Cited by 217Wine Industry and TourismOrganic Food and AgricultureEconomic and Environmental Valuation

Exploring environmental consciousness and consumer preferences for organic wines without sulfites

D'Amico, Mario, Di Vita, Giuseppe, Monaco, Luisa·2016·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.014

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
D'Amico, M., Di Vita, G., & Monaco, L.
Affiliations
University of Catania (IT)
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
120
Pages
64-71
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2273419675
Cited by
217
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3
FWCI
89.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management › Wine Industry and Tourism
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
Keywords
organic wine, environmental awareness, consumer willingness to pay, premium pricing, consumer preferences, food additives, naturalness, denomination of origin, consumer information, purchasing behavior, organic food consumption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review