Cited by 65Environmental Impact and SustainabilitySustainable Supply Chain ManagementSustainable Design and Development

Environmental and economic assessment of durability of energy-using products: Method and application to a case-study vacuum cleaner

Open access
Bobba, Silvia, Ardente, Fulvio, Mathieux, Fabrice·2016·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

The article focuses on the quantitative assessment of the benefits and/or burdens of extending the lifetime of products. Longer lasting products can be less efficient than newer one, implying higher energy consumption, environmental impacts and costs. The article illustrates a set of indicators, named “Pro-EnDurAncE” (Environmental and Economic Assessment of Durability of Products), developed for the assessment of products durability from both environmental and economic perspectives. Pro-EnDurAncE indicators have been structured to capture various relevant aspects, as the impacts and costs of the studied product and of potentially replacing products, the maintenance and repair, the lifetime extension and the use of energy and auxiliary materials during the operation. The proposed indicators were illustrated upon a case-study vacuum cleaner. It resulted that extending the lifetime of this product produce environmental and economic benefits in the large majority of scenarios considered. For example, when the impacts of repair are negligible, the extension of the lifetime by 250 h (i.e. 5 years) avoids around 4.2% of Global Warming Potential impact compared to the replacement of the vacuum cleaner with a new one 15% more energy efficient. Analogously, despite the occurring repair costs, the economic benefits for extending the lifetime by 250 h are equal to 40€ (i.e. about 8.6% of the life cycle costs) compared to the replacement with a new product 15% more energy efficient. The article concludes that the Pro- EnDurAncE indicators are applicable to investigate the durability of products in several different scenarios and they are robust and flexible since the assessment can based on a large number of parameters and different scenarios. These indicators can be used to assess product at the design stage or to support policy measures to promote more durable products.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.093

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Extending product lifetime through improved reliability frequently yields greater environmental benefits than post-failure repair alone.

    “This finding aligns with durability-focused life cycle assessment studies demonstrating that extending product lifetime through improved reliability frequently yields greater environmental benefits than post-failure repair alone [18,38,39].”

    From Designing for Repair and Extended Lifespan: Consumer Expectations and Economic Constraints (2026) · cites this paper as [38]

    Section 5.3 (page unavailable) reports environmental benefits from extending a vacuum cleaner’s lifetime and compares scenarios with low and high repair impacts; the high-repair scenario yields lower benefits. It does not directly compare improved reliability with post-failure repair alone, or establish that reliability frequently yields greater benefits across products. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The ones that focus on prolonging the lifetime of products using both LCA and LCC analyze the effect of increasing the durability of active products instead of replacing them with more efficient products.

    “The ones that focus on prolonging the lifetime of products using both LCA and LCC analyze the effect of increasing the durability of active products instead of replacing them with more efficient products (e.g., [19,43,44]).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Abele, E., Anderl, R., Birkhofer, H., 2005. Environmentally-friendly Product Devel- opment Methods and Tools, sixth ed. Springer, London. Accumulair, 2015. Bissel Replacement PrEÀmotor Filter. http://www.amazon.com/ 203-1073-Bissell-Cleaner-Replacement-PrE-Motor/dp/B0054SN33Y (accessed 2.1.16.).
  2. Allenby, B.R., 2006. Improvement plan of recycling rate of the electronic & electrical equipment with considering of economics; case study of vacuum cleaner. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, 2006. Ieee, pp. 336e339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ ISEE.2006.1650087. · DOI
  3. Ardente, F., Mathieux, F., 2014a. Identification and assessment of product's mea- sures to improve resource efficiency: the case-study of an Energy using Product. J. Clean. Prod. 83, 126e141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.058. · DOI
  4. Ardente, F., Mathieux, F., 2014b. Environmental assessment of the durability of energy-using products: method and application. J. Clean. Prod. 74, 62e73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.049. · DOI
  5. Baitz, M., Kreißig, J., Byrne, E., Makishi, C., Kupfer, T., Frees, N., Bey, N., Hansen, M.S., Hansen, A., Bosch, T., Borghi, V., Watson, J., Miranda, M., 2004. Final Report -Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of PVC and of Principal Competing Materials. New York, N.Y. Barba-Guti errez, Y., Adenso-Díaz, B., Lozano, S., 2008. Eco-efficiency of electric and electronic appliances: a data envelopment analysis (DEA). Environ. Model. Assess. 14, 439e447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10666-007-9134-2. · DOI
  6. Boustani, A., Sahni, S., Graves, S.C., Gutowski, T.G., 2010. Appliance remanufacturing and life cycle energy and economic savings. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems & Technology. IEEE, Arling- ton, US.
  7. Cooper, T., 2012. Product longevity. In: Network Conference on Product Life Extension: Knowledge Transfer between Clothing and Consumer Electronics - Oslo 27th-28th March 2012. Oslo, Norway.
  8. Davis, L.W., 2008. Durable Goods and Residential Demand for Energy and Water: Evidence from a Field Trial. RAND J. Econ. 39 (2), 530e546.
  9. Dewulf, W., Duflou, J.R., 2004. The environmentally optimised lifetime: A crucial concept in life cycle engineering. Proc. Glob. Conf. Sustain. Prod. Dev. Life Cycle Eng. 2004, 59e62.
  10. European Commission (EC), 2013b. Commission Desicion of 17 December 2013 Establishing the Ecological Criteria for the Award of the EU Ecolabel for Imaging Equipment (Notified under Document C(2013) 9097) (No. C(2013) 9097)). European Commission (EC), 2013c. Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) Guide, Recommendation 2013/179/EU of the European Commission of 9 April 2013 on the Use of Common Methods to Measure and Communicate the Life Cycle Environmental Performance of Products and Organisations. European Commission (EC), 2014a. Commission Communication in the Framework of the Implementation of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 665/2013 Supplementing Directive 2010/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with Regard to Energy Labelling of Vacuum Cleaners and of Commis- sion Regulation (EU) No 666/2013 Implementing Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with Regard to Ecodesign Re- quirements for Vacuum Cleaners. European Commission (EC), 2014b. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Energy prices and costs in Europe (No. COM(2014) 21/2). SWD(2014) 20 final. European Commission (EC), 2015a. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Com- mittee and the Committee of of the Regions. Closing the loop -An EU action plan for the Circular Economy. COM(2015) 614 final. European Commission (EC), 2015b. Commission Implementing Decision of 17.12.2015 on a Standardisation Request to the European Standardisation Or- ganisations as Regards Ecodesign Requirements on Material Efficiency Aspects for Energy-related Products in Support of the Implementation of Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. C(2015) 9096 final: 1-13. European Commission (EC) -DG Environment and DG Growth, 2015c. Joint Workshop on the Implementation of Article 15 of WEEE Directive 2012/19/EU. Brussels, Belgium.
  11. Ernzer M. Birkhofer H., How to Carry Out Life Cycle Design? Methodical Support for Product Developers, Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Sus- tainable Consumption, 613-631, Tokyo, 2003.
  12. Horie, Y.A., 2004. Life Cycle Optimization of Household Refrigerator-freezer Replacement. Master's Thesis. University of Michigan.
  13. Hur, T., Lee, J., Ryu, J., Kwon, E., 2005. Simplified LCA and matrix methods in identifying the environmental aspects of a product system. J. Environ. Manag. 75, 229e237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.11.014. · DOI
  14. Kobayashi, H., 2005. Strategic evolution of eco-products: A product life cycle planning methodology. Res. Eng. Des. 16, 1e16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s00163-005-0001-3. · DOI
  15. Kobayashi, Y., Kobayashi, H., Hongu, A., Sanehira, K., 2005. A Practical Method for Quantifying Eco-efficiency Using Eco-design Support Tools. J. Ind. Ecol. 9, 131e144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/108819805775247990. · DOI
  16. Kota, S., Chakrabarti, A., 2007. Use of DFE methodologies and tools -major barriers and challenges. In: International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED'07- 28-31/08/2007. Paris, France.
  17. Monier, V., Hestin, M., Chanoine, A., Witte, F., Guilcher, S., 2013. Study on the Quantification of Waste of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) in France. BIO Intelligence Service S.A.S. Mora, E.P., 2007. Life cycle, sustainability and the transcendent quality of building materials. Build. Environ. 42, 1329e1334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.buildenv.2005.11.004. · DOI
  18. Murakami, S., Oguchi, M., Tasaki, T., Daigo, I., Hashimoto, S., 2010. Lifespan of Commodities, Part I. J. Ind. Ecol. 14, 598e612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1530- 9290.2010.00250.x. Nordic Ecolabelling, 2015. Nordic Ecolabelling of Windows and Exterior Doors. Version 4.2. Okumura, S., Morikuni, T., Okino, N., December 2001. Life design for remanu- facturing durable products. Proc. Second Int. Symp. Environ. Conscious Des. Inverse Manuf., Tokyo. 11e15, 275e280. · DOI
  19. ONR -€ Osterreichischen Normungsinstituts Regeln, 2014. ONR 192102-Durability Label for Electric and Electronic Appliances Designed for Easy Repair (In German). Edition 2014-10-01.
  20. Rose, C.M., Stevels, A., 1999. Product Characteristics and their Relationship to End- of-Life Strategies. In: Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Symposium, Electronics and the Environment.
  21. Tasaki, T., Motoshita, M., Uchida, H., Suzuki, Y., 2013. Assessing the Replacement of Electrical Home Appliances for the Environment: An Aid to Consumer Decision Making Tasaki et al. Replacement of Home Appliances for the Environment. J. Ind. Ecol. 17, 290e298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00551.x. TNS. Flash Eurobarometer 388. Attitudes of Europeans Towards Resource Efficiency. 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.2779/14825. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/public_ opinion/flash/fl_388_en.pdf (accessed July 2016) · DOI
  22. van Nes, N., Cramer, J., 2006. Product lifetime optimization: a challenging strategy towards more sustainable consumption patterns. J. Clean. Prod. 14, 1307e1318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.04.006. · DOI
  23. WRAP -Waste & Resources Action Pogramme, 2013. Product Design Review of a Vacuum Cleaner.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bobba, S., Ardente, F., & Mathieux, F.
Affiliations
  • Politecnico di Torino (IT)
  • European Commission (BE)
Corresponding author
Ardente, Fulvio
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
137
Pages
762-776
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2481219357
Cited by
65
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino) (submittedVersion)
  • Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Commission – Directorate General for Environment (070307/2012/ENV.C1/635340)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
Keywords
product durability, service life extension, vacuum cleaners, environmental impact assessment, economic evaluation, energy consumption, maintenance and repair, product substitution, life cycle cost, global warming potential, energy-saving products

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review