Cited by 394Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilitySustainable Supply Chain ManagementAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact

Opening the black box of food waste reduction

Open access
Garrone, Paola, Melacini, Marco, Perego, Alessandro·2014·Food Policy

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.03.014

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preventing food becoming wasted may be more effective than diverting food that has already been categorised as waste away from landfill and incineration to other waste destinations higher up the food waste hierarchy.

    “It is worth noting that preventing food becoming wasted (e.g. via preventing food waste at source, feeding to other people, etc.) may be more effective than diverting food that has already been categorised as waste away from landfill and incineration to other waste destinations higher up the food waste hierarchy (e.g. composting, anaerobic digestion).”

    From Review: Consumption-stage food waste reduction interventions – What works and how to design better interventions (2019) · cites this paper as Garrone et al., 2014

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes source reduction and recovery for human consumption as high-priority strategies in the food-waste hierarchy. “Managing surplus food” (page unavailable) lists composting and fuel production as other uses before waste disposal. The paper does not assess whether preventing waste is more effective than diverting already-wasted food from landfill or incineration to composting or anaerobic digestion. (LLM, conf=0.80)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Edible products are sorted out due to quality, expired before being purchased, or being damaged or spilled in the market.

    “Consequently, edible products are sorted out due to quality, expired before being purchased, or being damaged or spilled in the market [6,43,64,66].”

    From Understanding Food Loss and Waste—Why Are We Losing and Wasting Food? (2019) · cites this paper as [64]

    The Agriculture and fishing section identifies non-compliance with market standards, such as fruit size and shape, as a source of surplus food. The Retail trade and Case B sections describe unsold products reaching their sell-by date and products with damaged packaging. These passages support most of the claim, but they do not identify spills as a cause. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Excessive cooking in the household causes food waste, and the type of service provided in the food service industry that provides an excessive amount of food such as a buffet also causes food waste.

    “Excessive cooking in the household causes food waste, but the type of service provided in the food service industry, which provides an excessive amount of food such as a buffet, also causes food waste [43,64,105].”

    From Understanding Food Loss and Waste—Why Are We Losing and Wasting Food? (2019) · cites this paper as [64]

    The Household consumption section says food cooked but not consumed becomes surplus that is mainly disposed of. The Food service and Case C sections link overproduction to surplus food and report that some of it is disposed of as waste. The copy does not identify buffets or an excessive-portion service model as a cause. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garrone, P., Melacini, M., & Perego, A.
Affiliations
Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Corresponding author
Melacini, Marco
Venue
Food Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
46
Pages
129-139
ISSN
0306-9192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3125771866
Cited by
394
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
32.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Policy (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Keywords
food waste reduction, food supply chain sustainability, food waste reduction strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review