The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From a literature review to a multi-perspective framework for reverse logistics barriers and drivers
Abstract
Abstract The emergence of stricter environmental regulations and the growing environmental consciousness of customers have forced industries to start thinking about environmental operations management with the help of reverse logistics application. In this process, influential factors such as drivers and barriers have to be examined, and stakeholders' different perspectives on RL implementation and development should also be considered. This paper presents a multi-perspective framework for reverse logistics implementation using the lens of stakeholder theory. The multiple stakeholders' perspective framework was developed based upon a structured literature review process. Fifty-four papers concerning these topical areas were thoroughly assessed and classified according to their structural dimensions and analytical categories. Two extensive lists of 37 drivers and 36 barriers, categorized and analyzed against the dimensions and categories, served as a basis for the development of the referred framework. Thereby, the overall contribution of this work proposes an understanding of the factors required for employing reverse logistics from multiple perspectives, including those of the company, society, government, and customer. Additionally, each perspective is discussed separately with the aid of previous works developed in the field. Most of the encountered barriers are placed in the firm's perspective; however, these barriers may be an effect from outside impediments. On the drivers' side, the factors must be acknowledged so managers can prepare for changes by exploring these positive influential factors. A consideration of the influential factors from multiple perspectives is critical for creating a comprehensive industry strategy to successfully implement product return.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.323 · Cited by 4,029
Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training
Sarkis, J., Gonzalez‐Torre, P., & Adenso‐Diaz, B. (2010) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2009.10.001 · Cited by 1,518
Designing the green supply chain
Beamon, B. M. (1999) · Logistics Information Management · doi:10.1108/09576059910284159 · Cited by 1,160
Theories in sustainable supply chain management: A structured literature review
Touboulic, A., & Walker, H. (2015) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-05-2013-0106 · Cited by 688
Change management--or change leadership?
Gill, R. (2002) · Journal of Change Management · doi:10.1080/714023845 · Cited by 513
Cited by
Policies for transitioning towards a circular economy: Expectations from the European Union (EU)
Hartley, K., van Santen, R., & Kirchherr, J. (2020) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104634 · Cited by 468
Khan, S. A. R., Yu, Z., Golpira, H., Sharif, A., & Mardani, A. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123357 · Cited by 432
Govindan, K., Mina, H., Esmaeili, A., & Gholami-Zanjani, S. M. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118317 · Cited by 331
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Govindan, K., & Bouzon, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 187
- Pages
- 318-337
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2794015972
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 42.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From a literature review to a multi-perspective framework for reverse logistics barriers and drivers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.040
- The paper
- Govindan, K., & Bouzon, M. (2018). From a literature review to a multi-perspective framework for reverse logistics barriers and drivers. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.