Cited by 3Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

Integrating Life Cycle Assessment, Monetised Externalities and Value Alignment for Strategic Reconfiguration of Circular Business Models: The Case of Smartphones

Open access
Rittershaus, Philipp, Aryan, Venkat, Sánchez, David, Renner, Manfred, Poeppelbuss, Jens·2026·Business Strategy and the Environment

Abstract

The smartphone industry faces sustainability challenges from greenhouse gas emissions and resource depletion to growing e‐waste volumes. Circular business models have been proposed as a pathway to address these issues, yet their adoption remains limited, lacking integrative assessment frameworks that connect environmental performance with business viability. This study develops and applies such a framework combining life cycle assessment, monetisation of externalities via the eco‐cost method and a structured value alignment score. Using primary data from Fairphone 5 as a case study, four scenarios with increasing levels of circularity are analysed: (S0) a linear business‐as‐usual baseline, (S1) extended use with moderate user‐led repairs, (S2) long‐life use with intensified user‐led repairs and (S3) a product‐as‐a‐service model based on manufacturer‐led refurbishment. The results demonstrate that all circular business models outperform the linear baseline in terms of both environmental impacts and monetised externalities. Incremental models that extend product lifespans through user‐led repair (S1, S2) yield significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions (up to −46%) and eco‐costs (−36%). However, their strategic alignment is constrained by weakened consumer value propositions and original equipment manufacturing profitability. In contrast, a product‐as‐a‐service model (S3) achieves superior outcomes by internalising life cycle responsibility and aligning incentives with longevity and service quality, reflecting systemic reconfiguration of value logics. The study contributes theoretically by operationalising an integrated framework that bridges environmental metrics with strategic value dimensions to evaluate circular business models. Practically, it provides firms a structured tool for evaluating trade‐offs and advancing scalable pathways towards a sustainable circular economy.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This study develops and applies an integrated framework combining life cycle assessment, eco-cost monetisation of externalities, and a value alignment score to evaluate circular business model scenarios for smartphones. Using Fairphone 5 as a case, it finds all circular scenarios outperform the linear baseline environmentally and in monetised externalities, but a product-as-a-service model achieves the strongest strategic alignment while incremental repair/long-life models face value proposition and OEM profitability constraints.

Key findings

  • All circular scenarios outperform the linear baseline S0. Relative to S0, GHG emissions fall by 32% in S1, 46% in S2, and 48% in S3. Total eco-costs are €66.17 for S0, €45.49 for S1 (−31%), €41.42 for S2 (−36%), and €41.01 for S3 (−38%) in the text; Table 5 lists totals of €45.59, €42.26, and €41.01 for S1–S3.
  • Value alignment scores are S0 = 6.75, S1 = 11.50, S2 = 11.15, and S3 = 17.10. S2 scores slightly below S1 because longer lifespan weakens value capture and value proposition, while S3’s PaaS model achieves the highest score by internalising life cycle responsibility and aligning OEM incentives with longevity and service quality.
  • Material mass and monetised burden diverge sharply: aluminium is ~37 wt% but only ~1.9% of material-related eco-costs, whereas gold is ~0.03 wt% but accounts for 45.6% of material-related eco-costs.
  • S3’s eco-cost advantage over S2 is marginal (€1.25) despite two extra years of service life, because S3’s comprehensive refurbishment—cosmetic replacements, repairs, and upgrades—adds resource intensity that partly offsets use-phase gains.

Methods

  • Single-case study of Fairphone 5 with cradle-to-grave LCA following ISO 14040/14044. Functional unit is 3 years of smartphone use. Primary data come from Fairphone’s ERP and bill of materials (>6700 components), supplemented by ecoinvent v3.10. Four OEM-perspective scenarios: S0 linear 3-year lifespan, no repairs; S1 5-year lifespan with user-led DIY repairs; S2 7-year lifespan with intensified user-led DIY repairs including battery replacement; S3 9-year PaaS leasing with manufacturer-led refurbishment and modular upgrades.
  • Layer 2 monetises LCA midpoint impacts using the eco-cost method and prevention-cost logic, producing an Eco Cost Index (ECI). Standard Eco-Cost V3.0 factors are used where applicable; custom factors are derived for fossil resource depletion and mineral/metal depletion. Indicator weights are set to 1.
  • Layer 3 uses a semi-qualitative Value Alignment Score (VAS) based on 20 sector-specific indicators across value creation, delivery, proposition, and capture. An expert panel scored each scenario on a 0–5 Likert scale; dimension weights are set equally to 1. Results are synthesised in an eco-cost versus VAS matrix.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the single Fairphone 5 case, intentionally selected for its designed-for-circularity attributes, limits generalisability to products with different design constraints, market positions, customer segments, or regulatory environments. The eco-cost method covers only environmental externalities and excludes social impacts, especially upstream raw material extraction. The VAS includes subjective judgement despite literature-derived indicators and expert review, and alternative weighting schemes could change rankings. A detailed OEM financial analysis was deliberately excluded.
  • The text also makes evident that the consumer perspective is excluded from the scenario analysis, the device’s material composition has approximately 1 wt% unspecified mass, and custom eco-cost factors rely on assumptions about ore grades, processing intensities, and substitution potentials. Equal weighting of VAS dimensions is a baseline choice that may not reflect stakeholder-specific priorities.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bse.70271

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

49 of 96 cited sources checked · 9 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Nine impact categories emerge as more critical for the environmental profile of smartphones.

    “Although the study covers a comprehensive set of 16 environmental impact indicators, nine impact categories emerge as more critical owing to their relevance to the environmental profile of smartphones (Clément et al. 2020;Sánchez et al. 2024).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Clément et al. 2020 source

      The Introduction (p. 3) explicitly limits this study to global warming potential over 100 years (GWP100). Its analysis does not assess 16 indicators or identify nine critical impact categories for smartphones. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Sánchez et al. 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Premisecitation

    LCA's integration into business model innovation is limited, especially in the fast-paced smartphone sector.

    “Despite LCA's robustness in revealing environmental hotspots, its integration into business model innovation (BMI) is limited, especially in the fast-paced smartphone sector where innovation cycles and profit motives impede the adoption and implementation of circular strategies (Rittershaus et al. 2025).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rittershaus et al. 2025 source

      The section “Strategic Adaptations in Value Creation” identifies shorter innovation cycles and uncertainty about profitability as barriers to circular practices in the mobile-phone industry. However, neither that section nor the passages retrieved for “LCA” and “life cycle assessment” say that LCA’s integration into business model innovation is limited or discuss its ability to reveal environmental hotspots. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Conventional LCA is not well suited to assess business models, as it neglects economic and socio-technical factors such as monetary flows and value-chain dynamics.

    “Most critically, for business strategy, conventional LCA is not well suited to assess business models, as it neglects economic and socio-technical factors, such as monetary flows and value-chain dynamics, essential to corporate strategy (Goffetti et al. 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Goffetti et al. 2022 source
  • Premisecitation

    Interconnected barriers spanning financial, market, operational, organisational, policy, technological and intrinsic domains pose substantial systemic inertia, impeding CE implementation.

    “However, interconnected barriers spanning financial, market, operational, organisational, policy, technological and intrinsic domains pose substantial systemic inertia, impeding CE implementation (Tura et al. 2019;Vermunt et al. 2019;Rizos and Bryhn 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Tura et al. 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Vermunt et al. 2019 source

      Section 2.2 (page not supplied) identifies financial, organisational, knowledge-and-technology, supply-chain, market and institutional barriers to implementing circular business models; institutional barriers include regulations. The Discussion and conclusions (page not supplied) finds many barriers interlinked. The paper does not identify an intrinsic barrier domain or explicitly establish the broader claim of systemic inertia across CE implementation. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Rizos and Bryhn 2022 source

      Section 2 identifies multiple financial, supply-chain, technological, consumer, organisational and policy barriers, and section 6 says no single policy instrument can address them all. Section 4.6 also describes an internal focus on linear processes that cannot easily change. The paper does not identify the quoted seven-domain classification, particularly a separate “intrinsic” domain, and its findings focus on the EEE sector rather than CE implementation generally. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    In smartphones, upstream processes, particularly extraction of raw materials and energy-intensive manufacturing of components, dominate the overall product footprint.

    “In the case of smartphones, numerous studies identify upstream processes, particularly the extraction of raw materials and the energyintensive manufacturing of components, to dominate the overall product footprint (Clément et al. 2020;Cordella et al. 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Clément et al. 2020 source

      Section 3.1.1 (p. 9) reports that production accounts for 70 ± 12% of smartphones’ greenhouse-gas footprint. Sections 3.2.1 (p. 13) and 5 (p. 25) identify component manufacturing, particularly integrated circuits, as an important contributor with substantial electricity use. The paper does not establish that raw-material extraction itself dominates, and its findings concern greenhouse-gas impact rather than every measure of product footprint. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Cordella et al. 2021 source
  • May combine two claims. 62
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 40
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A circular economy requires LCA to analyse environmental trade-offs across the entire product life cycle, linking to value creation and capture dynamics to enable strategic decision-making.

    “Although these methods suit a productfocused linear economy, a circular economy (CE) requires LCA to analyse environmental trade-offs across the entire product life cycle, linking to value creation and capture dynamics to enable strategic decision-making (Goffetti et al. 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Goffetti et al. 2022 source

      Sections 5.1 and 5.2 distinguish product-centred conventional LCA from BM-LCA, which connects physical life-cycle flows with business costs, revenues and profitability. Section 6 says that this connection helps companies evaluate environmental performance and strategic options. The paper supports that approach for circular business models, but does not say conventional LCA is suited only to a linear economy or that a circular economy requires LCA generally to link value-creation and value-capture dynamics. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    LCA is effective in systematically accounting for impacts across entire life cycle stages and highlighting environmental hotspots in resource extraction, component manufacturing, assembly, transport, use phase and end-of-life.

    “in systematically accounting for impacts across the entire life cycle stages and highlighting environmental hotspots in resource extraction, component manufacturing, assembly, transport, use phase and EoL (Goffetti et al. 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Goffetti et al. 2022 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Fairphone 5 overcomes common linear product challenges, making it an ideal case for evaluating CBM potential while minimising hypothetical assumptions.

    “As the Fairphone 5 overcomes common linear product challenges, it serves as an ideal case for evaluating CBM potential while minimising hypothetical assumptions that could skew results (Hazelwood and Pecht 2021;Jugend et al. 2024).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hazelwood and Pecht 2021 source

      Section VIII (Consumer Protection; page unavailable) describes the Fairphone as designed for repairability and upgradability, supporting the idea that it addresses some common smartphone-design challenges. It does not identify the Fairphone 5 or say that it is an ideal case for evaluating CBM potential or minimising hypothetical assumptions. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Jugend et al. 2024 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    CE seeks to enhance resource productivity by narrowing, slowing and closing material and energy loops.

    “CE seeks to enhance resource productivity by narrowing (enhancing efficiency), slowing them (extending use) and closing them (reclaiming resources) material and energy loops (Kirchherr et al. 2017;Konietzko et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kirchherr et al. 2017 source

      The paper’s definition in §2.3 (page not provided) describes CE through reducing, reusing, recycling and recovering materials, which broadly corresponds to using fewer resources, extending use and reclaiming resources. It does not state the specific narrowing–slowing–closing framework or describe enhancing resource productivity across both material and energy loops as CE’s aim. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Konietzko et al. 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Life cycle-extending strategies such as repair, refurbishment, leasing or component harvesting can partially offset declining sales by generating after-sales revenues while simultaneously lowering manufacturing expenditures through reduced demand for new units and components.

    “Life cycle-extending strategies such as repair, refurbishment, leasing or component harvesting can partially offset declining sales by generating after-sales revenues while simultaneously lowering manufacturing expenditures through reduced demand for new units and components (Geissdoerfer et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Geissdoerfer et al. 2020 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisereasoning

    There is a need for integrated assessment frameworks combining environmental, economic and potentially social dimensions, supported by robust, standardised metrics.

    “Consequently, there is an urgent need for integrated assessment frameworks combining environmental, economic and potentially social dimensions, supported by robust, standardised metrics (Corona et al. 2019;Centobelli et al. 2020;van Loon et al. 2021;Jerome et al. 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Corona et al. 2019 source
    • cites Centobelli et al. 2020 source
    • cites van Loon et al. 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Established methods like life cycle assessment and true cost accounting can evaluate sustainability performance and provide critical data, but they are rarely incorporated into business model design or evaluation.

    “Established methods like life cycle assessment (LCA) and true cost accounting (TCA) can evaluate sustainability performance and provide critical data, but they are rarely incorporated into business model design or evaluation (de Giacomo and Bleischwitz 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites de Giacomo and Bleischwitz 2020 source

      In the passage labelled ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (page unavailable), the review says some authors used life cycle analysis to evaluate environmental burdens and inform sustainable business-model design. Our copy does not address true cost accounting or establish that either method is rarely incorporated into business-model design or evaluation. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    End-of-life management generally contributes only a relatively small proportion to total life cycle impact compared to the manufacturing stage.

    “Finally, although EoL management is crucial for resource recovery and for mitigating hazardous emissions such as landfill leachate (Forti et al. 2020), it generally contributes only a relatively small proportion to the total life cycle impact compared to the manufacturing stage (He et al. 2020;Bruno et al. 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites He et al. 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Bruno et al. 2022 source

      The available passage on manual dismantling discusses material recovery and labour costs, not life-cycle impacts. Searches for end-of-life impacts relative to manufacturing found no passage in our copy that makes that comparison. (LLM, conf=0.74)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Standard conversion factors from the Eco-Cost V3.0 database were directly applicable for most EF 3.1 impact categories, but depletion indicators for fossil resources and minerals and metals required custom factor derivation owing to the lack of universally accepted unit costs.

    “While standard conversion factors from the Eco-Cost V3.0 database (Vogtländer et al. 2019) were directly applicable for most EF 3.1 impact categories, depletion indicators for fossil resources and for minerals and metals required custom factor derivation owing to the lack of universally accepted unit costs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Vogtländer et al. 2019 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    Scoring was guided by a structured rubric derived from sector-specific CE literature and scenario attributes and was further subjected to expert review.

    “To mitigate this, scoring was guided by a structured rubric derived from sector-specific CE literature and scenario attributes (Rittershaus et al. 2025) and was further subjected to expert review.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rittershaus et al. 2025 source

      The Methodology section describes a coding framework for mobile-phone circular-economy barriers and enablers, with categories drawn from the literature. It does not describe a scoring rubric derived from scenario attributes. The citation is attached to the rubric’s basis, not to the subsequent expert review, so expert review is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Although extending the product life cycle promotes sufficiency, it can simultaneously erode the perceived consumer value proposition if products are perceived as outdated.

    “Although extending the PLC promotes sufficiency, it can simultaneously erode the perceived consumer value proposition if products are perceived as outdated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Magnier and Mugge 2022 source
    • cites van den Berge et al. 2023 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The circular economy transition requires offerings that resonate with evolving consumer needs and challenge entrenched consumption patterns.

    “It requires offerings that resonate with evolving consumer needs and challenge entrenched consumption patterns (Boyer et al. 2021).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Boyer et al. 2021 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Service-oriented offerings transform value propositions from static ownership to dynamic access, guaranteeing performance and evolving functionality.

    “Service-oriented offerings transform value propositions from static ownership to dynamic access, guaranteeing performance and evolving functionality (Poppelaars et al. 2018;Centobelli et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Poppelaars et al. 2018 source

      Section 2 describes a shift from a one-time transfer of ownership to an ongoing access relationship. The paper also recommends a dynamically adapted value proposition, including software updates, and constant access to a technically similar smartphone. These are recommendations, not a guarantee of performance or evolving functionality. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Centobelli et al. 2020 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Common barriers to circular business models include consumers' reluctance to use technologically dated products and original equipment manufacturers' uncertainty about revenue and profit in increasingly dematerialised value chains.

    “Common barriers include consumers' reluctance to use technologically dated products and OEMs' uncertainty about revenue and profit in increasingly dematerialised value chains (Tunn et al. 2020;van der Velden et al. 2023).”
    • Also stated in: § 5 | Discussion: Implication for CBMs · plain
      “This occurs because consumers resist outdated devices and OEMs face revenue uncertainty in dematerialised value chains (Tunn et al. 2020;Graessler and Pottebaum 2021;van der Velden et al. 2023).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Tunn et al. 2020 source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) says many consumers are unenthusiastic about access-based product-service systems and still value ownership. It does not link that reluctance to technologically dated products. The passages found on digitalisation and business models do not address OEMs’ uncertainty about revenue or profit in dematerialised value chains. (LLM, conf=0.79)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites van der Velden et al. 2023 source

      The Regulating Repair section (page unavailable) identifies consumer attitudes and preferences as barriers to repair-based business models. It does not say consumers are reluctant to use technologically dated products, and the passages on business models and conclusions do not describe OEM uncertainty about revenue or profit in dematerialised value chains. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Graessler and Pottebaum 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Efficiently managed take-back and refurbishment systems within a product-service system can turn extended producer responsibility obligations into value recovery opportunities, whereas high-quality, accessible service offerings can build brand loyalty in line with right-to-repair mandates, rather than treating them merely as compliance burdens.

    “For instance, efficiently managed take-back and refurbishment systems within a PSS can turn EPR obligations into value recovery opportunities, whereas high-quality, accessible service offerings can build brand loyalty in line with RtR mandates, rather than treating them merely as compliance burdens (Rizos and Bryhn 2022).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rizos and Bryhn 2022 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Single-dimensional assessments obscure trade-offs, whereas multilayered frameworks reveal both tensions and synergies.

    “Singledimensional assessments obscure trade-offs, whereas multilayered frameworks reveal both tensions and synergies (de Giacomo and Bleischwitz 2020; Goffetti et al. 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites de Giacomo and Bleischwitz 2020 source

      Section 3.2.4 discusses the need to consider financial alongside environmental and social performance, and Section 4.4 identifies tensions between social value creation and private value capture. The paper does not establish that single-dimensional assessments obscure trade-offs or that multilayered frameworks reveal both tensions and synergies; it presents further study of these relationships as a research avenue. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Goffetti et al. 2022 source

      Section 5.3 says business-model canvas tools can miss interconnections, while BM-LCA measures them; Section 6 says conventional LCA covers fewer business-model elements than BM-LCA. The paper also examines environmental performance alongside profitability, supporting the idea that a broader assessment can expose tensions and potential win-win outcomes. It does not establish the claim for single-dimensional assessments and multilayered frameworks in general. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Reverse logistics systems, by providing convenient and incentivised take-back options, encourage widespread consumer participation, facilitate multistakeholder collaboration, and enable the return of value to the original equipment manufacturer, thereby catalysing a resilient service ecosystem.

    “Such systems, by providing convenient and incentivised take-back options, not only encourage widespread consumer participation (Cordova-Pizarro et al. 2020;Ylä-Mella et al. 2022) but also facilitate multistakeholder collaboration and enable the return of value to the OEM, thereby catalysing a resilient service ecosystem.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Cordova-Pizarro et al. 2020 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Ylä-Mella et al. 2022 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Scenario S1 has an eco-cost of €45.49, a reduction of 31% relative to S0.

    “The circular scenarios offer substantial reductions, with S1 at €45.49 (-31%), S2 at €41.42 (-36%) and S3 achieving the lowest total eco-cost at €41.01 (-38%).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    S2 and S3 achieve the lowest total impacts, with particularly pronounced reductions in freshwater ecotoxicity, fossil resource use and water use.

    “Both scenarios achieve the lowest total impacts, with particularly pronounced reductions in 'freshwater ecotoxicity', 'fossil resource use' and 'water use'.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Although S3 achieves the lowest overall eco-cost, its €1.25 advantage over S2 is marginal despite two extra years of service life.

    “Although S3 achieves the lowest overall eco-cost, its €1.25 advantage over S2 is marginal despite two extra years of service life.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    S3 excels in value delivery and enhances the value proposition.

    “S3 excels in value delivery and enhances the value proposition (e.g., maintaining technological relevance and novelty through periodic upgrades and comprehensive service offerings).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Scenario S3 has a VAS of 17.10, the highest score, reflecting systemic reconfiguration as a product-as-a-service model.

    “By contrast, scenario S3 (VAS: 17.10) achieves the highest score, reflecting systemic reconfiguration as a PaaS model.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Scenario S0 has a VAS of 6.75 and exhibits the weakest circular economy alignment.

    “Scenario S0 (VAS: 6.75) exhibits the weakest CE alignment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Scenario S1 has a VAS of 11.50, with increases across all four value dimensions.

    “Introducing DIY repairs and extending product lifespan in scenario S1 (VAS to 11.50), with increases across all four value dimensions, highlighting the initial strategic value in enabling PLE.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Scenario S2 has a total eco-cost of €42.26, making it the second most favourable scenario from a purely monetised externalities perspective.

    “Scenario S2 offers a further reduction in environmental burden (€42.26),making it the second most favourable scenario from a purely monetised externalities perspective.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Scenario S3 achieves the lowest total eco-cost at €41.01, a reduction of 38% relative to S0.

    “The circular scenarios offer substantial reductions, with S1 at €45.49 (-31%), S2 at €41.42 (-36%) and S3 achieving the lowest total eco-cost at €41.01 (-38%).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Scenario S1 demonstrates a significant improvement in both parameters compared to S0, reducing eco-costs by approximately 31% while increasing VAS by 70%.

    “Scenario S1 demonstrates a significant improvement in both parameters compared to S0, reducing eco-costs by approximately 31% while increasing VAS by 70%.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The baseline scenario S0 represents the least desirable option, incurring the highest environmental burden (€66.17) while exhibiting the lowest VAS (6.75).

    “The baseline scenario, S0, evidently represents the least desirable option, incurring the highest environmental burden (€66.17) while exhibiting the lowest VAS (6.75).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    S2 and S3 reduce impacts for acidification and particulate matter by over 50% and for ozone depletion by more than 60%.

    “Furthermore, they demonstrate substantial improvements in other key impact categories, reducing impacts for 'acidification' and 'particulate matter' by over 50% and for 'ozone depletion' by an even greater margin of 60%.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Scenario S2 has an eco-cost of €41.42, a reduction of 36% relative to S0.

    “The circular scenarios offer substantial reductions, with S1 at €45.49 (-31%), S2 at €41.42 (-36%) and S3 achieving the lowest total eco-cost at €41.01 (-38%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For climate change, scenario S0 exhibits the highest greenhouse gas emissions, whereas S1-S3 achieve progressively lower burdens.

    “For the impact category climate change, scenario S0 exhibits the highest greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), whereas S1-S3 achieve progressively lower burdens.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    All circular approaches outperform the linear baseline in terms of environmental burdens and monetised externalities.

    “The comparative integrated assessment confirms that all circular approaches outperform the linear baseline in terms of environmental burdens and monetised externalities.”
    • Also stated in: § 5 | Discussion: Implication for CBMs · boosted
      “The comparative integrated assessment of four distinct smartphone CBM scenarios confirmed clear advantages of all circular approaches over the linear baseline.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Ownership-retaining service models, such as the product-service system, outperform other circular business model models by simultaneously reducing externalised environmental costs and achieving higher alignment with circular value logics.

    “The results show that ownership-retaining service models, such as the PSS, outperform other CBM models by simultaneously reducing externalised environmental costs and achieving higher alignment with circular value logics.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Refurbishment-based models also show meaningful improvements over business-as-usual, though their contribution to systemic circularity remains more limited.

    “Refurbishment-based models also show meaningful improvements over business-asusual, though their contribution to systemic circularity remains more limited.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Although S3 incorporates interventions like refurbishment and upgrades, which might be considered lower R-strategies than repair and reuse in S1 and S2, it still outperforms both ecologically and strategically.

    “Although S3 incorporates interventions like refurbishment and upgrades, which, judging by a purely hierarchical perspective, might be considered lower R-strategies than repair and reuse in S1 and S2, it still outperforms both ecologically and strategically.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The LCA was conducted in accordance with ISO 14040 and 14044 standards.

    “an LCA was conducted in accordance with ISO 14040 and 14044 standards.”
    • Also stated in: § 3.2 | Framework in Detail 3.3 | LCA · plain
      “an LCA was conducted in accordance with ISO 14040 and 14044 standards (ISO 2006a(ISO , 2006b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The Fairphone 5 case provides a benchmark for what is possible under optimal conditions.

    “This case thus provides a benchmark for what is possible under optimal conditions, enabling focused analysis of CBMs without the confounding effects of product design limitations or hypothetical assumptions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    TCA translates environmental and social externalities into monetary terms, revealing hidden costs of production and consumption systems.

    “TCA offers a complementary perspective by translating environmental and social externalities into monetary terms, thereby revealing the hidden costs of production and consumption systems (Michalke et al. 2025).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Michalke et al. 2025 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    TCA, by monetising hidden environmental and social costs, makes externalities visible but remains disconnected from firm-level value creation and capture logics.

    “TCA, by monetising hidden environmental and social costs, makes externalities visible but similarly remains disconnected from firmlevel value creation and capture logics (Michalke et al. 2025).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Michalke et al. 2025 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    CBMI serves as a critical strategic lever for transformation, reconfiguring value creation, delivery and capture to align with CE principles.

    “CBMI serves as a critical strategic lever for this transformation, reconfiguring value creation, delivery and capture to align with CE principles (Geissdoerfer et al. 2023).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Geissdoerfer et al. 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Innovation frameworks frequently assume environmental benefits based on circularity principles yet rarely subject these assumptions to quantitative validation through methods such as LCA or TCA.

    “On one hand, innovation frameworks frequently assume environmental benefits based on circularity principles yet rarely subject these assumptions to quantitative validation through methods such as LCA or TCA.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning

    The Fairphone 5 embeds circular principles throughout its life cycle.

    “We intentionally selected the Fairphone 5 as an exemplary case because it embeds circular principles throughout its life cycle.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Practical application of comprehensive frameworks like LCSA for guiding BMI faces hurdles including exceptional complexity, data intensity and disaggregated results difficult for managers to transfer into strategic decisions.

    “However, the practical application of such comprehensive frameworks for guiding BMI faces its own hurdles, including exceptional complexity, data intensity and disaggregated results that are difficult for managers to transfer into strategic decisions (Elias Mota et al. 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Elias Mota et al. 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Research on circular business models remains fragmented, with CBMI and implementation often treated as distinct and isolated domains, and a significant research gap manifests.

    “Despite these advances on CBMs, research remains fragmented, with CBMI and implementation often being treated as distinct and isolated domains, and a significant research gap with two critical characteristics manifests.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Research on supply chain contributions tends to emphasise infrastructural coordination, often in isolation from broader questions of both strategic and ecological viability.

    “Meanwhile, research on supply chain contributions tends to emphasise infrastructural coordination, often in isolation from broader questions of both strategic and ecological viability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The eco-cost methodology is grounded in the principle of prevention costs, expressing environmental burdens as marginal costs of mitigating emissions and resource depletion to levels within Earth's ecological carrying capacity.

    “The eco-cost methodology is grounded in the principle of prevention costs, whereby environmental burdens are expressed as marginal costs of mitigating emissions and resource depletion to levels that remain within the Earth's ecological carrying capacity (Vogtländer 2025).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Vogtländer 2025

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The Fairphone 5 is designed for long life and easy repair.

    “Crucially, the device is designed for a long life and easy repair, and the company provides the complete underlying infrastructure, including spare parts, manuals and repair services.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Adoption-focused studies highlight contextual enablers of CBMs but offer limited analytical tools for evaluating trade-offs across economic, environmental and social value dimensions.

    “On the other hand, adoption-focused studies highlight contextual enablers of CBMs but offer limited analytical tools for evaluating the trade-offs that arise across economic, environmental and social value dimensions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    S1 highlights the strategic potential of enabling product lifetime extension while also revealing the limits of such interventions in reshaping the value proposition.

    “Overall, S1 highlights the strategic potential of enabling PLE while also revealing the limits of such interventions in reshaping the value proposition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Although S2 is environmentally more efficient per functional unit over its extended product life cycle, its strategic alignment and perceived circular business model viability show a marginal decline relative to S1.

    “Although S2 is environmentally more efficient per FU over its extended PLC, its strategic alignment and perceived CBM viability show a marginal decline.”
    • Also stated in: § 5 | Discussion: Implication for CBMs · plain
      “Scenario S2 exemplifies this-although environmentally more efficient per FU, its strategic alignment declines relative to S1.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Transportation distances, repair frequencies and device failure rates were obtained from Fairphone's ERP system and are thus highly reliable, but these operational parameters may not be fully generalisable beyond the case context.

    “Similarly, although transportation distances, repair frequencies and device failure rates were obtained from Fairphone's ERP system and are thus highly reliable, these operational parameters may not be fully generalisable beyond the case context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    An Excel-based scoring sheet was circulated among domain experts, who provided independent ratings and feedback, which were subsequently integrated to refine the scoring rubric.

    “An Excel-based scoring sheet was circulated among domain experts, who provided independent ratings and feedback, which were subsequently integrated to refine the scoring rubric.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Any underestimated eco-cost would affect linear scenarios more heavily, thereby strengthening the findings that favour circular business models.

    “Consequently, any underestimated eco-cost would affect linear scenarios more heavily, thereby strengthening the findings that favour CBMs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The expert review step improved consistency and reduced evaluator bias.

    “This step improved consistency and reduced evaluator bias, though more formal inter-rater reliability testing could strengthen future applications.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The final VAS scoring still involves a degree of expert judgement.

    “Although this validation process adds rigour, it is important to acknowledge that the final scoring still involves a degree of expert judgement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Assumptions regarding average ore grades, processing intensities and substitution potentials may affect the precision of absolute eco-cost values.

    “Here, assumptions regarding average ore grades, processing intensities and substitution potentials may affect the precision of absolute values.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Despite its strong performance, the practical viability of the product-as-a-service model (S3) is constrained by several real-world challenges.

    “Despite its strong performance, the practical viability of the PaaS model ( S3) is constrained by several real-world challenges.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Each scenario was evaluated against every indicator by an expert panel using a 0-5 Likert scale, with scores substantiated by scenario-specific attributes.

    “Each scenario was evaluated against every indicator by an expert panel, using a 0-5 Likert scale (0 = no alignment; 5 = optimal alignment), with scores substantiated by scenario-specific attributes (e.g., design for longevity an repair infrastructure).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The assignment of scores on the 0-5 scale involves qualitative judgement and thus carries an element of subjectivity.

    “Firstly, the assignment of scores on a 0-5 scale involves qualitative judgement and thus carries an element of subjectivity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Application to other industries would require sector-specific adaptation of indicators and potential recalibration of weighting schemes.

    “Application to other industries would, however, requires sector-specific adaptation of indicators and potential recalibration of weighting schemes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The longer 7-year span undermines economic viability assurance for the OEM and reduces technological relevance and competitiveness for consumers.

    “Specifically, the longer span of 7 years undermines 'economic viability assurance' for the OEM and reduces 'technological relevance and competitiveness' for consumers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The LCA findings do not capture environmental externalities or strategic alignment within a broader circular economy framework.

    “Although the LCA findings provide critical insights into the relative performance of the assessed CBMs, they do not capture environmental externalities or strategic alignment within a broader CE framework.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    For service-centric models to drive circular economy adoption, their value proposition must extend beyond functional benefits and convenience.

    “However, for such service-centric models to drive CE adoption, their value proposition must extend beyond functional benefits and convenience.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    By internalising life cycle responsibility, service-based models realign original equipment manufacturer incentives with product longevity and performance, enabling new forms of value capture and evolving value propositions to consumers.

    “By internalising life cycle responsibility, these models realign OEM incentives with product longevity and performance, enabling new forms of value capture and evolving value propositions to consumers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Service-centric models must also address the deeply ingrained consumer preference for novelty and navigate the psychological aspects of access versus ownership.

    “It must also address the deeply ingrained consumer preference for novelty and navigate the psychological aspects of 'access versus ownership'.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Systematising value delivery is critical for the scalability, resilience and ultimate success of circular economy operations within the smartphone industry.

    “Systematising value delivery is critical for the scalability, resilience and ultimate success of CE operations within the smartphone industry.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Environmental optimisation alone is insufficient, and firms must align business model logics with consumer value and long-term viability.

    “Strategically, these findings demonstrate that environmental optimisation alone is insufficient, and firms must align business model logics with consumer value and long-term viability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hobson 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Corvellec et al. 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Extending lifespans through slowing strategies yields clear environmental benefits, but these benefits plateau when pursued without systemic circular business model innovation.

    “The comparative assessment reveals that extending lifespans through slowing strategies yields clear environmental benefits (Wieser and Tröger 2018;Bocken 2021), but these benefits plateau when pursued without systemic CBMI.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Wieser and Tröger 2018 source
    • cites Bocken 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    Truly impactful circular business models embed circular principles directly into the product architecture and the underlying business model logic itself.

    “Although these features are foundational, truly impactful CBMs embed circular principles directly into the product architecture and the underlying business model logic itself (Geissdoerfer et al. 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Geissdoerfer et al. 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Incremental extensions of lifespan (S1, S2) improve environmental performance but may weaken business viability and consumer value if pursued in isolation.

    “Incremental extensions of lifespan (S1, S2) improve environmental performance but may weaken business viability and consumer value if pursued in isolation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Innovating the value proposition for a circular economy involves not just new service layers or product features but also transparently demonstrating compelling economic and experiential value that can successfully compete with, and ultimately reshape, the prevailing linear consumption paradigm.

    “Therefore, innovating the value proposition for a CE involves not just new service layers or product features but also transparently demonstrating compelling economic and experiential value that can successfully compete with, and ultimately reshape, the prevailing linear consumption paradigm (Centobelli et al. 2020;Geissdoerfer et al. 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Centobelli et al. 2020 source
    • cites Geissdoerfer et al. 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Success of circular economy transitions depends on addressing the critical infrastructural, market and supply chain challenges that shape practical implementation.

    “At the same time, success depends on addressing the critical infrastructural, market and supply chain challenges that shape practical implementation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Systemic business model innovation (S3) enables both better environmental outcomes and stronger alignment across value dimensions.

    “In contrast, systemic BMI (S3) enables both better environmental outcomes and stronger alignment across value dimensions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Advancing circular economy transitions requires integrating environmental efficiency with economically and socially sustainable value architectures.

    “The results thus highlight that advancing CE transitions requires integrating environmental efficiency with economically and socially sustainable value architectures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Alternative weighting schemes reflecting varied stakeholder perspectives or alternative product typologies could potentially lead to different scenario rankings.

    “Yet, alternative weighting schemes reflecting varied stakeholder perspectives or alternative product typologies could potentially lead to different scenario rankings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    User-led repair is a valid starting point for circularity but fails to actualise the full environmental and economic potential inherent in a product.

    “As demonstrated in this study, user-led repair is a valid starting point for circularity but fails to actualise the full environmental and economic potential inherent in a product.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The capacity for nuanced, multifaceted evaluation facilitates more informed, resilient and strategically sound circular business model development.

    “This capacity for nuanced, multifaceted evaluation is what facilitates more informed, resilient and strategically sound CBM development.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This partnership is realised through consumer engagement in feedback loops, participation in upgrade programs, responsible use and timely product returns.

    “Although direct repair is professionalised, this partnership is realised through consumer engagement in feedback loops, participation in upgrade programs, responsible use and timely product returns.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The applied eco-cost method focuses exclusively on environmental externalities and does not account for social impacts, particularly those arising in upstream raw material extraction.

    “Secondly, the applied eco-cost method focuses exclusively on environmental externalities and does not account for social impacts, particularly those arising in upstream raw material extraction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Integrated frameworks are crucial for revealing and managing inherent trade-offs and identifying potent synergistic opportunities.

    “As demonstrated thus far, such integrated frameworks are crucial for revealing and managing inherent trade-offs and identifying potent synergistic opportunities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The study refrained from a detailed internal financial analysis from the original equipment manufacturer perspective as a conscious choice for its scope, prioritising evaluating strategic circular economy alignment, monetised externalities and environmental sustainability.

    “Finally, refraining from a detailed internal financial analysis from the OEM perspective was a conscious choice for this study's scope, which prioritised evaluating the strategic CE alignment, monetised externalities and environmental sustainability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    To mitigate VAS subjectivity, the indicators were derived from a comprehensive literature review and validated through expert feedback, and a hierarchical weighting system was used to reflect their relative strategic importance.

    “To mitigate this, several strategies were employed: the indicators themselves were derived from a comprehensive literature review and validated through expert feedback; furthermore, a hierarchical weighting system was used to reflect their relative strategic importance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The analysis is based on a single product case, intentionally selected for its designed-for-circularity attributes.

    “Firstly, the analysis is based on a single product case, intentionally selected for its 'designed-forcircularity' attributes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    By shifting from selling products to selling performance, access or outcomes, businesses can generate revenue through service fees or upgrade options and by maximising the retained asset value from controlled returns and remarketing of refurbished devices or components.

    “By shifting from selling products to selling performance, access or outcomes, businesses can generate revenue through service fees or upgrade options and by maximising the retained asset value from controlled returns and remarketing of refurbished devices or components (Konietzko et al. 2020;Hobson 2021).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Konietzko et al. 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Hobson 2021

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The specific results and the relative performance of the scenarios may differ significantly for products from companies with different design constraints, market positions, customer segments or regulatory environments.

    “The specific results and the relative performance of the scenarios may differ significantly for products from companies with different design constraints, market positions, customer segments or regulatory environments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Eco-cost analysis highlights the disproportionate environmental burden of trace materials like gold, suggesting a basis for policies that incentivise the reduction of virgin material use, for instance through targeted resource taxes.

    “Eco-cost analysis highlights the disproportionate environmental burden of trace materials like gold, suggesting a basis for policies that incentivise the reduction of virgin material use, for instance, through targeted resource taxes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Adopting integrated approaches to evaluating circular business models is needed.

    “A critical methodological implication of this study is the need for adopting integrated approaches to evaluating CBMs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Incremental extensions of product life (as in S1 and S2) reduce impacts but risk diminishing strategic returns unless supported by business model innovation.

    “Incremental extensions of product life (as in S1 and S2) reduce impacts but risk diminishing strategic returns unless supported by business model innovation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The VAS provides a transparent and systematic scoring rubric but inherently includes a degree of subjectivity.

    “Thirdly, although the VAS provides a transparent and systematic scoring rubric, it inherently includes a degree of subjectivity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The feedback loop allows original equipment manufacturers and service providers to gather data on device condition and usage, which is essential for predicting maintenance needs and scaling service capacity to guarantee continuous value delivery.

    “Simultaneously, it allows OEMs and service providers to gather data on device condition and usage, which is essential for predicting maintenance needs and also for scaling service capacity to guarantee continuous value delivery.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
90 of 90
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Peripheral accessories and supporting digital infrastructure are consistently used across all scenarios and therefore do not affect the comparative outcome.

    “Key exclusions from the system boundary include peripheral accessories (e.g., chargers, screen protectors and cases) and supporting digital infrastructure (e.g., mobile networks).This is justified on the basis that these are assumed to be consistently used across all scenarios, thereby not affecting the comparative outcome.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Eco-cost factors derived from prevention-based abatement costs are more stable than market-based commodity prices and less sensitive to short-term pricing volatility.

    “The latter are derived from prevention-based abatement costs, which are deemed to be more stable than market-based commodity prices and therefore less sensitive to short-term pricing volatility.”
2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • S1 eco-cost categories do not sum to the reported total

    Major

    The nine S1 category values in Table 5 sum to €50.22, not the reported €45.59. This changes the size of S1's reported reduction relative to the baseline.

    Reported 45.59 · recomputed 50.22

  • S3 eco-cost categories do not sum to the reported total

    Major

    The nine S3 category values in Table 5 sum to €42.64, rather than €41.01.

    Reported 41.01 · recomputed 42.64

  • S2 eco-cost categories do not sum to the reported total

    Major

    The nine S2 category values in Table 5 sum to €45.00, rather than €42.26.

    Reported 42.26 · recomputed 45

  • Stated S3 advantage does not follow from the adjacent S2 value

    Minor

    The prose gives S2 and S3 eco-costs of €41.42 and €41.01, a difference of €0.41, not €1.25. The €1.25 difference instead matches Table 5's separate S2 value of €42.26.

    Reported 1.25 · recomputed 0.41

  • Two different S2 eco-cost totals are reported

    Minor

    The eco-cost results give S2 a total of €41.42, whereas the synthesis gives €42.26, matching Table 5. The difference also affects the stated comparison with S3.

  • Two different S1 eco-cost totals are reported

    Minor

    The results prose gives S1 an eco-cost of €45.49, while Table 5 reports €45.59.

6 of 6

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rizos V., 2019, Identifying the Impact of the Circular Economy on the Fast‐Moving Consumer Goods Industry. Opportunities and Challenges for Business, Workers and Consumers: Mobile Phones as an Example

Authors
Rittershaus, P., Aryan, V., Sánchez, D., Renner, M., & Poeppelbuss, J.
Affiliations
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Environmental, Safety and Energy Technology UMSICHT (DE)
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Reliability and Microintegration (DE)
  • Chair for Industrial Sales and Service Engineering Ruhr University Bochum Bochum Germany
Corresponding author
Rittershaus, Philipp
Venue
Business Strategy and the Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-10-15
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
1880-1901
ISSN
  • 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0836
OpenAlex
W4415218786
Cited by
3
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Business Strategy and the Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
circular business models, smartphones, value alignment, product-as-a-service, product durability, electronic waste, greenhouse gas emissions, circular economy, value logic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-18.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-18.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review