Cited by 76Environmental Impact and SustainabilityLife Cycle Costing AnalysisSustainable Supply Chain Management

Is product durability better for environment and for economic efficiency? A comparative assessment applying LCA and LCC to two energy-intensive products

Iraldo, Fabio, Facheris, Camilla, Nucci, Benedetta·2017·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.017

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iraldo, F., Facheris, C., & Nucci, B.
Affiliations
Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT)
Corresponding author
Nucci, Benedetta
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
140
Pages
1353-1364
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2528030312
Cited by
76
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Life Cycle Costing Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
product durability, energy-intensive products, circular economy, household refrigerators, electric oven, energy efficiency, life cycle cost, life cycle assessment, environmental impact, economic efficiency, end-of-life stage, sensitivity analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review