2017) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12629 · Cited by 310
Why manufacturers adopt additive manufacturing technologies: The role of sustainability
Niaki, M. K., Torabi, S. A., & Nonino, F. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.019 · Cited by 298
Design for sustainable additive manufacturing: A review
Hegab, H., Khanna, N., Monib, N., & Salem, A. (2023) · Sustainable Materials and Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.susmat.2023.e00576 · Cited by 289
‘Better together’: Evidence on the joint adoption of circular economy and industry 4.0 technologies
Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Choi, T.-M., & Latan, H. (2022) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108581 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, D., Heyer, S., Ibbotson, S., Salonitis, K., Steingrímsson, J. G., & Thiede, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 107
- Pages
- 615-625
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W413421679
- Cited by
- 498
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 34.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct digital manufacturing: definition, evolution, and sustainability implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.009
- The paper
- Chen, D., Heyer, S., Ibbotson, S., Salonitis, K., Steingrímsson, J. G., & Thiede, S. (2015). Direct digital manufacturing: definition, evolution, and sustainability implications. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.