Cited by 222

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring circular economy imaginaries in European cities: A research agenda for the governance of urban sustainability transitions

Fratini, Chiara Farné, Georg, Susse, Jørgensen, Michael Søgaard·2019·Journal of Cleaner Production

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.193

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Bocken, 2016, Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy, J. Ind. Prod. Eng., 33, 308
  2. Borup, 2006, The sociology of expectations in science and technology, Technol. Anal. Strat. Manag., 18, 285, 10.1080/09537320600777002 · DOI
  3. Cohen, 2016, Sharing cities and sustainable consumption and production: towards an integrated framework, J. Clean. Prod., 134, 87, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.133 · DOI
  4. Cossu, 2015, Urban mining: concepts , terminology , challenges, Waste Manag., 45, 1, 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.09.040 · DOI
  5. Dieleman, 2013, Organisational learning for resilient cities, through realising eco-cultural innovations, J. Clean. Prod., 50, 171, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.027 · DOI
  6. Flyvbjerg, 2006, Five misunderstandings about case-study research, Qual. Inq., 12, 219, 10.1177/1077800405284363 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Frosch, 1989, Strategies for manufacturing, Sci. Am., 261, 144, 10.1038/scientificamerican0989-144 · DOI
  8. Geissdoerfer, 2017, The Circular Economy – a new sustainability paradigm?, J. Clean. Prod., 143, 757, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Georg, 2015, Building sustainable cities: tools for developing new building practices?, Glob. Netw., 15, 325, 10.1111/glob.12081 · DOI
  10. Gutberlet, 2015, Cooperative urban mining in Brazil: collective practices in selective household waste collection and recycling, Waste Manag., 45, 22, 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.06.023 · DOI
  11. Hobson, 2016, Closing the loop or squaring the circle? Locating generative spaces for the circular economy, Prog. Hum. Geogr., 40, 88, 10.1177/0309132514566342 · DOI
  12. Hodson, 2010, Can cities shape sociotechnical transitions and how would we know if they were?, Res. Pol., 39, 477, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.020 · DOI
  13. Jasanoff, 2009, Containing the atom: sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea, Minerva, 47, 119, 10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4 · DOI
  14. Jensen, 2015, Harbour bathing and the urban transition of water in Copenhagen: junctions, mediators, and urban navigations, Environ. Plan., 47, 554, 10.1068/a130132p · DOI
  15. Korhonen, 2018, Circular economy: the concept and its limitations, Ecol. Econ., 143, 37, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Latour, 2004, Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern, Crit. Inq., 30, 225, 10.1086/421123 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Leach, 2010, Governing epidemics in an age of complexity: narratives, politics and pathways to sustainability, Glob. Environ. Chang., 20, 369, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.008 · DOI
  18. Lieder, 2016, Towards circular economy implementation: a comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry, J. Clean. Prod., 115, 36, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Marin, 2018, Interpreting circularity. Circular city representations concealing transition drivers, Sustainability, 10, 10.3390/su10051310 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Meerow, 2016, Defining urban resilience: a review, Landsc. Urban Plann., 147, 38, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011 · DOI
  21. Moreau, 2017, Coming full circle: why social and institutional dimensions matter for the circular economy, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 497, 10.1111/jiec.12598 · DOI
  22. Prendeville, 2018, Circular cities: mapping six cities in transition, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 26, 171, 10.1016/j.eist.2017.03.002 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Stirling, 2016, Knowing doing governing: realising heterodyne democracies. Chapter 12, 259
  24. Tukker, 2015, Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy - a review, J. Clean. Prod., 97, 76, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.049 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Uyarra, 2013, Transforming urban waste into sustainable material and energy usage: the case of Greater Manchester (UK), J. Clean. Prod., 50, 101, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.046 · DOI
  26. Valenzuela, 2017, Against wasted politics: a critique of the circular economy, Ephemera theory Polit. Organ., 17, 23
  27. Vergragt, 2016, Transitions to sustainable consumption and production in cities, J. Clean. Prod., 134, 1, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.050 · DOI
  28. Zink, 2017, Circular economy rebound, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 593, 10.1111/jiec.12545 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Fratini, C. F., Georg, S., & Jørgensen, M. S.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
228
Pages
974-989
ISSN
0959-6526
Cited by
222
References
3
Language
en
Funders
European Regional Development Fund

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring circular economy imaginaries in European cities: A research agenda for the governance of urban sustainability transitions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.193
The paper
Fratini, C. F., Georg, S., & Jørgensen, M. S. (2019). Exploring circular economy imaginaries in European cities: A research agenda for the governance of urban sustainability transitions. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.193