Cited by 254Iron and Steelmaking ProcessesClimate Change Policy and EconomicsEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

The Roles of Energy and Material Efficiency in Meeting Steel Industry CO 2 Targets

Open access
Milford, Rachel L., Pauliuk, Stefan, Allwood, Julian M., Müller, Daniel B.·2013·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Identifying strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from steel production requires a comprehensive model of the sector but previous work has either failed to consider the whole supply chain or considered only a subset of possible abatement options. In this work, a global mass flow analysis is combined with process emissions intensities to allow forecasts of future steel sector emissions under all abatement options. Scenario analysis shows that global capacity for primary steel production is already near to a peak and that if sectoral emissions are to be reduced by 50% by 2050, the last required blast furnace will be built by 2020. Emissions reduction targets cannot be met by energy and emissions efficiency alone, but deploying material efficiency provides sufficient extra abatement potential.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es3031424

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Milford, R. L., Pauliuk, S., Allwood, J. M., & Müller, D. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Allwood, Julian M.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2013-03-07
Volume
47
Issue
7
Pages
3455-3462
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2055307036
Cited by
254
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 4
FWCI
20.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) (acceptedVersion)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/G007217/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Iron and Steelmaking Processes
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
steel industry, CO2 emission reduction, greenhouse gas emissions, energy efficiency, material efficiency, blast furnace, mass flow analysis, supply chain emissions
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Carbon Dioxide, Industry, Reference Standards, Steel, Thermodynamics, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review