CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 468

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Policies for transitioning towards a circular economy: Expectations from the European Union (EU)

Hartley, Kris, van Santen, Ralf, Kirchherr, Julian·2020·Resources, Conservation and Recycling
DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104634
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104634

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. Adams, 2017, Circular economy in construction: current awareness, challenges and enablers, Proc. Inst. Civil Eng. Waste Resour. Manag., 170, 15
  2. Adjei-Bamfo, 2019, The role of e-government in sustainable public procurement in developing countries: a systematic literature review, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 142, 189, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.001 · DOI
  3. Baldassarre, 2019, Industrial Symbiosis: towards a design process for eco-industrial clusters by integrating Circular Economy and Industrial Ecology perspectives, J. Clean. Prod., 216, 446, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.091 · DOI
  4. Bicket, 2016, Designing policy mixes for resource efficiency: the role of public acceptability, Sustainability, 8, 366, 10.3390/su8040366 · DOI
  5. Blomsma, 2017, The emergence of circular economy: a new framing around prolonging resource productivity, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 603, 10.1111/jiec.12603 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Cheng, 2018, Green Public Procurement, missing concepts and future trends–a critical review, J. Clean. Prod., 176, 770, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.027 · DOI
  7. Cui, 2018, Bibliometric and review of the research on circular economy through the evolution of Chinese public policy, Scientometrics, 116, 1013, 10.1007/s11192-018-2782-y · DOI
  8. da Silva, 2018, Proposal of a dynamic model to evaluate public policies for the circular economy: scenarios applied to the municipality of Curitiba, Waste Manag., 78, 456, 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.06.007 · DOI
  9. Domenech, 2019, Transition towards a resource efficient circular economy in Europe: policy lessons from the EU and the member states, Ecol. Econ., 155, 7, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.001 · DOI
  10. Ekvall, 2016, A systemic and systematic approach to the development of a policy mix for material resource efficiency, Sustainability, 8, 373, 10.3390/su8040373 · DOI
  11. Estrada, 2011, Policy modeling: definition, classification and evaluation, J. Policy Model., 33, 523, 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2011.02.003 · DOI
  12. Gåvertsson, 2018, Quality labelling for Re-used ICT equipment to support consumer choice in the circular economy, J. Consum. Policy, 1
  13. Geissdoerfer, 2017, The circular economy–a new sustainability paradigm?, J. Clean. Prod., 143, 757, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Geng, 2009, Implementing China’s circular economy concept at the regional level: a review of progress in Dalian, China, Waste Manag., 29, 996, 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.06.036 · DOI
  15. Govindan, 2018, From a literature review to a multi-perspective framework for reverse logistics barriers and drivers, J. Clean. Prod., 187, 318, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.040 · DOI
  16. Haney, 1998, Drawing on education: using student drawings to promote middle school improvement, Schools Middle, 7, 38
  17. Hauschild, 2017, An integrated framework for life cycle engineering, Procedia CIRP, 61, 2, 10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.257 · DOI
  18. Heberlein, 2012, Navigating environmental attitudes, Conserv. Biol., 26, 583, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01892.x · DOI
  19. Heeres, 2004, Eco-industrial park initiatives in the USA and the Netherlands: first lessons, J. Clean. Prod., 12, 985, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.02.014 · DOI
  20. Henry, 2019, A typology of circular start-ups–An analysis of 128 circular business models, J. Clean. Prod.
  21. Heshmati, 2017, A review of the circular economy and its implementation, Int. J. Green Econ., 11, 251, 10.1504/IJGE.2017.089856 · DOI
  22. Islam, 2013, A comparative study of public sector sustainable procurement practices, opportunities and barriers, Int. Rev. Bus. Res. Pap., 9, 62
  23. Kalmykova, 2018, Circular economy–From review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 135, 190, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.034 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Keskisaari, 2018, The use of waste materials in wood-plastic composites and their impact on the profitability of the product, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 134, 257, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.03.023 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Kirchherr, 2019, Towards an education for the circular economy (ECE): five teaching principles and a case study, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 150
  26. Kirchherr, 2019, Research on the circular economy: a critique of the field, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 151, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104480 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Kirchherr, 2018, Enhancing the sample diversity of snowball samples: recommendations from a research project on anti-dam movements in Southeast Asia, PLoS One, 13, 1, 10.1371/journal.pone.0201710 · DOI
  28. Kirchherr, 2018, Barriers to the circular economy: evidence from the european union (EU), Ecol. Econ., 150, 264, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Korhonen, 2018, Circular economy: the concept and its limitations, Ecol. Econ., 143, 37, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Kuipers, 2018, Associations between tobacco control mass media campaign expenditure and smoking prevalence and quitting in England: a time series analysis, Tob. Control, 27, 455, 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053662 · DOI
  31. Lahti, 2018, A definition and theoretical review of the circular economy, value creation, and sustainable business models: where are we now and where should research move in the future?, Sustainability, 10, 2799, 10.3390/su10082799 · DOI
  32. Lazarevic, 2017, Narrating expectations for the circular economy: towards a common and contested European transition, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 31, 60, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.006 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Li, 2010, Energy conservation and circular economy in China’s process industries, Energy, 35, 4273, 10.1016/j.energy.2009.04.021 · DOI
  34. Lieder, 2016, Towards circular economy implementation: a comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry, J. Clean. Prod., 115, 36, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Liu, 2014, An exploration of firms’ awareness and behavior of developing circular economy: an empirical research in China, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 87, 145, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.04.002 · DOI
  36. Malmgren, 1961, Information, expectations and the theory of the firm, Q. J. Econ., 75, 399, 10.2307/1885131 · DOI
  37. Marshall, 1996, Sampling for qualitative research, Fam. Pract., 13, 522, 10.1093/fampra/13.6.522 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Masi, 2018, Towards a more circular economy: exploring the awareness, practices, and barriers from a focal firm perspective, Prod. Plan. Control., 29, 539, 10.1080/09537287.2018.1449246 · DOI
  39. Masi, 2017, Supply chain configurations in the circular economy: a systematic literature review, Sustainability, 9, 1602, 10.3390/su9091602 · DOI
  40. Massarutto, 2014, The long and winding road to resource efficiency–An interdisciplinary perspective on extended producer responsibility, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 85, 11, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.11.005 · DOI
  41. Mathews, 2011, Progress toward a circular economy in China: the drivers (and inhibitors) of eco‐industrial initiative, J. Ind. Ecol., 15, 435, 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00332.x · DOI
  42. McDowall, 2017, Circular economy policies in China and Europe, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 651, 10.1111/jiec.12597 · DOI
  43. Merli, 2018, How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review, J. Clean. Prod., 178, 703, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112 · DOI
  44. Milios, 2018, Advancing to a Circular Economy: three essential ingredients for a comprehensive policy mix, Sustain. Sci., 13, 861, 10.1007/s11625-017-0502-9 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Mishenin, 2018, Sustainable regional development policy formation: role of industrial ecology and logistics, Int. J. Entrepreneurship Sustain. Issues, 5
  46. Murray, 2017, The circular economy: an interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context, J. Bus. Ethics, 140, 369, 10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Nußholz, 2019, Circular building materials: carbon saving potential and the role of business model innovation and public policy, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 141, 308, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.036 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Park, 2019, Scaling‐Up of Industrial Symbiosis in the Korean National Eco‐Industrial Park Program: Examining Its Evolution over the 10 Years between 2005–2014, J. Ind. Ecol., 23, 197, 10.1111/jiec.12749 · DOI
  49. Planing, 2015, Business model innovation in a circular economy reasons for non-acceptance of circular business models, Open J. Bus. Model Innov., 1
  50. Primeaux, 1994, Profit maximization: the ethical mandate of business, J. Bus. Ethics, 13, 287, 10.1007/BF00871675 · DOI
  51. Reh, 2013, Process engineering in circular economy, Particuology, 11, 119, 10.1016/j.partic.2012.11.001 · DOI
  52. Saavedra, 2018, Theoretical contribution of industrial ecology to circular economy, J. Clean. Prod., 170, 1514, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.260 · DOI
  53. Sacirovic, 2018, Eco-industrial zones in the context of sustainability development of urban areas, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 1
  54. Sakr, 2011, Critical success and limiting factors for eco-industrial parks: global trends and Egyptian context, J. Clean. Prod., 19, 1158, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.01.001 · DOI
  55. Sauvé, 2016, Environmental sciences, sustainable development and circular economy: alternative concepts for trans-disciplinary research, Environ. Dev., 17, 48, 10.1016/j.envdev.2015.09.002 · DOI
  56. Schandl, 2010, Resource use and resource efficiency in the Asia–Pacific region, Glob. Environ. Change, 20, 636, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.06.003 · DOI
  57. Shi, 2014, Eco-industrial parks from strategic niches to development mainstream: the cases of China, Sustainability, 6, 6325, 10.3390/su6096325 · DOI
  58. Schroeder, 2019, The relevance of circular economy practices to the Sustainable Development Goals, J. Ind. Ecol., 23, 77, 10.1111/jiec.12732 · DOI
  59. Silva, 2019, Circular economy: analysis of the implementation of practices in the Brazilian network, Revista de Gestão, 26, 39, 10.1108/REGE-03-2018-0044 · DOI
  60. Stormer, 2003, Making the shift: moving from" ethics pays" to an inter-systems model of business, J. Bus. Ethics, 44, 279, 10.1023/A:1023600820194 · DOI
  61. Tukker, 2019, Concepts fostering resource efficiency: a trade-off between ambitions and viability, Ecol. Econ., 155, 36, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.020 · DOI
  62. Walker, 2012, Sustainable procurement: an international policy analysis of 30 OECD countries, 5th International Public Procurement Conference, 3556
  63. Walker, 2012, Sustainable procurement: past, present and future, J. Purch. Supply Manag., 18, 201, 10.1016/j.pursup.2012.11.003 · DOI
  64. Wang, 2018, Sustainable public procurement policies on promoting scientific and technological innovation in China: comparisons with the US, the UK, Japan, Germany, France, and South Korea, Sustainability, 10, 2134, 10.3390/su10072134 · DOI
  65. Watkins, 2016, Policy mixes to achieve absolute decoupling: an ex ante assessment, Sustainability, 8, 528, 10.3390/su8060528 · DOI
  66. Whalen, 2019, Three circular business models that extend product value and their contribution to resource efficiency, J. Clean. Prod., 226, 1128, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.128 · DOI
  67. Whicher, 2018, Design for circular economy: developing an action plan for Scotland, J. Clean. Prod., 172, 3237, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.009 · DOI
  68. Wilts, 2019, A policy mix for resource efficiency in the EU: key instruments, challenges and research needs, Ecol. Econ., 155, 59, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.05.004 · DOI
  69. Witjes, 2016, Towards a more Circular Economy: proposing a framework linking sustainable public procurement and sustainable business models, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 112, 37, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.015 · DOI · Paper page
  70. Wu, 2014, Effectiveness of the policy of circular economy in China: a DEA-based analysis for the period of 11th five-year-plan, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 83, 163, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.10.003 · DOI
  71. Xue, 2010, Survey of officials’ awareness on circular economy development in China: based on municipal and county level, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 54, 1296, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.05.010 · DOI
  72. Zhu, 2019, Efforts for a circular economy in China: a comprehensive review of policies, J. Ind. Ecol., 23, 110, 10.1111/jiec.12754 · DOI
  73. Zuo, 2006, Business Process Reengineering in Circular Economy, Ecol. Econ., 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 468

Metadata

Authors
Hartley, K., van Santen, R., & Kirchherr, J.
ORCID
Hartley, Kris
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
155
Pages
104634
ISSN
0921-3449
DOI
10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104634
Cited by
468
References
9
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review