Integrating Life Cycle Assessment, Monetised Externalities and Value Alignment for Strategic Reconfiguration of Circular Business Models: The Case of Smartphones
Open accessAbstract
The smartphone industry faces sustainability challenges from greenhouse gas emissions and resource depletion to growing e‐waste volumes. Circular business models have been proposed as a pathway to address these issues, yet their adoption remains limited, lacking integrative assessment frameworks that connect environmental performance with business viability. This study develops and applies such a framework combining life cycle assessment, monetisation of externalities via the eco‐cost method and a structured value alignment score. Using primary data from Fairphone 5 as a case study, four scenarios with increasing levels of circularity are analysed: (S0) a linear business‐as‐usual baseline, (S1) extended use with moderate user‐led repairs, (S2) long‐life use with intensified user‐led repairs and (S3) a product‐as‐a‐service model based on manufacturer‐led refurbishment. The results demonstrate that all circular business models outperform the linear baseline in terms of both environmental impacts and monetised externalities. Incremental models that extend product lifespans through user‐led repair (S1, S2) yield significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions (up to −46%) and eco‐costs (−36%). However, their strategic alignment is constrained by weakened consumer value propositions and original equipment manufacturing profitability. In contrast, a product‐as‐a‐service model (S3) achieves superior outcomes by internalising life cycle responsibility and aligning incentives with longevity and service quality, reflecting systemic reconfiguration of value logics. The study contributes theoretically by operationalising an integrated framework that bridges environmental metrics with strategic value dimensions to evaluate circular business models. Practically, it provides firms a structured tool for evaluating trade‐offs and advancing scalable pathways towards a sustainable circular economy.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This study develops and applies an integrated framework combining life cycle assessment, eco-cost monetisation of externalities, and a value alignment score to evaluate circular business model scenarios for smartphones. Using Fairphone 5 as a case, it finds all circular scenarios outperform the linear baseline environmentally and in monetised externalities, but a product-as-a-service model achieves the strongest strategic alignment while incremental repair/long-life models face value proposition and OEM profitability constraints.
Key findings
- All circular scenarios outperform the linear baseline S0. Relative to S0, GHG emissions fall by 32% in S1, 46% in S2, and 48% in S3. Total eco-costs are €66.17 for S0, €45.49 for S1 (−31%), €41.42 for S2 (−36%), and €41.01 for S3 (−38%) in the text; Table 5 lists totals of €45.59, €42.26, and €41.01 for S1–S3.
- Value alignment scores are S0 = 6.75, S1 = 11.50, S2 = 11.15, and S3 = 17.10. S2 scores slightly below S1 because longer lifespan weakens value capture and value proposition, while S3’s PaaS model achieves the highest score by internalising life cycle responsibility and aligning OEM incentives with longevity and service quality.
- Material mass and monetised burden diverge sharply: aluminium is ~37 wt% but only ~1.9% of material-related eco-costs, whereas gold is ~0.03 wt% but accounts for 45.6% of material-related eco-costs.
- S3’s eco-cost advantage over S2 is marginal (€1.25) despite two extra years of service life, because S3’s comprehensive refurbishment—cosmetic replacements, repairs, and upgrades—adds resource intensity that partly offsets use-phase gains.
Methods
- Single-case study of Fairphone 5 with cradle-to-grave LCA following ISO 14040/14044. Functional unit is 3 years of smartphone use. Primary data come from Fairphone’s ERP and bill of materials (>6700 components), supplemented by ecoinvent v3.10. Four OEM-perspective scenarios: S0 linear 3-year lifespan, no repairs; S1 5-year lifespan with user-led DIY repairs; S2 7-year lifespan with intensified user-led DIY repairs including battery replacement; S3 9-year PaaS leasing with manufacturer-led refurbishment and modular upgrades.
- Layer 2 monetises LCA midpoint impacts using the eco-cost method and prevention-cost logic, producing an Eco Cost Index (ECI). Standard Eco-Cost V3.0 factors are used where applicable; custom factors are derived for fossil resource depletion and mineral/metal depletion. Indicator weights are set to 1.
- Layer 3 uses a semi-qualitative Value Alignment Score (VAS) based on 20 sector-specific indicators across value creation, delivery, proposition, and capture. An expert panel scored each scenario on a 0–5 Likert scale; dimension weights are set equally to 1. Results are synthesised in an eco-cost versus VAS matrix.
Limitations
- The paper states that the single Fairphone 5 case, intentionally selected for its designed-for-circularity attributes, limits generalisability to products with different design constraints, market positions, customer segments, or regulatory environments. The eco-cost method covers only environmental externalities and excludes social impacts, especially upstream raw material extraction. The VAS includes subjective judgement despite literature-derived indicators and expert review, and alternative weighting schemes could change rankings. A detailed OEM financial analysis was deliberately excluded.
- The text also makes evident that the consumer perspective is excluded from the scenario analysis, the device’s material composition has approximately 1 wt% unspecified mass, and custom eco-cost factors rely on assumptions about ore grades, processing intensities, and substitution potentials. Equal weighting of VAS dimensions is a baseline choice that may not reflect stakeholder-specific priorities.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
49 of 96 cited sources checked · 9 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Nine impact categories emerge as more critical for the environmental profile of smartphones.
“Although the study covers a comprehensive set of 16 environmental impact indicators, nine impact categories emerge as more critical owing to their relevance to the environmental profile of smartphones (Clément et al. 2020;Sánchez et al. 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Clément et al. 2020 source
The Introduction (p. 3) explicitly limits this study to global warming potential over 100 years (GWP100). Its analysis does not assess 16 indicators or identify nine critical impact categories for smartphones. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Sánchez et al. 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
LCA's integration into business model innovation is limited, especially in the fast-paced smartphone sector.
“Despite LCA's robustness in revealing environmental hotspots, its integration into business model innovation (BMI) is limited, especially in the fast-paced smartphone sector where innovation cycles and profit motives impede the adoption and implementation of circular strategies (Rittershaus et al. 2025).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Rittershaus et al. 2025 source
The section “Strategic Adaptations in Value Creation” identifies shorter innovation cycles and uncertainty about profitability as barriers to circular practices in the mobile-phone industry. However, neither that section nor the passages retrieved for “LCA” and “life cycle assessment” say that LCA’s integration into business model innovation is limited or discuss its ability to reveal environmental hotspots. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Conventional LCA is not well suited to assess business models, as it neglects economic and socio-technical factors such as monetary flows and value-chain dynamics.
“Most critically, for business strategy, conventional LCA is not well suited to assess business models, as it neglects economic and socio-technical factors, such as monetary flows and value-chain dynamics, essential to corporate strategy (Goffetti et al. 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Goffetti et al. 2022 source
- Premisecitation
Interconnected barriers spanning financial, market, operational, organisational, policy, technological and intrinsic domains pose substantial systemic inertia, impeding CE implementation.
“However, interconnected barriers spanning financial, market, operational, organisational, policy, technological and intrinsic domains pose substantial systemic inertia, impeding CE implementation (Tura et al. 2019;Vermunt et al. 2019;Rizos and Bryhn 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Tura et al. 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Vermunt et al. 2019 source
Section 2.2 (page not supplied) identifies financial, organisational, knowledge-and-technology, supply-chain, market and institutional barriers to implementing circular business models; institutional barriers include regulations. The Discussion and conclusions (page not supplied) finds many barriers interlinked. The paper does not identify an intrinsic barrier domain or explicitly establish the broader claim of systemic inertia across CE implementation. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Rizos and Bryhn 2022 source
Section 2 identifies multiple financial, supply-chain, technological, consumer, organisational and policy barriers, and section 6 says no single policy instrument can address them all. Section 4.6 also describes an internal focus on linear processes that cannot easily change. The paper does not identify the quoted seven-domain classification, particularly a separate “intrinsic” domain, and its findings focus on the EEE sector rather than CE implementation generally. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
In smartphones, upstream processes, particularly extraction of raw materials and energy-intensive manufacturing of components, dominate the overall product footprint.
“In the case of smartphones, numerous studies identify upstream processes, particularly the extraction of raw materials and the energyintensive manufacturing of components, to dominate the overall product footprint (Clément et al. 2020;Cordella et al. 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Clément et al. 2020 source
Section 3.1.1 (p. 9) reports that production accounts for 70 ± 12% of smartphones’ greenhouse-gas footprint. Sections 3.2.1 (p. 13) and 5 (p. 25) identify component manufacturing, particularly integrated circuits, as an important contributor with substantial electricity use. The paper does not establish that raw-material extraction itself dominates, and its findings concern greenhouse-gas impact rather than every measure of product footprint. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Cordella et al. 2021 source
- Premisecitation
The circular economy lacks integrated, holistic assessment frameworks that can bridge environmental performance, monetised externalities and strategic viability.
“This disconnect highlights a persistent gap-although the CE concept is conceptually appealing, it lacks integrated, holistic assessment frameworks that can bridge environmental performance, monetised externalities and strategic viability (Tura et al. 2019;Vermunt et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Tura et al. 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Vermunt et al. 2019 source
The Introduction discusses barriers to adopting circular business models, and the Discussion and conclusions describes challenges to their economic viability. Neither section says that the circular economy lacks assessment frameworks integrating environmental performance, monetised externalities and strategic viability. Searches for those assessment terms found no passage addressing the claimed framework gap. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Prolonging the active use phase through strategies like reuse, repair and refurbishment can deliver greater environmental benefits than improving recycling rates alone by avoiding carbon- and resource-intensive manufacturing of new devices.
“Although improving recycling rates is necessary, studies demonstrate that prolonging the active use phase through strategies like reuse, repair and refurbishment can deliver greater environmental benefits by avoiding the carbon-and resource-intensive manufacturing of new devices (Pamminger et al. 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Pamminger et al. 2021 source
Section 4.2 reports lower global-warming and resource-depletion impacts for repair and refurbishment than for a linear smartphone scenario; section 5.1 links reuse of components to reduced production of new parts. The paper does not compare these strategies with improving recycling rates alone: section 3 says final end-of-life processes, including material recovery, are outside its scope. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The product-as-a-service model's approach to value creation and delivery is operationally demanding, requiring substantial upfront investment in a sophisticated reverse logistics network for professional repair and device management.
“The model's approach to value creation and delivery is also operationally demanding, requiring substantial upfront investment in a sophisticated reverse logistics network for professional repair and device management (Ylä-Mella et al. 2022;Brändström et al. 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Ylä-Mella et al. 2022 source
The Knowledge Gaps and Recommendations for Future Research section (page unavailable) says services for upgrading used phones are scarce and that expanding them poses technical and organizational challenges. It does not discuss a product-as-a-service model or say that substantial upfront investment in a reverse-logistics network is required for professional repair and device management. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Brändström et al. 2024 source
The E3 case description reports an IT-equipment service that plans repairs and manages product use, while §4.2.4 says a new reconditioning facility required high investment costs (page numbers unavailable). These passages support operational demands and costly repair infrastructure, but do not say that product-as-a-service models require substantial upfront investment in a sophisticated reverse-logistics network. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Tailoring a compelling value proposition is the primary hurdle for the product-as-a-service model, as it must overcome deeply ingrained consumer preferences for product ownership and concerns about long-term costs.
“Tailoring a compelling value proposition is the primary hurdle, as it must overcome deeply ingrained consumer preferences for product ownership and concerns about long-term costs (Boyer et al. 2021;Magnier and Mugge 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Boyer et al. 2021 source
The Discussion (page unavailable) says firms should adjust circular offerings to customer segments and that some customers prioritize low prices. It mentions a product-service system as a possible way to recirculate products, but does not identify tailoring its value proposition as the primary hurdle or report preferences for ownership and concerns about long-term costs. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Magnier and Mugge 2022 source
Section 2.3 discusses how consumers weigh the value and costs of replacing an owned product. It does not address product-as-a-service, a preference for ownership over that model, long-term service costs, or the claim that crafting a value proposition is its primary hurdle. Searches for product-as-a-service, ownership preferences, subscriptions, and long-term costs found no passage addressing those points; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
If circular business models supported by extensive repair ecosystems are perceived as economically burdensome or offering insufficient financial advantage over shorter-lived linear alternatives, their uptake will remain limited despite environmental or strategic circular economy alignment.
“Should CBMs supported by extensive repair ecosystems be perceived as economically burdensome or offering insufficient financial advantage over shorter-lived linear alternatives, their uptake will remain limited despite environmental or strategic CE alignment (Ylä-Mella et al. 2022;van der Velden et al. 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Ylä-Mella et al. 2022 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites van der Velden et al. 2023 source
The Regulating Repair section says repair can cost more than replacement, making consumers unlikely to pursue it, and identifies affordability as a barrier to repair-based business models. That supports the economic-barrier point, but the paper does not establish the broader claim about uptake of circular business models supported by extensive repair ecosystems, or assess whether strategic circular-economy alignment offsets that barrier. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The shift to a recurring revenue model introduces new complexities for value capture, necessitating different adjusted risk management strategies compared to traditional sales.
“Finally, the shift to a recurring revenue model introduces new complexities for value capture, necessitating different adjusted risk management strategies compared to traditional sales (Rizos and Bryhn 2022;Hunger et al. 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Rizos and Bryhn 2022 source
Section 2.1 (page unavailable) says circular business models can add complexity compared with linear models, including questions about ownership and how costs and benefits are shared. Sections 4.2 and 4.6 discuss leasing opportunities and the need for new internal processes. The copy does not establish that recurring revenue specifically creates these complexities or that it requires different risk-management strategies from traditional sales. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Hunger et al. 2024 source
- Premisecitation
A systemic approach to value creation necessitates optimising for end-of-life value recovery through design choices that enable easier disassembly and high-quality material recovery.
“Such a systemic approach also necessitates optimising for EoL value recovery through design choices that enable easier disassembly and high-quality material recovery (Pamminger et al. 2021;Gómez et al. 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Pamminger et al. 2021 source
The Goal and scope section says the paper guides decisions about circular end-of-use strategies for smartphones, supporting the broad point about considering value after first use. But it explicitly excludes design changes to ease those strategies, and the Method section excludes final end-of-life material recovery. The paper therefore does not support the specific prescription for easier disassembly and high-quality material recovery. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Gómez et al. 2023 source
Section 3.1 says components fastened with screws or rivets are easier to separate than materials joined by welding, binding or coating. The Introduction links component separation to material recovery, but the paper does not explicitly argue that a systemic approach necessitates design optimisation for high-quality end-of-life recovery. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Relying solely on user-led do-it-yourself repair efforts, while valuable, has inherent limitations for achieving widespread adoption beyond niche consumer segments.
“Relying solely on user-led DIY repair efforts, while valuable, has inherent limitations for achieving widespread adoption beyond niche consumer segments (van der Velden 2021; Prabhu and Majhi 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites van der Velden 2021 source
Section 2, “Product repair and the circular economy,” identifies barriers for self-repairers, including difficult product designs, unavailable parts, warranty loss, and restricted repair information. It also reports that repair becomes more likely when infrastructure is available. These passages support limits to relying on DIY repair alone, but the paper does not establish that DIY repair cannot spread beyond niche consumer segments. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Prabhu and Majhi 2023 source
The review’s “In-use lifespan of mobile phones” section says repair can extend a phone’s use, but that repairability has had only a marginal impact and that costs and consumer beliefs pose barriers. It also calls for viable repair services and accessible parts. It does not specifically assess user-led DIY repair or whether its adoption is confined to niche consumer segments. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Failing to meet evolving expectations for performance, features and user experience creates significant barriers, such as a loss of consumer trust and a stigma against aging devices, ultimately hindering the widespread adoption of circular business models.
“Failing to meet evolving expectations for performance, features and user experience creates significant barriers, such as a loss of consumer trust and a stigma against aging devices, ultimately hindering the widespread adoption of CBMs (Magnier and Mugge 2022;van den Berge et al. 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Magnier and Mugge 2022 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites van den Berge et al. 2023 source
Section 4.2.4 reports that improved TV performance and new features prompted replacement, while software incompatibility prompted early smartphone replacement. Section 4.1.2 also links early replacement to interest in features adopted by peers. The paper does not establish the claimed loss of consumer trust, stigma against aging devices, or resulting barrier to widespread adoption of circular business models. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Business model innovations that shift from product sales to service-based offerings align strongly with theoretical arguments positioning them as pivotal circular economy enablers.
“By contrast, BMIs that shift from product sales to service-based offerings align strongly with theoretical arguments positioning them as pivotal CE enablers (Rizos and Bryhn 2022;Conduit et al. 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
Sustainable outcomes require business models in which the revenue logic rewards lifetime performance rather than volume-based turnover.
“Sustainable outcomes require business models in which the revenue logic rewards lifetime performance rather than volume-based turnover (Kirchherr et al. 2017;Ferasso et al. 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Kirchherr et al. 2017 source
Section 3.4 describes business models as an enabler of the circular economy and quotes a definition based on longevity. Section 2.3 links circular-economy business models to sustainable development. Neither passage says that revenue should reward lifetime performance rather than volume-based turnover; that specific requirement is unsupported by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Ferasso et al. 2020 source
The Introduction says circular-economy models often move toward long-life solutions and that renting, leasing, or subscriptions might become more frequent. It does not say sustainable outcomes require revenue tied to lifetime performance rather than sales volume; the claim turns a possible shift into a requirement and adds a contrast the paper does not make. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
Fostering a sense of active partnership is fundamental to enabling business models that equitably share the costs and benefits resulting from a transition towards a circular economy.
“Fostering this sense of active partnership is fundamental to enabling business models that equitably share the costs and benefits resulting from a transition towards a CE (Rizos and Bryhn 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Rizos and Bryhn 2022 source
Section 2.1 (page unavailable) says successful implementation of circular business models is largely contingent on collaboration among supply-chain actors and identifies sharing costs and benefits as a challenge. Section 4.3 (page unavailable) also reports partnerships as a key enabler. Neither passage establishes that partnership produces business models that share those costs and benefits equitably. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
Firm-centric value capture mechanisms are only viable if they successfully facilitate a shift in the consumer's role from a passive end-user to an active partner in value co-creation.
“However, these firm-centric value capture mechanisms are only viable if they successfully facilitate a shift in the consumer's role from a passive end-user to an active partner in value co-creation (Neramballi et al. 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Neramballi et al. 2024 source
Section 3.3.1 (p. 4) says that developing circular PaaS value propositions requires a shift from unidirectional value delivery to co-creation with customers. Section 3.5.1 (p. 5) discusses value-capture elements, but does not say that firm-centric value-capture mechanisms are viable only if they bring about that shift. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
All circular business models (S1, S2, S3) outperform the linear business-as-usual baseline (S0) in monetised externalities.
“The results demonstrate that all circular business models outperform the linear baseline in terms of both environmental impacts and monetised externalities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All circular business models (S1, S2, S3) outperform the linear business-as-usual baseline (S0) in environmental impacts.
“The results demonstrate that all circular business models outperform the linear baseline in terms of both environmental impacts and monetised externalities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The strategic alignment of S1 and S2 is constrained by weakened consumer value propositions and original equipment manufacturing profitability.
“However, their strategic alignment is constrained by weakened consumer value propositions and original equipment manufacturing profitability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Incremental models that extend product lifespans through user-led repair (S1, S2) yield reductions in greenhouse gas emissions up to 46% compared to the linear baseline.
“Incremental models that extend product lifespans through user-led repair (S1, S2) yield significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions (up to -46%) and eco-costs (-36%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Incremental models that extend product lifespans through user-led repair (S1, S2) yield reductions in eco-costs of 36% compared to the linear baseline.
“Incremental models that extend product lifespans through user-led repair (S1, S2) yield significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions (up to -46%) and eco-costs (-36%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
S2 reduces greenhouse gas emissions by 46% relative to S0.
“S1 reduces GHGs by 32% relative to S0, and S2 and S3 by 46% and 48%, respectively (see Figure 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
- Findingnone given
Across all scenarios, the manufacturing and resource-extraction phases dominate life cycle impacts.
“Across all scenarios, the manufacturing and resource-extraction phases dominate the life cycle impacts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
In S1, value proposition shows only marginal improvement.
“By contrast, value proposition shows only marginal improvement, indicating that extending lifespan through DIY repair enhances operational and structural aspects of circularity more than it strengthens the perceived attractiveness of the offering.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The LCA quantified cradle-to-grave environmental burdens of the baseline scenario S0 and three CBM scenarios S1, S2 and S3 across sixteen EF 3.1 impact categories.
“The LCA quantified the cradle-to-grave environmental burdens of the baseline scenario (S0: Business-as-usual) and three distinct CBM scenarios (S1, S2 and S3) across sixteen EF 3.1 impact categories (Table 4) (Zampori and Pant 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zampori and Pant 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingreasoning
S2's more limited repair interventions deliver comparable life cycle improvements with lower refurbishment intensity.
“In contrast, S2's more limited repair interventions deliver comparable life cycle improvements with lower refurbishment intensity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
- Findingown data
Scenario S0 incurs the highest eco-cost of €66.17.
“Scenario S0 incurs the highest eco-cost of €66.17.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
- Findingown data
Scenario S3 substantially outperforms all other scenarios in strategic value alignment, with a VAS of 17.10.
“Although its total eco-cost (€41.01) is only marginally lower than S2, it substantially outperforms all other scenarios in terms of strategic value alignment (VAS: 17.10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Aluminium, the primary contributor by weight (~37 wt%), has a relatively modest eco-cost (~1.9%).
“For example, aluminium, the primary contributor by weight (~37 wt%), has a relatively modest eco-cost (~1.9%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The risk from the missing mass fraction is partially mitigated because the entire mineral and metal depletion category accounts for only about 10% of the total eco-cost in the baseline scenario S0.
“However, this risk is partially mitigated as the entire mineral and metal depletion category accounts for only about 10% of the total eco-cost in the baseline scenario (S0).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Scenario S2 has a VAS of 11.15, which is marginally lower than S1.
“Scenario S2 (VAS: 11.15) extends the lifespan further to 7 years, but its VAS is marginally lower than S1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
S1 reduces greenhouse gas emissions by 32% relative to S0.
“S1 reduces GHGs by 32% relative to S0, and S2 and S3 by 46% and 48%, respectively (see Figure 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
- Findingown data
Total eco-cost decreases markedly with increasing circularity.
“The results indicate that the total eco-cost (ECI s ) decreases markedly with increasing circularity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
- Findingreasoning
Similar, though less pronounced, observations were made for cobalt, terbium, silver and palladium-elements crucial for electronic functionalities but associated with substantial environmental prevention costs relative to their mass.
“Similar, though less pronounced, observations were made for cobalt, terbium, silver and palladium-elements crucial for electronic functionalities but associated with substantial environmental prevention costs relative to their mass.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Across all scenarios, the largest monetary burdens stem from human toxicity, climate change, water use and mineral and metal resource depletion.
“Across all scenarios, the largest monetary burdens stem from human toxicity, climate change, water use and mineral and metal resource depletion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
- Findingown data
S3 reduces greenhouse gas emissions by 48% relative to S0.
“S1 reduces GHGs by 32% relative to S0, and S2 and S3 by 46% and 48%, respectively (see Figure 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
- Findingown data
Scenario S2 has a slightly lower VAS (11.15) than scenario S1 (11.50).
“However, its slightly lower VAS (11.15) compared to S1 (11.50) highlights a crucial trade-off.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Approximately 1 wt% of the device's mass is unspecified.
“Nevertheless, due to complex alloys and the proprietary nature of supplier data, approximately 1 wt% of the device's mass is unspecified.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Gold, present in trace amounts (~0.03 wt%), overwhelmingly accounts for 45.6% of material-related eco-costs.
“In contrast, gold, present in trace amounts (~0.03 wt%), overwhelmingly accounts for 45.6% material-related eco-costs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is a pronounced divergence between material mass contribution and monetised environmental burden.
“A key finding from the eco-cost assessment is the pronounced divergence between material mass contribution and monetised environmental burden.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The most significant VAS gains in S1 occur in value creation, value delivery and value capture.
“The most significant gains occur in value creation (through product longevity and repairability), value delivery (via more accessible repair options) and value capture (through modest improvements in economic viability).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For other impact categories, scenarios S2 and S3 are the most favourable.
“When exploring other impact categories (4), scenarios S2 and S3 are the most favourable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
- Findingown data
Scenario S3 has a total eco-cost of €41.01, only marginally lower than S2.
“Although its total eco-cost (€41.01) is only marginally lower than S2, it substantially outperforms all other scenarios in terms of strategic value alignment (VAS: 17.10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Extending the product life cycle through circular strategies yields substantial reductions in environmental burdens.
“However, extending the PLC through circular strategies (CBMs) yields substantial reductions in environmental burdens.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
- Findingreasoning
S2's more targeted repair interventions deliver nearly equivalent environmental benefits at a lower refurbishment burden.
“In contrast, S2's more targeted repair interventions deliver nearly equivalent environmental benefits at a lower refurbishment burden.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
- Premisecitation
The integration of environmental and eco-cost assessments remains underdeveloped in the smartphone sector.
“Despite increasing attention to sustainable production and consumption, the integration of environmental and eco-cost assessments remains underdeveloped in the smartphone sector.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nguyen et al. 2016 source
- Premisenone given
Fairphone provides the complete underlying infrastructure including spare parts, manuals and repair services.
“Crucially, the device is designed for a long life and easy repair, and the company provides the complete underlying infrastructure, including spare parts, manuals and repair services.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The smartphone sector remains constrained by a narrow focus on end-of-life strategies, particularly recycling, while overlooking value retention strategies such as reuse, repair and refurbishment.
“Yet, the smartphone sector remains constrained by a narrow focus on end-of-life (EoL) strategies, particularly recycling while overlooking value retention strategies such as reuse, repair and refurbishment (Guo et al. 2023;Mayers et al. 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
In practice, circular business models often remain abstract and detached from robust performance data, limiting their diffusion and impact.
“In practice, however, CBMs often remain abstract and detached from robust performance data, limiting their diffusion and impact (Santa-Maria et al. 2022;Geissdoerfer et al. 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Santa-Maria et al. 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Geissdoerfer et al. 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Climate change is critical due to the high-energy demand during manufacturing and use.
“For example, climate change is critical due to the high-energy demand during manufacturing and use (Sánchez et al. 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sánchez et al. 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Short product lifespans substantially increase the per-unit footprint of smartphones when impacts are amortised over time.
“In the smartphone market, the prevailing trend of short lifespans, driven by rapid technological obsolescence, perceived obsolescence and limited repairability (Welfens et al. 2016;Proske and Jaeger-Erben 2019), substantially increases the per-unit footprint when impacts are amortised over time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Welfens et al. 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Proske and Jaeger-Erben 2019 source
- Premisecitation
Human and freshwater ecotoxicity account for harmful emissions from mining, component manufacturing and improper end-of-life treatment.
“Human and freshwater ecotoxicity account for harmful emissions from mining, component manufacturing and improper EoL treatment (Baldé et al. 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baldé et al. 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Scenario S3 is the most promising circular business model.
“In contrast, scenario S3 emerges as the most promising CBM.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
S3's slightly higher upstream resource and energy demands largely offset the anticipated benefits of its extended use phase.
“Notably, although S3 entails more extensive refurbishment and achieves a longer operational lifetime, its slightly higher upstream resource and energy demands largely offset the anticipated benefits of the extended use phase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
- Study design and conductreasoning
Additional uncertainties arise in the derivation of custom eco-cost factors for fossil and mineral resource depletion.
“Additional uncertainties arise in the derivation of custom ecocost factors for fossil and mineral resource depletion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The high eco-cost of gold is primarily due to the high-energy intensity, extensive ore processing and significant pollution associated with extracting and refining precious metals from low-grade ores.
“This is primarily due to the high-energy intensity, extensive ore processing and significant pollution associated with extracting and refining such precious metals from low-grade ores.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The anticipated environmental benefits of S3's extended lifespan are largely counterbalanced by the higher resource and energy intensity of its comprehensive refurbishment activities compared to S2's limited repair interventions.
“This suggests that the anticipated environmental benefits of S3's extended lifespan are largely counterbalanced by the higher resource and energy intensity associated with its comprehensive refurbishment activities, including cosmetic elements and extensive service offerings, compared to the limited repair interventions in S2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
- Interpretationreasoning
Extending lifespan through DIY repair enhances operational and structural aspects of circularity more than it strengthens the perceived attractiveness of the offering.
“By contrast, value proposition shows only marginal improvement, indicating that extending lifespan through DIY repair enhances operational and structural aspects of circularity more than it strengthens the perceived attractiveness of the offering.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The narrow eco-cost gap between S3 and S2 arises due to S3's comprehensive refurbishment under the product-service system model, which includes cosmetic replacements, repairs and upgrades.
“This narrow gap arises due to S3's comprehensive refurbishment under the product-service system model, which includes cosmetic replacements, repairs and upgrades.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
- Interpretationreasoning
By internalising life cycle responsibilities and realigning OEM incentives around longevity and service quality rather than unit sales, S3 demonstrates a more robust framework for creating and capturing value for all stakeholders.
“By internalising life cycle responsibilities and realigning OEM incentives around longevity and service quality rather than unit sales, S3 demonstrates a more robust framework for creating and capturing value for all stakeholders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Optimising for environmental performance alone, without ensuring that the circular business model remains attractive and economically sustainable for key stakeholders, may not lead to the most effective circular economy transition or foster widespread adoption of sustainable practices.
“This finding suggests that optimising for environmental performance alone, without ensuring that the CBM remains attractive and economically sustainable for key stakeholders, may not lead to the most effective CE transition or foster widespread adoption of sustainable practices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The missing fraction's potential impact is significant because trace materials like gold carry disproportionately high eco-cost.
“While numerically minor, this missing fraction's potential impact is significant, as trace materials like gold carry disproportionately high eco-cost.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
S2's lower VAS stems from weaker performance in value capture and value proposition.
“This stems from weaker performance in value capture and value proposition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
S0's score reflects minimal engagement with circular value creation, delivery, proposition or capture.
“As a conventional sales model with a 3-year lifespan and no repair options, its score reflects minimal engagement with circular value creation, delivery, proposition or capture.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The progressive decline in eco-costs from S0 through S3 reflects the benefits of circular business models.
“The progressive decline in eco-costs from S0 through S3 reflects the benefits of CBMs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
- Interpretationreasoning
Environmental gains do not automatically translate into stronger strategic alignment.
“This finding highlights that environmental gains do not automatically translate into stronger strategic alignment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The primary source of uncertainty in the eco-cost assessment lies in the device's material composition, rather than the eco-cost factors themselves.
“It should be noted that the primary source of uncertainty in the eco-cost assessment lies in the device's material composition, rather than the eco-cost factors themselves.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Eco-cost factors derived from prevention-based abatement costs are more stable than market-based commodity prices and less sensitive to short-term pricing volatility.
- Interpretationreasoning
Merely extending the product life cycle through user initiative, without concurrent business model innovations that sustain both consumer value and OEM returns, may yield diminishing returns in strategic circular economy alignment.
“These trade-offs illustrate that merely extending PLC through user initiative, without concurrent business model innovations that sustain both consumer value and OEM returns, may yield diminishing returns in strategic CE alignment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The overall structure of the framework is generalisable to other industries.
“Finally, although the indicators used here were tailored to the smartphone sector to capture contextual barriers and enablers of circularity, the overall structure of the framework is generalisable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The synergy between S3's environmental and strategic performance reflects the systemic advantages of the product-as-a-service model.
“This synergy reflects the systemic advantages of the PaaS model”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The analysis indicates a consistent and significant trend of improved environmental performance with the adoption of circular strategies and more efficient resource utilisation over an extended product life cycle.
“Nonetheless, the analysis of the results for both scenarios indicates a consistent and significant trend of improved environmental performance with the adoption of circular strategies and more efficient resource utilisation over an extended PLC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
- Interpretationown data
Circular business models consistently reduce eco-costs relative to the linear baseline, even under conservative assumptions.
“To summarise, whereas uncertainties in input data and cost factor derivation remain, CBMs consistently reduce eco-costs relative to the linear baseline, even under conservative assumptions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
- Interpretationown data
Considerable benefits can arise from relatively simple circular interventions such as DIY repairs and moderate lifespan extension.
“This demonstrates the considerable benefits that can arise from relatively simple circular interventions such as DIY repairs and moderate lifespan extension.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
- Interpretationcitation
Maximising longevity through product-centric attributes can lead to a point of diminishing returns, beyond which the model's strategic alignment and overall viability begin to decline without additional systemic interventions, especially when such interventions fail to generate and sustain value for all key stakeholders.
“Instead, this approach can lead to a point of diminishing returns, beyond which the model's strategic alignment and overall viability begin to decline without additional systemic interventions, especially when such interventions fail to generate and sustain value for all key stakeholders (Graessler and Pottebaum 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Graessler and Pottebaum 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Innovating value propositions is central to circular business model viability, as the transition demands more than just environmentally sound products.
“Therefore, innovating value propositions is central to CBM viability, as the transition demands more than just environmentally sound products.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Simply maximising longevity through product-centric attributes like repairability or physical durability does not automatically yield enhanced circularity or business model resilience.
“The results show that simply maximising longevity through product-centric attributes like repairability or physical durability does not automatically yield enhanced circularity or business model resilience.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Slowing strategies such as reuse, repair and refurbishment have value.
“This affirms the value of slowing strategies such as reuse, repair and refurbishment (Wieser and Tröger 2018;Bocken 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Wieser and Tröger 2018 source
- cites Bocken 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Closing material loops requires overcoming the systemic challenge through an efficient reverse logistics system.
“This involves overcoming the systemic challenge of closing material loops through an efficient reverse logistics system (Thapa et al. 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Thapa et al. 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Without ecosystem-level integration, even the most well-designed circular product risks falling short of its circular potential.
“Without this ecosystem-level integration, even the most well-designed circular product risks falling short of its circular potential.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Actively strategising for mitigating rebound effects potentially caused by circular practices ensures that efficiency gains translate to net positive environmental outcomes and are not compromised by accelerated consumption.
“Furthermore, actively strategising for mitigating rebound effects, potentially caused by circular practices, ensures that efficiency gains translate to net positive environmental outcomes and are not compromised by accelerated consumption (Evans and Vermeulen 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Evans and Vermeulen 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Service-based business models' ability to systemically address operational barriers, such as reverse logistics and service quality, allows for a fundamental reconfiguration of the value framework itself.
“Their ability to systemically address operational barriers, such as reverse logistics and service quality (Evans and Vermeulen 2021;Thapa et al. 2023), allows for a fundamental reconfiguration of the value framework itself.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Evans and Vermeulen 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Thapa et al. 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
The VAS-eco-cost synthesis reveals that environmental optimisation and strategic circularity do not necessarily move in parallel.
“In summary, the VAS-eco-cost synthesis reveals that environmental optimisation and strategic circularity do not necessarily move in parallel.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Real-world success of a reconfigured circular value architecture hinges not only on superior circular design and environmental benefits but equally on overcoming operational and market complexities inherent to that architecture.
“These challenges underscore that real-world success hinges not only on a superior circular design and its environmental benefits but equally on overcoming operational and market complexities inherent to this reconfigured circular value architecture.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The effectiveness of design for repair or refurbishment is ultimately dependent on the participation of stakeholders in collaborative networks for professional servicing and advanced material recovery.
“The effectiveness of design for repair or refurbishment is ultimately dependent on the participation of stakeholders in collaborative networks for professional servicing and advanced material recovery (Richter et al. 2023;Shevchenko et al. 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Richter et al. 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Shevchenko et al. 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Widespread circular economy adoption requires sophisticated infrastructure for returns, parts and quality-assured services.
“Widespread CE adoption requires sophisticated infrastructure for returns, parts and quality-assured services.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
For value creation to be scalable, it must extend beyond the firm to the entire value network.
“Finally, for value creation to be scalable, it must extend beyond the firm to the entire value network (Dembek et al. 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dembek et al. 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
Applied to the Fairphone 5 case, the framework demonstrates how environmental impacts, the intensity of circular interventions, business model design and consumer value interact to shape both environmental performance and strategic alignment.
“Applied to the Fairphone 5 case, it demonstrates how environmental impacts, the intensity of circular interventions, business model design and consumer value interact to shape both environmental performance and strategic alignment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Product-as-a-service also facilitates continuous and bidirectional information exchange, a principle often highlighted in literature but neglected in practice.
“Furthermore, PaaS also facilitates continuous and bidirectional information exchange, a principle often highlighted in literature but neglected in practice (Ahmad et al. 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ahmad et al. 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Service-based models achieve stronger outcomes precisely because they reconfigure value creation, delivery, proposition and capture simultaneously.
“By contrast, service-based models achieve stronger outcomes precisely because they reconfigure value creation, delivery, proposition and capture simultaneously.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The superiority of a circular business model is determined by the systemic interplay of its value creation, delivery and capture mechanisms, not just by its adherence to a single circular principle.
“Emphasising the need to assess CBMs from a holistic value framework perspective, as the superiority of a model is determined by the systemic interplay of its value creation, delivery and capture mechanisms, not just by its adherence to a single circular principle.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This aligns original equipment manufacturer profitability directly with product longevity, resource efficiency and customer satisfaction.
“This aligns OEM profitability directly with product longevity, resource efficiency and customer satisfaction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The main barrier to transition is not just technological (e.g., repair infrastructure and reverse logistics) but contractual instead.
“Secondly, the findings indicate that the main barrier to transition is not just technological (e.g., repair infrastructure and reverse logistics) but contractual instead.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
While policies like the right-to-repair and extended producer responsibility are valuable, they are insufficient on their own.
“At the same time, the results show that while policies like the RtR and EPR are valuable, they are insufficient on their own.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The feedback loop from product-as-a-service delivers value outward by providing stakeholders with consistent information on repairability, spare part availability and end-of-life options.
“This feedback loop delivers value outward by providing stakeholders with consistent information on repairability, spare part availability and EoL options.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Ensuring multi-stakeholder value capture, especially for the implementing original equipment manufacturer, is fundamental to the long-term sustainability of circular business models.
“Ensuring multi-stakeholder value capture, especially for the implementing OEM, is fundamental to the long-term sustainability of CBMs (Centobelli et al. 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Centobelli et al. 2020 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Business models that retain product stewardship, such as product-as-a-service, are inherently incentivised and better positioned to optimise reverse logistical flows, ensuring high-quality professional interventions and efficient material management.
“Business models that retain product stewardship, such as a PaaS, are inherently incentivised and better positioned to optimise reverse logistical flows, ensuring high-quality professional interventions and efficient material management.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Proactive circular business models are better positioned to navigate and even leverage evolving regulatory frameworks.
“Furthermore, proactive CBMs are better positioned to navigate and even leverage the evolving regulatory frameworks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The findings challenge the simplistic view of pursuing an isolated product longevity approach.
“Empirically, the findings enrich debates on the hierarchy of R-strategies and challenge the simplistic view of pursuing an isolated product longevity approach.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Environmental gains and strategic viability do not always move in parallel.
“A key theoretical contribution lies in demonstrating that environmental gains and strategic viability do not always move in parallel.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The single product case limits the generalisability of the findings.
“However, this also limits the generalisability of the findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 62
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 40
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA circular economy requires LCA to analyse environmental trade-offs across the entire product life cycle, linking to value creation and capture dynamics to enable strategic decision-making.
“Although these methods suit a productfocused linear economy, a circular economy (CE) requires LCA to analyse environmental trade-offs across the entire product life cycle, linking to value creation and capture dynamics to enable strategic decision-making (Goffetti et al. 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Goffetti et al. 2022 source
Sections 5.1 and 5.2 distinguish product-centred conventional LCA from BM-LCA, which connects physical life-cycle flows with business costs, revenues and profitability. Section 6 says that this connection helps companies evaluate environmental performance and strategic options. The paper supports that approach for circular business models, but does not say conventional LCA is suited only to a linear economy or that a circular economy requires LCA generally to link value-creation and value-capture dynamics. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLCA is effective in systematically accounting for impacts across entire life cycle stages and highlighting environmental hotspots in resource extraction, component manufacturing, assembly, transport, use phase and end-of-life.
“in systematically accounting for impacts across the entire life cycle stages and highlighting environmental hotspots in resource extraction, component manufacturing, assembly, transport, use phase and EoL (Goffetti et al. 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Goffetti et al. 2022 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Fairphone 5 overcomes common linear product challenges, making it an ideal case for evaluating CBM potential while minimising hypothetical assumptions.
“As the Fairphone 5 overcomes common linear product challenges, it serves as an ideal case for evaluating CBM potential while minimising hypothetical assumptions that could skew results (Hazelwood and Pecht 2021;Jugend et al. 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Hazelwood and Pecht 2021 source
Section VIII (Consumer Protection; page unavailable) describes the Fairphone as designed for repairability and upgradability, supporting the idea that it addresses some common smartphone-design challenges. It does not identify the Fairphone 5 or say that it is an ideal case for evaluating CBM potential or minimising hypothetical assumptions. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Jugend et al. 2024 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCE seeks to enhance resource productivity by narrowing, slowing and closing material and energy loops.
“CE seeks to enhance resource productivity by narrowing (enhancing efficiency), slowing them (extending use) and closing them (reclaiming resources) material and energy loops (Kirchherr et al. 2017;Konietzko et al. 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Kirchherr et al. 2017 source
The paper’s definition in §2.3 (page not provided) describes CE through reducing, reusing, recycling and recovering materials, which broadly corresponds to using fewer resources, extending use and reclaiming resources. It does not state the specific narrowing–slowing–closing framework or describe enhancing resource productivity across both material and energy loops as CE’s aim. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Konietzko et al. 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLife cycle-extending strategies such as repair, refurbishment, leasing or component harvesting can partially offset declining sales by generating after-sales revenues while simultaneously lowering manufacturing expenditures through reduced demand for new units and components.
“Life cycle-extending strategies such as repair, refurbishment, leasing or component harvesting can partially offset declining sales by generating after-sales revenues while simultaneously lowering manufacturing expenditures through reduced demand for new units and components (Geissdoerfer et al. 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Geissdoerfer et al. 2020 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisereasoningThere is a need for integrated assessment frameworks combining environmental, economic and potentially social dimensions, supported by robust, standardised metrics.
“Consequently, there is an urgent need for integrated assessment frameworks combining environmental, economic and potentially social dimensions, supported by robust, standardised metrics (Corona et al. 2019;Centobelli et al. 2020;van Loon et al. 2021;Jerome et al. 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationEstablished methods like life cycle assessment and true cost accounting can evaluate sustainability performance and provide critical data, but they are rarely incorporated into business model design or evaluation.
“Established methods like life cycle assessment (LCA) and true cost accounting (TCA) can evaluate sustainability performance and provide critical data, but they are rarely incorporated into business model design or evaluation (de Giacomo and Bleischwitz 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites de Giacomo and Bleischwitz 2020 source
In the passage labelled ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (page unavailable), the review says some authors used life cycle analysis to evaluate environmental burdens and inform sustainable business-model design. Our copy does not address true cost accounting or establish that either method is rarely incorporated into business-model design or evaluation. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEnd-of-life management generally contributes only a relatively small proportion to total life cycle impact compared to the manufacturing stage.
“Finally, although EoL management is crucial for resource recovery and for mitigating hazardous emissions such as landfill leachate (Forti et al. 2020), it generally contributes only a relatively small proportion to the total life cycle impact compared to the manufacturing stage (He et al. 2020;Bruno et al. 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites He et al. 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Bruno et al. 2022 source
The available passage on manual dismantling discusses material recovery and labour costs, not life-cycle impacts. Searches for end-of-life impacts relative to manufacturing found no passage in our copy that makes that comparison. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationStandard conversion factors from the Eco-Cost V3.0 database were directly applicable for most EF 3.1 impact categories, but depletion indicators for fossil resources and minerals and metals required custom factor derivation owing to the lack of universally accepted unit costs.
“While standard conversion factors from the Eco-Cost V3.0 database (Vogtländer et al. 2019) were directly applicable for most EF 3.1 impact categories, depletion indicators for fossil resources and for minerals and metals required custom factor derivation owing to the lack of universally accepted unit costs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Vogtländer et al. 2019 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationScoring was guided by a structured rubric derived from sector-specific CE literature and scenario attributes and was further subjected to expert review.
“To mitigate this, scoring was guided by a structured rubric derived from sector-specific CE literature and scenario attributes (Rittershaus et al. 2025) and was further subjected to expert review.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Rittershaus et al. 2025 source
The Methodology section describes a coding framework for mobile-phone circular-economy barriers and enablers, with categories drawn from the literature. It does not describe a scoring rubric derived from scenario attributes. The citation is attached to the rubric’s basis, not to the subsequent expert review, so expert review is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlthough extending the product life cycle promotes sufficiency, it can simultaneously erode the perceived consumer value proposition if products are perceived as outdated.
“Although extending the PLC promotes sufficiency, it can simultaneously erode the perceived consumer value proposition if products are perceived as outdated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe circular economy transition requires offerings that resonate with evolving consumer needs and challenge entrenched consumption patterns.
“It requires offerings that resonate with evolving consumer needs and challenge entrenched consumption patterns (Boyer et al. 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Boyer et al. 2021 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationService-oriented offerings transform value propositions from static ownership to dynamic access, guaranteeing performance and evolving functionality.
“Service-oriented offerings transform value propositions from static ownership to dynamic access, guaranteeing performance and evolving functionality (Poppelaars et al. 2018;Centobelli et al. 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Poppelaars et al. 2018 source
Section 2 describes a shift from a one-time transfer of ownership to an ongoing access relationship. The paper also recommends a dynamically adapted value proposition, including software updates, and constant access to a technically similar smartphone. These are recommendations, not a guarantee of performance or evolving functionality. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Centobelli et al. 2020 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCommon barriers to circular business models include consumers' reluctance to use technologically dated products and original equipment manufacturers' uncertainty about revenue and profit in increasingly dematerialised value chains.
“Common barriers include consumers' reluctance to use technologically dated products and OEMs' uncertainty about revenue and profit in increasingly dematerialised value chains (Tunn et al. 2020;van der Velden et al. 2023).”
- Also stated in: § 5 | Discussion: Implication for CBMs · plain
“This occurs because consumers resist outdated devices and OEMs face revenue uncertainty in dematerialised value chains (Tunn et al. 2020;Graessler and Pottebaum 2021;van der Velden et al. 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Tunn et al. 2020 source
The Introduction (page unavailable) says many consumers are unenthusiastic about access-based product-service systems and still value ownership. It does not link that reluctance to technologically dated products. The passages found on digitalisation and business models do not address OEMs’ uncertainty about revenue or profit in dematerialised value chains. (LLM, conf=0.79)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites van der Velden et al. 2023 source
The Regulating Repair section (page unavailable) identifies consumer attitudes and preferences as barriers to repair-based business models. It does not say consumers are reluctant to use technologically dated products, and the passages on business models and conclusions do not describe OEM uncertainty about revenue or profit in dematerialised value chains. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Graessler and Pottebaum 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § 5 | Discussion: Implication for CBMs · plain
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEfficiently managed take-back and refurbishment systems within a product-service system can turn extended producer responsibility obligations into value recovery opportunities, whereas high-quality, accessible service offerings can build brand loyalty in line with right-to-repair mandates, rather than treating them merely as compliance burdens.
“For instance, efficiently managed take-back and refurbishment systems within a PSS can turn EPR obligations into value recovery opportunities, whereas high-quality, accessible service offerings can build brand loyalty in line with RtR mandates, rather than treating them merely as compliance burdens (Rizos and Bryhn 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Rizos and Bryhn 2022 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSingle-dimensional assessments obscure trade-offs, whereas multilayered frameworks reveal both tensions and synergies.
“Singledimensional assessments obscure trade-offs, whereas multilayered frameworks reveal both tensions and synergies (de Giacomo and Bleischwitz 2020; Goffetti et al. 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites de Giacomo and Bleischwitz 2020 source
Section 3.2.4 discusses the need to consider financial alongside environmental and social performance, and Section 4.4 identifies tensions between social value creation and private value capture. The paper does not establish that single-dimensional assessments obscure trade-offs or that multilayered frameworks reveal both tensions and synergies; it presents further study of these relationships as a research avenue. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Goffetti et al. 2022 source
Section 5.3 says business-model canvas tools can miss interconnections, while BM-LCA measures them; Section 6 says conventional LCA covers fewer business-model elements than BM-LCA. The paper also examines environmental performance alongside profitability, supporting the idea that a broader assessment can expose tensions and potential win-win outcomes. It does not establish the claim for single-dimensional assessments and multilayered frameworks in general. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationReverse logistics systems, by providing convenient and incentivised take-back options, encourage widespread consumer participation, facilitate multistakeholder collaboration, and enable the return of value to the original equipment manufacturer, thereby catalysing a resilient service ecosystem.
“Such systems, by providing convenient and incentivised take-back options, not only encourage widespread consumer participation (Cordova-Pizarro et al. 2020;Ylä-Mella et al. 2022) but also facilitate multistakeholder collaboration and enable the return of value to the OEM, thereby catalysing a resilient service ecosystem.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites Cordova-Pizarro et al. 2020 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Ylä-Mella et al. 2022 source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataScenario S1 has an eco-cost of €45.49, a reduction of 31% relative to S0.
“The circular scenarios offer substantial reductions, with S1 at €45.49 (-31%), S2 at €41.42 (-36%) and S3 achieving the lowest total eco-cost at €41.01 (-38%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataS2 and S3 achieve the lowest total impacts, with particularly pronounced reductions in freshwater ecotoxicity, fossil resource use and water use.
“Both scenarios achieve the lowest total impacts, with particularly pronounced reductions in 'freshwater ecotoxicity', 'fossil resource use' and 'water use'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningAlthough S3 achieves the lowest overall eco-cost, its €1.25 advantage over S2 is marginal despite two extra years of service life.
“Although S3 achieves the lowest overall eco-cost, its €1.25 advantage over S2 is marginal despite two extra years of service life.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningS3 excels in value delivery and enhances the value proposition.
“S3 excels in value delivery and enhances the value proposition (e.g., maintaining technological relevance and novelty through periodic upgrades and comprehensive service offerings).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningScenario S3 has a VAS of 17.10, the highest score, reflecting systemic reconfiguration as a product-as-a-service model.
“By contrast, scenario S3 (VAS: 17.10) achieves the highest score, reflecting systemic reconfiguration as a PaaS model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningScenario S0 has a VAS of 6.75 and exhibits the weakest circular economy alignment.
“Scenario S0 (VAS: 6.75) exhibits the weakest CE alignment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataScenario S1 has a VAS of 11.50, with increases across all four value dimensions.
“Introducing DIY repairs and extending product lifespan in scenario S1 (VAS to 11.50), with increases across all four value dimensions, highlighting the initial strategic value in enabling PLE.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataScenario S2 has a total eco-cost of €42.26, making it the second most favourable scenario from a purely monetised externalities perspective.
“Scenario S2 offers a further reduction in environmental burden (€42.26),making it the second most favourable scenario from a purely monetised externalities perspective.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataScenario S3 achieves the lowest total eco-cost at €41.01, a reduction of 38% relative to S0.
“The circular scenarios offer substantial reductions, with S1 at €45.49 (-31%), S2 at €41.42 (-36%) and S3 achieving the lowest total eco-cost at €41.01 (-38%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataScenario S1 demonstrates a significant improvement in both parameters compared to S0, reducing eco-costs by approximately 31% while increasing VAS by 70%.
“Scenario S1 demonstrates a significant improvement in both parameters compared to S0, reducing eco-costs by approximately 31% while increasing VAS by 70%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe baseline scenario S0 represents the least desirable option, incurring the highest environmental burden (€66.17) while exhibiting the lowest VAS (6.75).
“The baseline scenario, S0, evidently represents the least desirable option, incurring the highest environmental burden (€66.17) while exhibiting the lowest VAS (6.75).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataS2 and S3 reduce impacts for acidification and particulate matter by over 50% and for ozone depletion by more than 60%.
“Furthermore, they demonstrate substantial improvements in other key impact categories, reducing impacts for 'acidification' and 'particulate matter' by over 50% and for 'ozone depletion' by an even greater margin of 60%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataScenario S2 has an eco-cost of €41.42, a reduction of 36% relative to S0.
“The circular scenarios offer substantial reductions, with S1 at €45.49 (-31%), S2 at €41.42 (-36%) and S3 achieving the lowest total eco-cost at €41.01 (-38%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor climate change, scenario S0 exhibits the highest greenhouse gas emissions, whereas S1-S3 achieve progressively lower burdens.
“For the impact category climate change, scenario S0 exhibits the highest greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), whereas S1-S3 achieve progressively lower burdens.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAll circular approaches outperform the linear baseline in terms of environmental burdens and monetised externalities.
“The comparative integrated assessment confirms that all circular approaches outperform the linear baseline in terms of environmental burdens and monetised externalities.”
- Also stated in: § 5 | Discussion: Implication for CBMs · boosted
“The comparative integrated assessment of four distinct smartphone CBM scenarios confirmed clear advantages of all circular approaches over the linear baseline.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 5 | Discussion: Implication for CBMs · boosted
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOwnership-retaining service models, such as the product-service system, outperform other circular business model models by simultaneously reducing externalised environmental costs and achieving higher alignment with circular value logics.
“The results show that ownership-retaining service models, such as the PSS, outperform other CBM models by simultaneously reducing externalised environmental costs and achieving higher alignment with circular value logics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningRefurbishment-based models also show meaningful improvements over business-as-usual, though their contribution to systemic circularity remains more limited.
“Refurbishment-based models also show meaningful improvements over business-asusual, though their contribution to systemic circularity remains more limited.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough S3 incorporates interventions like refurbishment and upgrades, which might be considered lower R-strategies than repair and reuse in S1 and S2, it still outperforms both ecologically and strategically.
“Although S3 incorporates interventions like refurbishment and upgrades, which, judging by a purely hierarchical perspective, might be considered lower R-strategies than repair and reuse in S1 and S2, it still outperforms both ecologically and strategically.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe LCA was conducted in accordance with ISO 14040 and 14044 standards.
“an LCA was conducted in accordance with ISO 14040 and 14044 standards.”
- Also stated in: § 3.2 | Framework in Detail 3.3 | LCA · plain
“an LCA was conducted in accordance with ISO 14040 and 14044 standards (ISO 2006a(ISO , 2006b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § 3.2 | Framework in Detail 3.3 | LCA · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe Fairphone 5 case provides a benchmark for what is possible under optimal conditions.
“This case thus provides a benchmark for what is possible under optimal conditions, enabling focused analysis of CBMs without the confounding effects of product design limitations or hypothetical assumptions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationTCA translates environmental and social externalities into monetary terms, revealing hidden costs of production and consumption systems.
“TCA offers a complementary perspective by translating environmental and social externalities into monetary terms, thereby revealing the hidden costs of production and consumption systems (Michalke et al. 2025).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Michalke et al. 2025 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTCA, by monetising hidden environmental and social costs, makes externalities visible but remains disconnected from firm-level value creation and capture logics.
“TCA, by monetising hidden environmental and social costs, makes externalities visible but similarly remains disconnected from firmlevel value creation and capture logics (Michalke et al. 2025).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Michalke et al. 2025 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCBMI serves as a critical strategic lever for transformation, reconfiguring value creation, delivery and capture to align with CE principles.
“CBMI serves as a critical strategic lever for this transformation, reconfiguring value creation, delivery and capture to align with CE principles (Geissdoerfer et al. 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Geissdoerfer et al. 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenInnovation frameworks frequently assume environmental benefits based on circularity principles yet rarely subject these assumptions to quantitative validation through methods such as LCA or TCA.
“On one hand, innovation frameworks frequently assume environmental benefits based on circularity principles yet rarely subject these assumptions to quantitative validation through methods such as LCA or TCA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
PremisereasoningThe Fairphone 5 embeds circular principles throughout its life cycle.
“We intentionally selected the Fairphone 5 as an exemplary case because it embeds circular principles throughout its life cycle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPractical application of comprehensive frameworks like LCSA for guiding BMI faces hurdles including exceptional complexity, data intensity and disaggregated results difficult for managers to transfer into strategic decisions.
“However, the practical application of such comprehensive frameworks for guiding BMI faces its own hurdles, including exceptional complexity, data intensity and disaggregated results that are difficult for managers to transfer into strategic decisions (Elias Mota et al. 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Elias Mota et al. 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningResearch on circular business models remains fragmented, with CBMI and implementation often treated as distinct and isolated domains, and a significant research gap manifests.
“Despite these advances on CBMs, research remains fragmented, with CBMI and implementation often being treated as distinct and isolated domains, and a significant research gap with two critical characteristics manifests.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenResearch on supply chain contributions tends to emphasise infrastructural coordination, often in isolation from broader questions of both strategic and ecological viability.
“Meanwhile, research on supply chain contributions tends to emphasise infrastructural coordination, often in isolation from broader questions of both strategic and ecological viability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe eco-cost methodology is grounded in the principle of prevention costs, expressing environmental burdens as marginal costs of mitigating emissions and resource depletion to levels within Earth's ecological carrying capacity.
“The eco-cost methodology is grounded in the principle of prevention costs, whereby environmental burdens are expressed as marginal costs of mitigating emissions and resource depletion to levels that remain within the Earth's ecological carrying capacity (Vogtländer 2025).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Vogtländer 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe Fairphone 5 is designed for long life and easy repair.
“Crucially, the device is designed for a long life and easy repair, and the company provides the complete underlying infrastructure, including spare parts, manuals and repair services.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAdoption-focused studies highlight contextual enablers of CBMs but offer limited analytical tools for evaluating trade-offs across economic, environmental and social value dimensions.
“On the other hand, adoption-focused studies highlight contextual enablers of CBMs but offer limited analytical tools for evaluating the trade-offs that arise across economic, environmental and social value dimensions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningS1 highlights the strategic potential of enabling product lifetime extension while also revealing the limits of such interventions in reshaping the value proposition.
“Overall, S1 highlights the strategic potential of enabling PLE while also revealing the limits of such interventions in reshaping the value proposition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAlthough S2 is environmentally more efficient per functional unit over its extended product life cycle, its strategic alignment and perceived circular business model viability show a marginal decline relative to S1.
“Although S2 is environmentally more efficient per FU over its extended PLC, its strategic alignment and perceived CBM viability show a marginal decline.”
- Also stated in: § 5 | Discussion: Implication for CBMs · plain
“Scenario S2 exemplifies this-although environmentally more efficient per FU, its strategic alignment declines relative to S1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 5 | Discussion: Implication for CBMs · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataTransportation distances, repair frequencies and device failure rates were obtained from Fairphone's ERP system and are thus highly reliable, but these operational parameters may not be fully generalisable beyond the case context.
“Similarly, although transportation distances, repair frequencies and device failure rates were obtained from Fairphone's ERP system and are thus highly reliable, these operational parameters may not be fully generalisable beyond the case context.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAn Excel-based scoring sheet was circulated among domain experts, who provided independent ratings and feedback, which were subsequently integrated to refine the scoring rubric.
“An Excel-based scoring sheet was circulated among domain experts, who provided independent ratings and feedback, which were subsequently integrated to refine the scoring rubric.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAny underestimated eco-cost would affect linear scenarios more heavily, thereby strengthening the findings that favour circular business models.
“Consequently, any underestimated eco-cost would affect linear scenarios more heavily, thereby strengthening the findings that favour CBMs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe expert review step improved consistency and reduced evaluator bias.
“This step improved consistency and reduced evaluator bias, though more formal inter-rater reliability testing could strengthen future applications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe final VAS scoring still involves a degree of expert judgement.
“Although this validation process adds rigour, it is important to acknowledge that the final scoring still involves a degree of expert judgement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAssumptions regarding average ore grades, processing intensities and substitution potentials may affect the precision of absolute eco-cost values.
“Here, assumptions regarding average ore grades, processing intensities and substitution potentials may affect the precision of absolute values.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenDespite its strong performance, the practical viability of the product-as-a-service model (S3) is constrained by several real-world challenges.
“Despite its strong performance, the practical viability of the PaaS model ( S3) is constrained by several real-world challenges.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataEach scenario was evaluated against every indicator by an expert panel using a 0-5 Likert scale, with scores substantiated by scenario-specific attributes.
“Each scenario was evaluated against every indicator by an expert panel, using a 0-5 Likert scale (0 = no alignment; 5 = optimal alignment), with scores substantiated by scenario-specific attributes (e.g., design for longevity an repair infrastructure).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe assignment of scores on the 0-5 scale involves qualitative judgement and thus carries an element of subjectivity.
“Firstly, the assignment of scores on a 0-5 scale involves qualitative judgement and thus carries an element of subjectivity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningApplication to other industries would require sector-specific adaptation of indicators and potential recalibration of weighting schemes.
“Application to other industries would, however, requires sector-specific adaptation of indicators and potential recalibration of weighting schemes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe longer 7-year span undermines economic viability assurance for the OEM and reduces technological relevance and competitiveness for consumers.
“Specifically, the longer span of 7 years undermines 'economic viability assurance' for the OEM and reduces 'technological relevance and competitiveness' for consumers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe LCA findings do not capture environmental externalities or strategic alignment within a broader circular economy framework.
“Although the LCA findings provide critical insights into the relative performance of the assessed CBMs, they do not capture environmental externalities or strategic alignment within a broader CE framework.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningFor service-centric models to drive circular economy adoption, their value proposition must extend beyond functional benefits and convenience.
“However, for such service-centric models to drive CE adoption, their value proposition must extend beyond functional benefits and convenience.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBy internalising life cycle responsibility, service-based models realign original equipment manufacturer incentives with product longevity and performance, enabling new forms of value capture and evolving value propositions to consumers.
“By internalising life cycle responsibility, these models realign OEM incentives with product longevity and performance, enabling new forms of value capture and evolving value propositions to consumers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningService-centric models must also address the deeply ingrained consumer preference for novelty and navigate the psychological aspects of access versus ownership.
“It must also address the deeply ingrained consumer preference for novelty and navigate the psychological aspects of 'access versus ownership'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningSystematising value delivery is critical for the scalability, resilience and ultimate success of circular economy operations within the smartphone industry.
“Systematising value delivery is critical for the scalability, resilience and ultimate success of CE operations within the smartphone industry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEnvironmental optimisation alone is insufficient, and firms must align business model logics with consumer value and long-term viability.
“Strategically, these findings demonstrate that environmental optimisation alone is insufficient, and firms must align business model logics with consumer value and long-term viability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hobson 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Corvellec et al. 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationExtending lifespans through slowing strategies yields clear environmental benefits, but these benefits plateau when pursued without systemic circular business model innovation.
“The comparative assessment reveals that extending lifespans through slowing strategies yields clear environmental benefits (Wieser and Tröger 2018;Bocken 2021), but these benefits plateau when pursued without systemic CBMI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Wieser and Tröger 2018 source
- cites Bocken 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisecitationTruly impactful circular business models embed circular principles directly into the product architecture and the underlying business model logic itself.
“Although these features are foundational, truly impactful CBMs embed circular principles directly into the product architecture and the underlying business model logic itself (Geissdoerfer et al. 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Geissdoerfer et al. 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIncremental extensions of lifespan (S1, S2) improve environmental performance but may weaken business viability and consumer value if pursued in isolation.
“Incremental extensions of lifespan (S1, S2) improve environmental performance but may weaken business viability and consumer value if pursued in isolation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationInnovating the value proposition for a circular economy involves not just new service layers or product features but also transparently demonstrating compelling economic and experiential value that can successfully compete with, and ultimately reshape, the prevailing linear consumption paradigm.
“Therefore, innovating the value proposition for a CE involves not just new service layers or product features but also transparently demonstrating compelling economic and experiential value that can successfully compete with, and ultimately reshape, the prevailing linear consumption paradigm (Centobelli et al. 2020;Geissdoerfer et al. 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Centobelli et al. 2020 source
- cites Geissdoerfer et al. 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningSuccess of circular economy transitions depends on addressing the critical infrastructural, market and supply chain challenges that shape practical implementation.
“At the same time, success depends on addressing the critical infrastructural, market and supply chain challenges that shape practical implementation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSystemic business model innovation (S3) enables both better environmental outcomes and stronger alignment across value dimensions.
“In contrast, systemic BMI (S3) enables both better environmental outcomes and stronger alignment across value dimensions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningAdvancing circular economy transitions requires integrating environmental efficiency with economically and socially sustainable value architectures.
“The results thus highlight that advancing CE transitions requires integrating environmental efficiency with economically and socially sustainable value architectures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningAlternative weighting schemes reflecting varied stakeholder perspectives or alternative product typologies could potentially lead to different scenario rankings.
“Yet, alternative weighting schemes reflecting varied stakeholder perspectives or alternative product typologies could potentially lead to different scenario rankings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningUser-led repair is a valid starting point for circularity but fails to actualise the full environmental and economic potential inherent in a product.
“As demonstrated in this study, user-led repair is a valid starting point for circularity but fails to actualise the full environmental and economic potential inherent in a product.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe capacity for nuanced, multifaceted evaluation facilitates more informed, resilient and strategically sound circular business model development.
“This capacity for nuanced, multifaceted evaluation is what facilitates more informed, resilient and strategically sound CBM development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThis partnership is realised through consumer engagement in feedback loops, participation in upgrade programs, responsible use and timely product returns.
“Although direct repair is professionalised, this partnership is realised through consumer engagement in feedback loops, participation in upgrade programs, responsible use and timely product returns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe applied eco-cost method focuses exclusively on environmental externalities and does not account for social impacts, particularly those arising in upstream raw material extraction.
“Secondly, the applied eco-cost method focuses exclusively on environmental externalities and does not account for social impacts, particularly those arising in upstream raw material extraction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIntegrated frameworks are crucial for revealing and managing inherent trade-offs and identifying potent synergistic opportunities.
“As demonstrated thus far, such integrated frameworks are crucial for revealing and managing inherent trade-offs and identifying potent synergistic opportunities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe study refrained from a detailed internal financial analysis from the original equipment manufacturer perspective as a conscious choice for its scope, prioritising evaluating strategic circular economy alignment, monetised externalities and environmental sustainability.
“Finally, refraining from a detailed internal financial analysis from the OEM perspective was a conscious choice for this study's scope, which prioritised evaluating the strategic CE alignment, monetised externalities and environmental sustainability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningTo mitigate VAS subjectivity, the indicators were derived from a comprehensive literature review and validated through expert feedback, and a hierarchical weighting system was used to reflect their relative strategic importance.
“To mitigate this, several strategies were employed: the indicators themselves were derived from a comprehensive literature review and validated through expert feedback; furthermore, a hierarchical weighting system was used to reflect their relative strategic importance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe analysis is based on a single product case, intentionally selected for its designed-for-circularity attributes.
“Firstly, the analysis is based on a single product case, intentionally selected for its 'designed-forcircularity' attributes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBy shifting from selling products to selling performance, access or outcomes, businesses can generate revenue through service fees or upgrade options and by maximising the retained asset value from controlled returns and remarketing of refurbished devices or components.
“By shifting from selling products to selling performance, access or outcomes, businesses can generate revenue through service fees or upgrade options and by maximising the retained asset value from controlled returns and remarketing of refurbished devices or components (Konietzko et al. 2020;Hobson 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Konietzko et al. 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Hobson 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe specific results and the relative performance of the scenarios may differ significantly for products from companies with different design constraints, market positions, customer segments or regulatory environments.
“The specific results and the relative performance of the scenarios may differ significantly for products from companies with different design constraints, market positions, customer segments or regulatory environments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataEco-cost analysis highlights the disproportionate environmental burden of trace materials like gold, suggesting a basis for policies that incentivise the reduction of virgin material use, for instance through targeted resource taxes.
“Eco-cost analysis highlights the disproportionate environmental burden of trace materials like gold, suggesting a basis for policies that incentivise the reduction of virgin material use, for instance, through targeted resource taxes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningAdopting integrated approaches to evaluating circular business models is needed.
“A critical methodological implication of this study is the need for adopting integrated approaches to evaluating CBMs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIncremental extensions of product life (as in S1 and S2) reduce impacts but risk diminishing strategic returns unless supported by business model innovation.
“Incremental extensions of product life (as in S1 and S2) reduce impacts but risk diminishing strategic returns unless supported by business model innovation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe VAS provides a transparent and systematic scoring rubric but inherently includes a degree of subjectivity.
“Thirdly, although the VAS provides a transparent and systematic scoring rubric, it inherently includes a degree of subjectivity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe feedback loop allows original equipment manufacturers and service providers to gather data on device condition and usage, which is essential for predicting maintenance needs and scaling service capacity to guarantee continuous value delivery.
“Simultaneously, it allows OEMs and service providers to gather data on device condition and usage, which is essential for predicting maintenance needs and also for scaling service capacity to guarantee continuous value delivery.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
“Key exclusions from the system boundary include peripheral accessories (e.g., chargers, screen protectors and cases) and supporting digital infrastructure (e.g., mobile networks).This is justified on the basis that these are assumed to be consistently used across all scenarios, thereby not affecting the comparative outcome.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Eco-cost factors derived from prevention-based abatement costs are more stable than market-based commodity prices and less sensitive to short-term pricing volatility.
“The latter are derived from prevention-based abatement costs, which are deemed to be more stable than market-based commodity prices and therefore less sensitive to short-term pricing volatility.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
S1 eco-cost categories do not sum to the reported total
MajorThe nine S1 category values in Table 5 sum to €50.22, not the reported €45.59. This changes the size of S1's reported reduction relative to the baseline.
Reported 45.59 · recomputed 50.22
“Total eco-Cost (ECI s ) €66.17 €45.59 €42.26 €41.01”
S3 eco-cost categories do not sum to the reported total
MajorThe nine S3 category values in Table 5 sum to €42.64, rather than €41.01.
Reported 41.01 · recomputed 42.64
“Total eco-Cost (ECI s ) €66.17 €45.59 €42.26 €41.01”
S2 eco-cost categories do not sum to the reported total
MajorThe nine S2 category values in Table 5 sum to €45.00, rather than €42.26.
Reported 42.26 · recomputed 45
“Total eco-Cost (ECI s ) €66.17 €45.59 €42.26 €41.01”
Stated S3 advantage does not follow from the adjacent S2 value
MinorThe prose gives S2 and S3 eco-costs of €41.42 and €41.01, a difference of €0.41, not €1.25. The €1.25 difference instead matches Table 5's separate S2 value of €42.26.
Reported 1.25 · recomputed 0.41
“Although S3 achieves the lowest overall eco-cost, its €1.25 advantage over S2 is marginal despite two extra years of service life.”
Two different S2 eco-cost totals are reported
MinorThe eco-cost results give S2 a total of €41.42, whereas the synthesis gives €42.26, matching Table 5. The difference also affects the stated comparison with S3.
“S2 at €41.42 (-36%)”
“Scenario S2 offers a further reduction in environmental burden (€42.26)”
Two different S1 eco-cost totals are reported
MinorThe results prose gives S1 an eco-cost of €45.49, while Table 5 reports €45.59.
“with S1 at €45.49 (-31%)”
“Total eco-Cost (ECI s ) €66.17 €45.59 €42.26 €41.01”
Cites
The Circular Economy–A new sustainability paradigm?
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 · Cited by 9,360 · see citing works
Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 · Cited by 8,550 · see citing works
Business Model Generation : A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010) · Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research · Cited by 6,870 · see citing works
A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes
Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039 · Cited by 4,366 · see citing works
Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda
Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007 · Cited by 2,469 · see citing works
Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future
Govindan, K., Soleimani, H., & Kannan, D. (2014) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.012 · Cited by 2,029 · see citing works
Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy – a review
Tukker, A. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.049 · Cited by 1,961 · see citing works
Evans, S., Vladimirova, D., Holgado, M., Van Fossen, K., Yang, M., Silva, E. A., & Barlow, C. Y. (2017) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1939 · Cited by 1,370 · see citing works
Circular business models: a review
Geissdoerfer, M., Pieroni, M. P. P., Pigosso, D. C. A., & Soufani, K. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123741 · Cited by 1,089 · see citing works
Critiques of the circular economy
Corvellec, H., Stowell, A. F., & Johansson, N. (2021) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.13187 · Cited by 1,004 · see citing works
Corona, B., Shen, L., Reike, D., Rosales Carreón, J., & Worrell, E. (2019) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104498 · Cited by 987 · see citing works
Unlocking circular business: A framework of barriers and drivers
Tura, N., Hanski, J., Ahola, T., Ståhle, M., Piiparinen, S., & Valkokari, P. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.202 · Cited by 706 · see citing works
Designing business models in circular economy: A systematic literature review and research agenda
Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Chiaroni, D., Del Vecchio, P., & Urbinati, A. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2466 · Cited by 672 · see citing works
Circular economy business models: The state of research and avenues ahead
Ferasso, M., Beliaeva, T., Kraus, S., Clauss, T., & Ribeiro‐Soriano, D. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2554 · Cited by 588 · see citing works
Circular ecosystem innovation: An initial set of principles
Konietzko, J., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119942 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
Sjödin, D., Parida, V., Jovanovic, M., & Visnjic, I. (2019) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12516 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
Value Creation and Value Capture in Open Innovation
Chesbrough, H. W., Lettl, C. U., & Ritter, T. (2018) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12471 · Cited by 497 · see citing works
Lüdeke‐Freund, F. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2396 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Exploring barriers to implementing different circular business models
Vermunt, D. A., Negro, S. O., Verweij, P. A., Kuppens, D. V., & Hekkert, M. P. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.052 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Circular economy business models and operations management
Jabbour, A. B. L. D. S., Luiz, J. V. R., Luiz, O. R., Jabbour, C. J. C., Ndubisi, N. O., de Oliveira, J. H. C., & Hourneaux, F. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.349 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Drivers and barriers for circular business model innovation
Geissdoerfer, M., Santa‐Maria, T., Kirchherr, J., & Pelzeter, C. (2022) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3339 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Santa‐Maria, T., Vermeulen, W. J. V., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2956 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Fernandes, S. D. C., Pigosso, D. C. A., McAloone, T. C., & Rozenfeld, H. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120507 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Tapaninaho, R., & Heikkinen, A. (2022) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3002 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Business Models for the Circular Economy
OECD (2019) · OECD eBooks · doi:10.1787/g2g9dd62-en · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Wieser, H., & Tröger, N. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.106 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Consumer behavior in the circular economy: Developing a product-centric framework
Шевченко, Т., Saidani, M., Ranjbari, M., Kronenberg, J., DANKO, Y. I., & Laitala, K. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135568 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Stakeholder views on extended producer responsibility and the circular economy
Kunz, N., Mayers, K., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2018) · California Management Review · doi:10.1177/0008125617752694 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Attanasio, G., Preghenella, N., Toni, A. F. D., & Battistella, C. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2922 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Rizos, V., & Bryhn, J. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130617 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Шевченко, Т., Laitala, K., & DANKO, Y. I. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11092656 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
The Sufficiency-Based Circular Economy—An Analysis of 150 Companies
Bocken, N. M. P., Nießen, L., & Short, S. W. (2022) · Frontiers in Sustainability · doi:10.3389/frsus.2022.899289 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Bithas, K. (2011) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.014 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Why do users (not) repair their devices? A study of the predictors of repair practices
Jaeger-Erben, M., Frick, V., & Hipp, T. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125382 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Business management perspectives on the circular economy: Present state and future directions
Ahmad, F., Bask, A. H., Laari, S., & Robinson, C. V. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122182 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
van Loon, P., Diener, D. L., & Harris, S. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125627 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Comparative life cycle assessment of smartphone reuse: repurposing vs. refurbishment
Zink, T., Maker, F., Geyer, R., Amirtharajah, R., & Akella, V. (2014) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-014-0720-7 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Welfens, M. J., Nordmann, J., & Seibt, A. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.082 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
The limits of the loops: critical environmental politics and the Circular Economy
Hobson, K. (2020) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2020.1816052 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
‘Fixing the World One Thing at a Time’: Community repair and a sustainable circular economy
van der Velden, M. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127151 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Comparison of Different Monetization Methods in LCA: A Review
Arendt, R., Bachmann, T. M., Motoshita, M., Bach, V., & Finkbeiner, M. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su122410493 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
LCA data quality: A management science perspective
Bicalho, T., Sauer, I. L., Rambaud, A., & Altukhova, Y. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.229 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Ren, Q., & Albrecht, J. (2023) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107761 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Life Cycle Assessment of a Smartphone
Ercan, M., Malmodin, J., Bergmark, P., Kimfalk, E., & Nilsson, E. (2016) · International Conference on ICT for Sustainability (ICT4S) · doi:10.2991/ict4s-16.2016.15 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Mapping and testing circular economy product-level indicators: A critical review
Jerome, A., Helander, H., Söderman, M. L., & Janssen, M. (2021) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106080 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Nguyen, T. L. T., Laratte, B., Guillaume, B., & Hua, A. (2016) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.01.018 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Sources of variation in life cycle assessments of smartphones and tablet computers
Clément, L.-P. P.-V. P., Jacquemotte, Q. E. S., & Hilty, L. M. (2020) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106416 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Norris, S., Hagenbeck, J., & Schaltegger, S. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2851 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Digitalised product-service systems: Effects on consumers’ attitudes and experiences
Tunn, V. S. C., van den Hende, E. A., Bocken, N. M. P., & Schoormans, J. P. L. (2020) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105045 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Business models for environmental sustainability: Contemporary shortcomings and some perspectives
De Giacomo, M. R., & Bleischwitz, R. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2576 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Makov, T., & Fitzpatrick, C. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127561 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Replaced too soon? An exploration of Western European consumers’ replacement of electronic products
Magnier, L., & Mugge, R. (2022) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106448 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Recycling is not enough to make the world a greener place: Prospects for the circular economy
Guo, J., Ali, S., & Xu, M. (2023) · Green Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.greenca.2023.10.006 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Cordella, M., Alfieri, F., & Sanfelix, J. (2021) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.13119 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Méndez‐León, E., Reyes, T., & Díaz‐Pichardo, R. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2871 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Stewart, R., Fantke, P., Bjørn, A., Owsianiak, M., Molin, C., Hauschild, M. Z., & Laurent, A. (2018) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2241 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Interpretation of comparative LCAs: external normalization and a method of mutual differences
Prado, V., Wender, B. A., & Seager, T. P. (2017) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-017-1281-3 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Thapa, K., Vermeulen, W. J. V., Deutz, P., & Olayide, O. E. (2022) · Business Strategy & Development · doi:10.1002/bsd2.222 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Towards sustainable business models with a novel life cycle assessment method
Goffetti, G., Böckin, D., Baumann, H., Tillman, A., & Zobel, T. (2022) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3005 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Poppelaars, F., Bakker, C., & Van Engelen, J. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10072133 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Brown, P., & Bajada, C. (2018) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2069 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Gómez, M., Grimes, S., Qian, Y., Feng, Y., & Fowler, G. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138099 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Tabas, A. M., Rehman, M. A., Khitous, F., & Urbinati, A. (2024) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3989 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Barriers to adopting circular business models: a cross‐sectoral analysis
Brändström, J., Jazairy, A., & Roos Lindgreen, E. (2024) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3653 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Decreasing obsolescence with modular smartphones? – An interdisciplinary perspective on lifecycles
Proske, M., & Jaeger-Erben, M. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.116 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Untangling business model outcomes, impacts and value
Dembek, K., Lüdeke‐Freund, F., Rosati, F., et al. (2022) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3249 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Life cycle cost analysis for recycling high-tech minerals from waste mobile phones in China
He, P., Feng, H., Hu, G., et al. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119498 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Böckin, D., Goffetti, G., Baumann, H., Tillman, A., & Zobel, T. (2022) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2022.04.014 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Prabhu N, S., & Majhi, R. (2023) · Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy · doi:10.1177/0734242x221105429 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Modelling of different circular end-of-use scenarios for smartphones
Pamminger, R., Glaser, S., & Wimmer, W. (2021) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-021-01869-2 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Richter, J. L., Svensson-Höglund, S., Dalhammar, C. J., Russell, J. D., & Thidell, Å. (2022) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.13315 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Circular value chain blind spot – A scoping review of the 9R framework in consumption
Hunger, T., Arnold, M., & Ulber, M. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140853 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
End-of-Use vs. End-of-Life: When Do Consumer Electronics Become Waste?
Ylä-Mella, J., Keiski, R. L., & Pongrácz, E. (2022) · Resources · doi:10.3390/resources11020018 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Consumer Demand for Circular Products: Identifying Customer Segments in the Circular Economy
Boyer, R. H. W., Hunka, A. D., & Whalen, K. A. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132212348 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Gräßler, I., & Pottebaum, J. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11104516 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Cao, D., Puntaier, E., Gillani, F., Chapman, D., & Dewitt, S. (2024) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3960 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Cordova-Pizarro, D., Aguilar-Barajas, I., Rodriguez, C. A., & Romero, D. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10217744 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Impact of modularity as a circular design strategy on materials use for smart mobile devices
Schischke, K., Proske, M., Nissen, N. F., & Schneider‐Ramelow, M. (2019) · MRS Energy & Sustainability · doi:10.1557/mre.2019.17 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Circular product design challenges: An exploratory study on critical barriers
Jugend, D., dos Santos, H. H., Garrido, S., Siqueira, R. M., & Mesa, J. A. (2024) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3703 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
van den Berge, R., Magnier, L., & Mugge, R. (2023) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.13372 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Bocken, N. M. P. (2020) · Encyclopedia of the UN sustainable development goals · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-95867-5_48 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Opportunities for reducing the supply chain water footprint of metals used in consumer electronics
Madaka, H., Babbitt, C. W., & Ryen, E. G. (2021) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105926 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Kim, C. H., Kuah, A. T. H., & Thirumaran, K. (2022) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2022.01.006 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Life Extension of Electronic Products: A Case Study of Smartphones
Hazelwood, D. A., & Pecht, M. G. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3121733 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Evans, R., & Vermeulen, W. J. V. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122952 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Proske, M. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134283 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Vogtländer, J., Peck, D., & Kurowicka, D. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11082446 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
The Role of Independent Repair in a Circular and Regenerative Economy
van der Velden, M., Maitre-Ekern, E., & Wanja, D. K. (2024) · Circular Economy and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43615-023-00304-y · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Mota, B., Carvalho, A. I. C. D. S. G., Gomes, M. I., et al. (2019) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2352 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Bruno, M., Sotera, L., & Fiore, S. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114677 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Toward a policy landscape to support the product‐as‐a‐service design process for a circular economy
Neramballi, A., Milios, L., Sakao, T., & Matschewsky, J. (2024) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.13535 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Centemeri, L. (2009) · e-cadernos CES · doi:10.4000/eces.266 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
User circularity practices: Adopting a user stewardship perspective for a circular economy
Conduit, J., Karpen, I. O., & Willmott, T. (2023) · AMS Review · doi:10.1007/s13162-023-00262-6 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Emerging Business Model Archetypes in the Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review
Woldeyes, T. D., Muffatto, M., & Ferrati, F. (2025) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.3348 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Civera, C., Moggi, S., Chiaudano, V., et al. (2025) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.70142 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
How the Dead Storage of Consumer Electronics Creates Consumer Value
Nøjgaard, M., Smaniotto, C., Askegaard, S., Cimpan, C., Zhilyaev, D., & Wenzel, H. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12145552 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Circular Business Model Frameworks: A Review
Islam, M. T., Iyer-Raniga, U., & Ali, A. (2024) · Highlights of Sustainability · doi:10.54175/hsustain3020010 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Junge, I. P. (2023) · Circular Economy and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43615-023-00292-z · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Rittershaus, P., Aryan, V., & Renner, M. (2025) · WIREs Energy and Environment · doi:10.1002/wene.70006 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationTrue Cost Accounting: Assessing Environmental and Social Damages of Production
Michalke, A., Kunz, J., & Gaugler, T. (2025) · doi:10.4324/9781003345190 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
THE CIRCULAR ECONOMY: A Slippery Step on the Path to Sustainability?
Mayers, K., Davis, T., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2023) · Management and Business Review · doi:10.1177/2694105820230303008 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
True Cost Accounting as Part of Accounting
Michalke, A., Kunz, J., & Gaugler, T. (2025) · True Cost Accounting · doi:10.4324/9781003345190-7
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Rizos V., 2019, Identifying the Impact of the Circular Economy on the Fast‐Moving Consumer Goods Industry. Opportunities and Challenges for Business, Workers and Consumers: Mobile Phones as an Example
Cited by
Sorted by citations
D’Adamo, I., Meester, S. D., Leo, S. D., et al. (2026) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.70954 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Liyanawatta, T., & Teo, M. M. (2026) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings16091652
- Authors
- Rittershaus, P., Aryan, V., Sánchez, D., Renner, M., & Poeppelbuss, J.
- Affiliations
- Fraunhofer Institute for Environmental, Safety and Energy Technology UMSICHT (DE)
- Fraunhofer Institute for Reliability and Microintegration (DE)
- Chair for Industrial Sales and Service Engineering Ruhr University Bochum Bochum Germany
- Corresponding author
- Rittershaus, Philipp
- Venue
- Business Strategy and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-10-15
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1880-1901
- ISSN
- 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0836
- OpenAlex
- W4415218786
- Semantic Scholar
- 51ed640a2695405ed04c0f85d9e1999dc7036001
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 100
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3
- FWCI
- 2.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Business Strategy and the Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Keywords
- circular business models, smartphones, value alignment, product-as-a-service, product durability, electronic waste, greenhouse gas emissions, circular economy, value logic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-18.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-18.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review