Cited by 99Sustainable Building Design and AssessmentSustainable Supply Chain ManagementSustainable Design and Development

Selection Criteria for Building Materials and Components in Line with the Circular Economy Principles in the Built Environment—A Review of Current Trends

Open access
Rahla, Kamel Mohamed, Mateus, Ricardo, Bragança, Luís·2021·Infrastructures

Abstract

A growing concern is given to the environmental impacts caused by the construction industry. Waste generation, resource consumption, and greenhouse gas emissions are the main drawbacks of the rapid urbanization that the world is witnessing. As a response to these pressing issues, policymakers and academia are exploring the concept of Circular Economy (CE) to manage resources better and achieve resource efficiency while eliminating waste. One of the strategies to implement CE in the built environment is to select the appropriate building materials and components from the early stages to carry out the concept’s principles along the value chain and create a closed-loop system. Therefore, this study aims at identifying selection criteria for building elements according to CE principles through a review of the latest research. Results have shown that little has been concretely achieved in terms of a paradigm shift to CE since the main focus of the literature is still the use of recycled products and the recyclability of building materials and components at their end-of-life. Although the present study is solely focused on the technical aspect of building materials and components, it outlines current adopted criteria to bring about a circular built environment and highlights the need for a more innovative approach to attain higher circularity levels.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/infrastructures6040049

Cites

156 of 156 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Boulding, K.E. The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth; The MIT Press: New York, NY, USA, 1966.
  2. Preston, F. A Global Redesign? Shaping the Circular Economy; Energy, Environment and Resource Governance: Oxford, UK, 2012; pp. 1-20.
  3. European Parliament and Council. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain directives. Off. J. Eur. Union 2008, 34, 3-30.
  4. Bragança, L. Portugal SB07 Sustainable Construction, Materials and Practices: Challenge of the Industry for the New Millennium; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rahla, K. M., Mateus, R., & Bragança, L.
Affiliations
University of Minho (PT)
Corresponding author
Rahla, Kamel Mohamed
Venue
Infrastructures
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-03-24
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
49
ISSN
2412-3811 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3138232015
Cited by
99
References
155
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Infrastructures (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Universidade do Minho (UMINHO/BID/2020/71)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
Keywords
circular economy, building materials, architectural elements, selection criteria, circularity, environmental impact of construction, resource efficiency, waste reduction, recyclability, end of life, closed-loop systems, value chain, recycled products

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review