Cited by 52Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementSustainable Design and DevelopmentGreen IT and Sustainability

Decreasing obsolescence with modular smartphones? – An interdisciplinary perspective on lifecycles

Proske, Marina, Jaeger-Erben, Melanie·2019·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.116

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Proske, M., & Jaeger-Erben, M.
Affiliations
Fraunhofer Institute for Reliability and Microintegration (DE)
Corresponding author
Proske, Marina
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
223
Pages
57-66
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2922295057
Cited by
52
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3
FWCI
7.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
  • Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
Keywords
obsolescence, environmental impact, user attachment, human-object relationship, rebound effect, product durability, functional performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review