Cited by 115Sustainable Finance and Green BondsFinancial Markets and Investment StrategiesCorporate Social Responsibility Reporting

Assessment of Chinese green funds: performance and industry allocation

Jin, Jiayu, Han, Liyan·2018·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.211

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jin, J., & Han, L.
Affiliations
Beihang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Han, Liyan
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
171
Pages
1084-1093
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2756961935
Cited by
115
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (71673020, 71173008, 71690244)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Keywords
green funds, green finance, fund performance, industry beta, value stocks, small-cap stocks, market sensitivity, industrial restructuring, innovation and R&D, new normal economy, smart manufacturing, small and medium-sized enterprises, China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review