Why determinants of green purchase cannot be treated equally? The case of green cosmetics: Literature review
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Liobikienė and Bernatonienė (2017) showed that most studies analysed determinants of green products in general, merging all green products into one term.
“Liobikienė and Bernatonienė (2017) showed that most of the studies analysed the determinants of GP (Green Products) in general, merging all green products into one term.”
From Internal factors influencing customer attitude, purchase intention and purchase behaviour with regard to green personal care products. A literature review (2023) · cites this paper as Liobikienė and Bernatonienė (2017)
An earlier literature review on the determinants of green personal care products consumption treated the factors affecting attitude, purchase intention and purchase behaviour collectively under the term 'green purchase behaviour'.
“The earlier literature review that focused on the analysis of the determinants of GPCPs' consumption treated the factors affecting ATT, PI and PB collectively under the term 'green purchase behaviour' (Liobikienė & Bernatonienė, 2017)”
From Internal factors influencing customer attitude, purchase intention and purchase behaviour with regard to green personal care products. A literature review (2023) · cites this paper as Liobikienė & Bernatonienė, 2017
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587 · see citing works
Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action
Paul, J., Modi, A., & Patel, J. (2016) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.006 · Cited by 2,399 · see citing works
Chen, Y., & Chang, C. (2012) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/00251741211216250 · Cited by 1,370 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A step forward on sustainability in the cosmetics industry: A review
Bom, S., Jorge, J., Ribeiro, H. M., & Marto, J. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.255 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Pop, R.-A., Săplăcan, Z., & Alt, M.-A. (2020) · Information · doi:10.3390/info11090447 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Chin, J., Jiang, B. C., Mufidah, I., Persada, S. F., & Noer, B. A. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10113922 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Shimul, A. S., Cheah, I., & Khan, B. B. (2022) · Journal of Global Marketing · doi:10.1080/08911762.2021.1934770 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Suphasomboon, T., & Vassanadumrongdee, S. (2022) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2022.07.004 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Sustainability paradigm in the cosmetics industry: State of the art
Rocca, R., Acerbi, F., Fumagalli, L., & Taisch, M. (2022) · Cleaner Waste Systems · doi:10.1016/j.clwas.2022.100057 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Bacterial Nanocellulose toward Green Cosmetics: Recent Progresses and Challenges
Almeida, T., Silvestre, A. J. D., Vilela, C., & Freire, C. S. R. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22062836 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Kolling, C., Ribeiro, J. L. D., & de Medeiros, J. F. (2022) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2021.12.002 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Green Skepticism: Review and Research Agenda
Sivapalan, A., Jebarajakirthy, C., Saha, R., Mehta, P., Balaji, M. S., & Maseeh, H. I. (2024) · Marketing Intelligence & Planning · doi:10.1108/mip-04-2023-0179 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Multi-stakeholder perspectives on sustainability transitions in the cosmetic industry
Suphasomboon, T., & Vassanadumrongdee, S. (2023) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2023.04.008 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Szaban, M. (2023) · Argumenta Oeconomica · doi:10.15611/aoe.2023.2.12 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liobikienė, G., & Bernatonienė, J.
- Affiliations
- Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LT)
- Corresponding author
- Liobikienė, Genovaitė
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 162
- Pages
- 109-120
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2623354913
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 20.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
- Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (submittedVersion)
- Vytautas Magnus University (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Keywords
- green purchase behavior, green cosmetics, green marketing, personal care products, health consciousness, sustainable consumption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review