The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental and economic assessment on 3D printed buildings with recycled concrete
Abstract
Abstract With increasing attention on sustainable development, 3D printing construction and recycled concrete have drawn extensive interest as emerging construction technology and novel building materials. At this intersection, we attempted to evaluate the environmental impact and economic benefit of 3D printed buildings made of recycled concrete employing life-cycle assessment tools. Goal and scope definition, materials and scenarios, life-cycle inventory analysis, life-cycle assessment impact, and interpretation were detailed based on the characteristics of concrete 3D printing to better quantify the sustainability potential of recycled concrete used in 3D printed buildings. We found that although increases in using recycled aggregate could produce less pollutant emissions, the environmental impact caused by 3D printing concrete construction is generally larger than traditional cast-in-situ concrete construction. This is because additional cement is required in the 3D printing process to maintain dependable concrete performance. From the economic perspective, 3D printing concrete construction technology has significant advantages over traditional cast-in-situ concrete construction, saving the heavy cost of formwork and labor. Such benefit is even more pronounced in geometrically irregular buildings. We also found that the cost of buildings made of recycled concrete decreased as the proportion of recycled aggregate increased, owing to the higher price of natural aggregate. This paper contributes to identifying key factors in the life-cycle evaluation of 3D printing construction with cementitious materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges
Ford, S., & Despeisse, M. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.150 · Cited by 1,889
Environmental management. Life cycle assessment. Principles and framework
(2013) · doi:10.3403/30151316 · Cited by 1,401
Mix design and fresh properties for high-performance printing concrete
Le, T. T., Austin, S. A., Lim, S., Buswell, R. A., Gibb, A. G. F., & Thorpe, T. (2012) · Materials and Structures · doi:10.1617/s11527-012-9828-z · Cited by 1,218
Automated construction by contour crafting—related robotics and information technologies
Khoshnevis, B. (2004) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2003.08.012 · Cited by 1,161
An overview of study on recycled aggregate concrete in China (1996–2011)
Xiao, J., Li, W., Fan, Y., & Huang, X. (2012) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.074 · Cited by 1,101
Self-citationVision of 3D printing with concrete — Technical, economic and environmental potentials
De Schutter, G., Lesage, K., Mechtcherine, V., Nerella, V. N., Habert, G., & Agusti-Juan, I. (2018) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.06.001 · Cited by 1,072
Hardened properties of high-performance printing concrete
Le, T. T., Austin, S. A., Lim, S., Buswell, R. A., Law, R., Gibb, A. G. F., & Thorpe, T. (2012) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.12.003 · Cited by 1,020
Green house gas emissions due to concrete manufacture
Flower, D. J. M., & Sanjayan, J. G. (2007) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1065/lca2007.05.327 · Cited by 912
Early age mechanical behaviour of 3D printed concrete: Numerical modelling and experimental testing
Wolfs, R. J. M., Bos, F. P., & Salet, T. A. M. (2018) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.001 · Cited by 846
Comparative environmental assessment of natural and recycled aggregate concrete
Marinković, S., Radonjanin, V., Malešev, M., & Ignjatović, I. (2010) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2010.04.012 · Cited by 818
Cited by
Post-Production Finishing Processes Utilized in 3D Printing Technologies
Kantaros, A., Ganetsos, T., Petrescu, F., Ungureanu, L., & Munteanu, I. (2024) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr12030595 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Han, Y., Yang, Z., Ding, T., & Xiao, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 278
- Pages
- 123884
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3081050669
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 17.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental and economic assessment on 3D printed buildings with recycled concrete. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123884
- The paper
- Han, Y., Yang, Z., Ding, T., & Xiao, J. (2021). Environmental and economic assessment on 3D printed buildings with recycled concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123884
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.