The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental impacts of food consumption in Europe
Open accessAbstract
Food consumption is amongst the main drivers of environmental impacts. On one hand, there is the need to fulfil a fundamental human need for nutrition, and on the other hand this poses critical threats to the environment. In order to assess the environmental impact of food consumption, a lifecycle assessment (LCA)-based approach has been applied to a basket of products, selected as being representative of EU consumption. A basket of food products was identified as representative of the average food and beverage consumption in Europe, reflecting the relative importance of the products in terms of mass and economic value. The products in the basket are: pork, beef, poultry, milk, cheese, butter, bread, sugar, sunflower oil, olive oil, potatoes, oranges, apples, mineral water, roasted coffee, beer and pre-prepared meals. For each product in the basket, a highly disaggregated inventory model was developed based on a modular approach, and built using statistical data. The environmental impact of the average food consumption of European citizens was assessed using the International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) methodology. The overall results indicate that, for most of the impact categories, the consumed foods with the highest environmental burden are meat products (beef, pork and poultry) and dairy products (cheese, milk and butter). The agricultural phase is the lifecycle stage that has the highest impact of all the foods in the basket, due to the contribution of agronomic and zootechnical activities. Food processing and logistics are the next most important phases in terms of environmental impacts, due to their energy intensity and the related emissions to the atmosphere that occur through the production of heat, steam and electricity and during transport. Regarding the end-of-life phase, human excretion and wastewater treatments pose environmental burdens related to eutrophying substances whose environmental impacts are greater than those of the agriculture, transports and processing phases. Moreover, food losses which occur throughout the whole lifecycle, in terms of agricultural/industrial and domestic food waste, have also to be taken into consideration, since they can amount to up to 60% of the initial weight of the food products. The results of the study go beyond the mere assessment of the potential impacts associated with food consumption, as the overall approach may serve as a baseline for testing eco-innovation scenarios for impact reduction as well as for setting targets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185383 · Cited by 11,943
Conceptualizing food systems for global environmental change research
Ericksen, P. J. (2008) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.002 · Cited by 1,486 · cited 1×
“), and there are several nexuses and feedbacks from food system outcomes to drivers of environmental and social change (Ericksen, 2008).”
BackgroundOpening the black box of food waste reduction
Garrone, P., Melacini, M., & Perego, A. (2014) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.03.014 · Cited by 394
Cited by
Meat consumption: Which are the current global risks? A review of recent (2010–2020) evidences
González, N., Marquès, M., Nadal, M., & Domingo, J. L. (2020) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109341 · Cited by 445
Confente, I., Scarpi, D., & Russo, I. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.030 · Cited by 321
The logistics of the short food supply chain: A literature review
Paciarotti, C., & Torregiani, F. (2021) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.002 · Cited by 262
Comprehensiveness of circular economy assessments of regions: a systematic review at the macro-level
Van Bueren, B. J. A., Iyer-Raniga, U., Leenders, M. A. A. M., & Argus, K. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac209c · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Notarnicola, B., Tassielli, G., Renzulli, P. A., Castellani, V., & Sala, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 140
- Pages
- 753-765
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2424732783
- Cited by
- 563
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 36.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental impacts of food consumption in Europe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.080
- The paper
- Notarnicola, B., Tassielli, G., Renzulli, P. A., Castellani, V., & Sala, S. (2017). Environmental impacts of food consumption in Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.080
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.