Incumbents and business model innovation for the sharing economy: implications for sustainability
Open accessAbstract
In addition to fostering the rise of new players in various sectors, the sharing economy has attracted the attention of established companies, the so-called ‘incumbents’. Some incumbents have joined the sharing economy to both reap its emerging opportunities and tackle newcomers' competition. The entry of incumbents comes at a time in which the sharing economy, still in its initial stages, is the ‘battlefield’ between actors defending its original sustainability promise, based on the efficient use of resources, social bonding, non-monetized relationships and power of the communities, and those supporting the need to compromise on the principles, to ensure the sharing economy's expansion. Given incumbents' size and power, their entry is likely to significantly affect the shape of the sharing economy. Our study explores the implications for environmental, social and economic value creation of the different ways in which incumbents are changing their existing business models to join the sharing economy. We develop a typology of business model innovation for sharing, which stems from the literature on sustainable business models in particular, and present illustrative cases of incumbents' entry in the sharing economy. For every type adopted by incumbents, the sustainability dimensions are subsequently explored, considering both the benefits and drawbacks of incumbents' entry in the sharing economy. The final section concludes, and discusses implications for research, practice and policy.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The sharing economy can increase social connections and employment options.
“It also has many positive effects; for example, it can increase social connections and employment options (Ciulli & Kolk, 2019).”
From Building trust in the sharing economy: Current approaches and future considerations (2021) · cites this paper as Ciulli & Kolk, 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Sharing Versus Pseudo-Sharing in Web 2.0
Belk, R. (2014) · The Anthropologist · doi:10.1080/09720073.2014.11891518 · Cited by 622 · cited 5× · see citing works
“…business models, which leverage incumbents' existing assets do, however, not create the social value that a ‘pure’ sharing business model is expected to produce, in terms of a ‘feeling of community’ (Belk, 2014b) and social bonding between participants (Acquier et al., 2017; Habibi et al., 2016).”
BackgroundInfluentialAntecedents of trust in the sharing economy: A systematic review
ter Huurne, M., Ronteltap, A., Corten, R., & Buskens, V. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.1667 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Bidmon, C. M., & Knab, S. F. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.198 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Dreyer, B., Lüdeke-Freund, F., Hamann, R., & Faccer, K. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.036 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Accor Hotels, 2016. AccorHotels becomes a world leader in the luxury Serviced Homes market by acquiring onefinestay. http://press.accorhotels.group/ accorhotels-becomes-a-world-leader-in-the-luxury-serviced-homes-market- by-acquiring-onefinestay/. (Accessed 12 January 2018).
- Annarelli, A., Battistella, C., Nonino, F., 2016. Product service system: a conceptual framework from a systematic review. J. Clean. Prod. 139, 1011e1032.
- Bocken, N.M.P., Short, S.W., Rana, P., Evans, S., 2014. A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. J. Clean. Prod. 65, 42e56.
- Cusumano, M., 2015. How traditional firms must compete in the sharing economy. Viewpoints. Commun. ACM. 58, 32e34.
- Denzin, N.K., 1978. The Research Act: a Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. McGraw-Hill, New York.
- Fieseler, C., Bucher, E., Hoffmann, C.P., 2017. Unfairness by design? The perceived fairness of digital labor on crowdworking platforms. J. Bus. Ethics 1e19. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3607-2. · DOI
- Frenken, K., Schor, J., 2017. Putting the sharing economy into perspective. Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans. 23, 3e10.
- Hannon, M., 2012. Co-evolution of Innovative Business Models and Sustainability Transitions: the Case of the Energy Service Company (ESCo) Model and the UK Energy System (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). University of Leeds, Leeds, England.
- Martin, E.W., Shaheen, S.A., 2011. Greenhouse gas emission impacts of carsharing in North America. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 12, 1074e1086.
- Nijland, H., van Meerkerk, J., 2017. Mobility and environmental impacts of car sharing in The Netherlands. Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans. 23, 84e91.
- Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., 2010. Business Model Generation: a Handbook for Vi- sionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. John Wiley & Sons.
- Palgan, Y.V., Zvolska, L., Mont, O., 2017. Sustainability framings of accommodation sharing. Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans. 23, 70e83.
- Tukker, A., 2015. Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economyea review. J. Clean. Prod. 97, 76e91.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Circularity Brokers: Digital Platform Organizations and Waste Recovery in Food Supply Chains
Ciulli, F., Kolk, A., & Boe-Lillegraven, S. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04160-5 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Self-citationBuilding trust in the sharing economy: Current approaches and future considerations
Räisänen, J., Ojala, A., & Tuovinen, T. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123724 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ciulli, F., & Kolk, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Kolk, Ans
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 214
- Pages
- 995-1010
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2908420541
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 33.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- The Netherlands Organisaton for Scientific ResearchThe Netherlands Organisaton for Scientific Research (NWO)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
- Keywords
- sharing economy, incumbent firms, business model innovation, sustainable business models, resource efficiency, value creation, environmental sustainability, social sustainability, economic sustainability, competition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review