The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bio-based plastics - A review of environmental, social and economic impact assessments
Abstract
Abstract Bio-based plastics show an evolving market and application range and therefore have become increasingly popular in research and economy. The limitation of fossil resources as well as linked environmental issues have led to the development of an innovative bioeconomy and also triggered the shift from fossil-based plastics to bio-based plastics. The original motivation for this study was to propose a comprehensive approach to calculate the sustainability performance of bio-based plastics on a global scale. To provide a calculative basis, a review on available data from life cycle assessment (LCA), social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) studies on bio-based plastics was carried out and showed limited availability of quantifiable results with regard to the social and economic performance of bio-based plastics. In environmental LCA, with the ISO-family and related documents, a group of harmonized standards and approaches does exist. However, missing practical and consented guidelines hamper the comparability of studies and the exploitability of data - not only within the bio-based plastic sector but also in comparison to the fossil-based counterparts. Therefore, a calculation for the global sustainability performance of bio-based plastics was merely conducted for the environmental impact category global warming potential. Taking the technical substitution potential of fossil-based with bio-based plastics as well as limitations in data availability into account the estimation was performed for a substitution of approximately two-thirds of the global plastic demand. The results show, that bio-based plastics could potentially save 241 to 316 Mio. t of CO2-eq. annually. Thereby this study gives a first outlook how bio-based plastics could contribute to a sustainable development, making benefits and drawbacks more tangible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels
Hill, J., Nelson, E., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Tiffany, D. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0604600103 · Cited by 2,871
Life cycle sustainability assessment of products: (with Comments by Helias A. Udo de Haes, p. 95)
Kloepffer, W. (2008) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1065/lca2008.02.376 · Cited by 1,129
Plastics derived from biological sources: present and future: a technical and environmental review
Chen, G.-Q., & Patel, M. K. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200162d · Cited by 997
Álvarez-Chávez, C. R., Edwards, S., Moure-Eraso, R., & Geiser, K. (2012) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.003 · Cited by 491
Martínez-Blanco, J., Lehmann, A., Muñoz, P., Antón, A., Traverso, M., Rieradevall, J., & Finkbeiner, M. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.044 · Cited by 245
Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel: a case study in Jambi Province of Indonesia
Manik, Y., Leahy, J., & Halog, A. (2013) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-013-0581-5 · Cited by 209
Challenges in Life Cycle Assessment: An Overview of Current Gaps and Research Needs
Finkbeiner, M., Ackermann, R., Bach, V., Berger, M., Brankatschk, G., Chang, Y.-J., Grinberg, M., Lehmann, A., Martínez-Blanco, J., Minkov, N., et al. (2014) · LCA Compendium – The Complete World of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8697-3_7 · Cited by 122
Cited by
Bioplastics for a circular economy
Rosenboom, J.-G., Langer, R., & Traverso, G. (2022) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-021-00407-8 · Cited by 2,116
Strategies to reduce the global carbon footprint of plastics
Zheng, J., & Suh, S. (2019) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0459-z · Cited by 1,252
Kumar, R., Verma, A., Shome, A., Sinha, R., Sinha, S., Jha, P. K., Kumar, R., Kumar, P., Shubham, Das, S., et al. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13179963 · Cited by 1,111
Naser, A. Z., Deiab, I., & Darras, B. M. (2021) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d1ra02390j · Cited by 836
Dogu, O., Pelucchi, M., Van de Vijver, R., Van Steenberge, P. H. M., D'hooge, D. R., Cuoci, A., Mehl, M., Frassoldati, A., Faravelli, T., & Van Geem, K. M. (2021) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2020.100901 · Cited by 698
Metadata
- Authors
- Spierling, S., Knüpffer, E., Behnsen, H., Mudersbach, M., Krieg, H., Springer, S., Albrecht, S., Herrmann, C., & Endres, H.-J.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 185
- Pages
- 476-491
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2789370206
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 18.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bio-based plastics - A review of environmental, social and economic impact assessments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.014
- The paper
- Spierling, S., Knüpffer, E., Behnsen, H., Mudersbach, M., Krieg, H., Springer, S., Albrecht, S., Herrmann, C., & Endres, H.-J. (2018). Bio-based plastics - A review of environmental, social and economic impact assessments. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
