Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 339

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis of recycled solid waste materials in highway pavement: A review

Li, Jin, Xiao, Feipeng, Zhang, Lanfang, Amirkhanian, Serji N.·2019·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

Abstract Highway pavement construction with recycled solid waste materials had become a sustainable topic of great concern recently, due to the potential environmental and economic benefits behind. This review focused on the emerging Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) studies concerning the recycling of solid waste in highway pavement. Firstly, based on the existing studies, the application of most recycled solid waste materials (e.g. recycled asphalt pavement, steel slag and coal fly ash) in highway pavement performed satisfactorily from the environmental and economic perspectives, concretely manifested in the reduction of energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, costs and other indicators. However, several factors, such as lengthened transport distance of recycled waste solid materials and potential leaching of heavy metals, might hinder the recycling. Moreover, it was necessary to pay more attention to pavement use phase, allocation procedure and transport distance of recycled solid waste materials, which had significant impacts on LCA result. In terms of existing LCCAs, the importance of analysis period and discount rate was highlighted and the most practical economic indicator was Net Present Value (NPV). For future study, allocation was still an important issue for future LCA studies and further sensitivity analyses could focus on the selection of transport modes (in LCA), analysis periods and discount rates (in LCCA). Meanwhile, future research should emphasis on the recycling of solid waste in pavement maintenance and rehabilitation projects rather than new construction. A multi-criteria assessment integrated LCA and LCCA as well as other considerations (e.g. an advanced risk assessment) was recommended to determine the most sustainable recycling scenarios.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.061

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 67 references

Cited by

See all 339

Metadata

Authors
Li, J., Xiao, F., Zhang, L., & Amirkhanian, S. N.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
233
Pages
1182-1206
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2950328248
Cited by
339
References
67
FWCI
26.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis of recycled solid waste materials in highway pavement: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.061
The paper
Li, J., Xiao, F., Zhang, L., & Amirkhanian, S. N. (2019). Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis of recycled solid waste materials in highway pavement: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.061

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.