Cited by 215

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Treatment of woolen textile wastewater using membrane bioreactor, nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for reuse in production processes

Cinperi, Nazlı Caglar, Ozturk, Emrah, Yigit, Nevzat Ozgu, Kitis, Mehmet·2019·Journal of Cleaner Production

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.166

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Advincula, 2001, Molecularly ordered low molecular weight azobenzene dyes and polycation alternate multilayer films: Aggregation, layer order, and photoalignment, Chem. Mater., 13, 2870, 10.1021/cm0101172 · DOI
  2. Alcaina-Miranda, 2009, Nanofiltration as a final step towards textile wastewater reclamation, Desalination, 240, 290, 10.1016/j.desal.2008.02.028 · DOI
  3. Aljerf, 2018, High-efficiency extraction of bromocresol purple dye and heavy metals as chromium from industrial effluent by adsorption onto a modified surface of zeolite: kinetics and equilibrium study, J. Environ. Manag., 225, 120
  4. Aouni, 2009, Treatment of textile wastewater by a hybrid electrocoagulation/nanofiltration process, J. Hazard Mater., 168, 868, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.02.112 · DOI
  5. Awiecka-Skowron, 2011, Effect of dye content in a treated solution on performance of the UF ceramic membrane, Environ. Protect. Eng., 37, 5
  6. Baban, 2004, Biodegradability oriented treatability studies on high strength segregated wastewater of a woolen textile dyeing plant, Chemosphere, 57, 731, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.05.038 · DOI
  7. Badani, 2005, Treatment of textile waste water by membrane bioreactor and reuse, Desalination, 185, 411, 10.1016/j.desal.2005.03.088 · DOI
  8. Barredo-Damas, 2010, Ceramic membrane behavior in textile wastewater ultrafiltration, Desalination, 250, 623, 10.1016/j.desal.2009.09.037 · DOI
  9. Bouhadjar, 2015, Performance of commercial membranes in a side-stream and submerged membrane bioreactor for model textile wastewater treatment, Desalin. Water Treat., 1
  10. Brik, 2006, Advanced treatment of textile wastewater towards reuse using a membrane bioreactor, Process Biochem., 41, 1751, 10.1016/j.procbio.2006.03.019 · DOI
  11. Carrion- Fite, 2017, Development auxiliaries for dyeing polyester with disperse dyes at low temperatures, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 254, 10.1088/1757-899X/254/8/082006 · DOI
  12. Chang, 2004, Treatment of non-biodegradable wastewater by electro-Fenton method, Water Sci. Technol., 49, 213, 10.2166/wst.2004.0266 · DOI
  13. De Jager, 2014, Colour removal from textile wastewater using a pilot-scale dual-stage MBR and subsequent RO system, Separ. Purif. Technol., 135, 135, 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.08.008 · DOI
  14. Dulkadiroglu, 2002, Effect of chemical treatment on soluble residual COD in textile wastewaters, Water Sci. Technol., 45, 251, 10.2166/wst.2002.0433 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Ellouze, 2012, Enhancement of textile wastewater treatment process using nanofiltration, Desalination, 286, 16, 10.1016/j.desal.2011.09.025 · DOI
  16. Hassanzadeh, 2017, An efficient wastewater treatment approach for a real woolen textile industry using a chemical assisted NF membrane process, Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manage., 8, 92
  17. Hoinkis, 2012, Membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology-a promising approach for ındustrial water reuse, Procedia Eng., 33, 234, 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.1199 · DOI
  18. Kappel, 2014, Impacts of NF concentrate recirculation on membrane performance in an integrated MBR and NF membrane process for wastewater treatment, J. Membr. Sci., 453, 359, 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.11.023 · DOI
  19. Kim, 2002, Pilot scale treatment of textile wastewater by combined process (fluidized biofilm process-chemical coagulation-electrochemical oxidation, Water Res., 36, 3979, 10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00113-6 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Kunz, 2001, Combined treatment of textile effluent using the sequence Phanerochaete chrysosporium-ozone, Chemosphere, 44, 281, 10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00165-X · DOI · Paper page
  21. Kurt, 2012, Pilot-scale evaluation of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for process reuse of segregated textile dyewash wastewater, Desalination, 302, 24, 10.1016/j.desal.2012.05.019 · DOI
  22. Ozturk, 2016, Sustainable textile production: cleaner production assessment/eco-efficiency analysis study in a textile mill, J. Clean. Prod., 138, 248, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.071 · DOI
  23. Poole, 2004, Treatment of biorefractory organic compounds in wool scour effluent by hydroxyl radical oxidation, Water Res., 38, 3458, 10.1016/j.watres.2004.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Sert, 2016, Investigation of mini pilot scale MBR-NF and MBR-RO integrated systems performance-preliminary field tests, J. Water Process Eng., 12, 72, 10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.06.008 · DOI
  25. Sert, 2017, Performances of some NF and RO membranes for desalination of MBR treated wastewater, J. Water Process Eng., 16, 193, 10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.11.009 · DOI
  26. Yigit, 2009, Treatment of a denim producting textile industry wastewater using pilot scale membrane bioreactor, Desalination, 240, 143, 10.1016/j.desal.2007.11.071 · DOI
  27. Yukseler, 2017, Analysis of the best available techniques for wastewaters from a denim manufacturing textile mill, J. Environ. Manag., 203, 1118
  28. Yusuff, 2004, Characterization of textile industries’ effluents in Kaduna, Nigeria and pollution implications, Global Nest: Int. J., 6, 212

Metadata

Authors
Cinperi, N. C., Ozturk, E., Yigit, N. O., & Kitis, M.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
223
Pages
837-848
ISSN
0959-6526
Cited by
215
References
0
Language
en
Funders
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review