Cited by 310Environmental Sustainability in BusinessConsumer Perception and Purchasing BehaviorSustainable Supply Chain Management

Why determinants of green purchase cannot be treated equally? The case of green cosmetics: Literature review

Open access
Liobikienė, Genovaitė, Bernatonienė, Jurga·2017·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.204

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liobikienė, G., & Bernatonienė, J.
Affiliations
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LT)
Corresponding author
Liobikienė, Genovaitė
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
162
Pages
109-120
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2623354913
Cited by
310
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 4
FWCI
20.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
  • Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (submittedVersion)
  • Vytautas Magnus University (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
green purchase behavior, green cosmetics, green marketing, personal care products, health consciousness, sustainable consumption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review