The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Barriers to promoting prefabricated construction in China: A cost–benefit analysis
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Prefabricated construction has attracted worldwide concern because of its significant role in the creation of sustainable urbanization. In Mainland China, the practice of applying prefabrication technology in the construction industry still lags behind. In fact, the economic benefit is a key concern of various stakeholders involved in the construction process and is expected to influence the delivery of prefabricated buildings significantly. Therefore, this study established a cost–benefit analysis framework to explore the basic cost composition of prefabrication and examined the effect of adopting prefabrication on the total cost of real building projects. Results show that the concrete and steel used in the typical prefabricated components were responsible for 26% to 60% of the total cost, followed by labor cost (17%–30%) and transportation (10%). The average incremental cost is highly linearly correlated with the prefabrication rate, which ranged from 237 yuan/m2 to 437 yuan/m2, in eight building projects. To fully gain the economic benefits from the precast construction, the future focus should lie in providing financial support for promoting the development of prefabrication technology, optimizing the structure integrity of prefabricated buildings, and improving the maturity of the precast market.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A holistic review of off-site construction literature published between 2008 and 2018
Jin, R., Gao, S., Cheshmehzangi, A., & Aboagye-Nimo, E. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.195 · Cited by 363
Challenges in current construction and demolition waste recycling: A China study
Ma, M., Tam, V. W. Y., Le, K. N., & Li, W. (2020) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2020.09.030 · Cited by 259
Hao, J., Chen, Z., Zhang, Z., & Loehlein, G. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-020-09026-2 · Cited by 69
Recycled construction and demolition waste material: a cost–benefit analysis under uncertainty
Tseng, M.-L., Jeng, S.-Y., Lin, C.-W., & Lim, M. K. (2021) · Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/meq-08-2020-0175 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Hong, J., Shen, G. Q., Li, Z., Zhang, B., & Zhang, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 172
- Pages
- 649-660
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2765538283
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Barriers to promoting prefabricated construction in China: A cost–benefit analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.171
- The paper
- Hong, J., Shen, G. Q., Li, Z., Zhang, B., & Zhang, W. (2018). Barriers to promoting prefabricated construction in China: A cost–benefit analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.171
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.