The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of hydrogen direct reduction for fossil-free steelmaking
Open accessAbstract
Climate policy objectives require zero emissions across all sectors including steelmaking. The fundamental process changes needed for reaching this target are yet relatively unexplored. In this paper, we propose and assess a potential design for a fossil-free steelmaking process based on direct reduction of iron ore with hydrogen. We show that hydrogen direct reduction steelmaking needs 3.48 MWh of electricity per tonne of liquid steel, mainly for the electrolyser hydrogen production . If renewable electricity is used the process will have essentially zero emissions. Total production costs are in the range of 361–640 EUR per tonne of steel, and are highly sensitive to the electricity price and the amount of scrap used. Hydrogen direct reduction becomes cost competitive with an integrated steel plant at a carbon price of 34–68 EUR per tonne CO2 and electricity costs of 40 EUR/MWh. A key feature of the process is flexibility in production and electricity demand, which allows for grid balancing through storage of hydrogen and hot-briquetted iron, or variations in the share of scrap used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Roles of Energy and Material Efficiency in Meeting Steel Industry CO 2 Targets
Milford, R. L., Pauliuk, S., Allwood, J. M., & Müller, D. B. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es3031424 · Cited by 254
Cited by
Rissman, J., Bataille, C., Masanet, E., Aden, N., Morrow, W. R., Zhou, N., Elliott, N., Dell, R., Heeren, N., Huckestein, B., et al. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114848 · Cited by 1,040
Ren, L., Zhou, S., Peng, T., & Ou, X. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110846 · Cited by 532
The production and application of hydrogen in steel industry
Liu, W., Zuo, H., Wang, J., Xue, Q., Ren, B., & Yang, F. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.123 · Cited by 499
The negative emission potential of alkaline materials
Renforth, P. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09475-5 · Cited by 403
A General Vision for Reduction of Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions from the Steel Industry
Holappa, L. (2020) · Metals · doi:10.3390/met10091117 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Vogl, V., Åhman, M., & Nilsson, L. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 203
- Pages
- 736-745
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2889165195
- Cited by
- 779
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of hydrogen direct reduction for fossil-free steelmaking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.279
- The paper
- Vogl, V., Åhman, M., & Nilsson, L. J. (2018). Assessment of hydrogen direct reduction for fossil-free steelmaking. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.279
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.