The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Close-looped recycling of polylactic acid used in 3D printing: An experimental investigation and life cycle assessment
Abstract
Abstract The objective of this work is to investigate the potential of close-looped recycling of polylactic acid (PLA) that used in 3D printing, from the perspectives of material properties and environmental performance. A commercial grade of PLA was extruded into filament, then was subjected to fused deposition modelling (FDM) 3D printing process. The printed products were later shredded and re-extruded for repeating 3D printing cycle. Samples were taken from each repeating cycle, were characterised in terms of mechanical, rheological, molecular, thermal and morphological properties. In the experiment, the material can only be reprocessed for two 3D printing cycles, as the reprocessed material can no longer be further processing. Although little changes are observed in the mechanical properties, the viscosity measurements suggest that PLA deteriorates significantly due to the repeated FDM 3D printing cycles. The reduced viscosity values are compatible with the decrements in average molecular weights and thermal stability, the increments of carbonyl bonds, crystallinity and pinholes in the materials' surfaces. Virgin PLA was blended into the recycled material to improve the viscosities, which enables the blends 3D printable. The results of life cycle assessment approach show that the environmental burdens associated with close-looped recycling are lower than those of placing the 3D printed products in incineration or in landfill. Incineration might be another environmental alternative, due to the material embodies a relatively high calorific value; however, the material is not recuperated, thus incineration cannot satisfy the more stringent environmental legislations, in which recovery and reuse of materials are rigorously required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges
Ngo, T. D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K. T. Q., & Hui, D. (2018) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 · Cited by 8,431
Hahladakis, J. N., Velis, C. A., Weber, R., Iacovidou, E., & Purnell, P. (2018) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.10.014 · Cited by 3,873
Mechanical and chemical recycling of solid plastic waste
Ragaert, K., Delva, L., & Van Geem, K. (2017) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2017.07.044 · Cited by 3,276
A global sustainability perspective on 3D printing technologies
Gebler, M., Schoot Uiterkamp, A. J. M., & Visser, C. (2014) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.033 · Cited by 950
Carrasco, F., Pagès, P., Gámez-Pérez, J., Santana, O. O., & Maspoch, M. L. (2010) · Polymer Degradation and Stability · doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.11.045 · Cited by 738
Gu, F., Guo, J., Zhang, W., Summers, P. A., & Hall, P. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.278 · Cited by 423
Effect of thermo-mechanical cycles on the physico-chemical properties of poly(lactic acid)
Pillin, I., Montrelay, N., Bourmaud, A., & Grohens, Y. (2008) · Polymer Degradation and Stability · doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.12.005 · Cited by 289
Deroiné, M., Le Duigou, A., Corre, Y.-M., Le Gac, P.-Y., Davies, P., César, G., & Bruzaud, S. (2014) · Polymer Degradation and Stability · doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.01.020 · Cited by 279
Cited by
3D printing filament as a second life of waste plastics—a review
Mikula, K., Skrzypczak, D., Izydorczyk, G., Warchoł, J., Moustakas, K., Chojnacka, K., & Witek-Krowiak, A. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-020-10657-8 · Cited by 382
Environmental and economic assessment on 3D printed buildings with recycled concrete
Han, Y., Yang, Z., Ding, T., & Xiao, J. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123884 · Cited by 322
Tripathi, N., Misra, M., & Mohanty, A. K. (2021) · ACS Engineering Au · doi:10.1021/acsengineeringau.1c00011 · Cited by 304
The Chemical Recycling of PLA: A Review
McKeown, P., & Jones, M. D. (2020) · Sustainable Chemistry · doi:10.3390/suschem1010001 · Cited by 294
“A recent study has considered the reuse of 3D printed PLA material in a closed-loop recycling process [63].”
BackgroundReview on the Degradation of Poly(lactic acid) during Melt Processing
Velghe, I., Buffel, B., Vandeginste, V., Thielemans, W., & Desplentere, F. (2023) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym15092047 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, P., Rao, C., Gu, F., Sharmin, N., & Fu, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 197
- Pages
- 1046-1055
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2810721923
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Close-looped recycling of polylactic acid used in 3D printing: An experimental investigation and life cycle assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.275
- The paper
- Zhao, P., Rao, C., Gu, F., Sharmin, N., & Fu, J. (2018). Close-looped recycling of polylactic acid used in 3D printing: An experimental investigation and life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.275
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.