The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis of recycled solid waste materials in highway pavement: A review
Abstract
Abstract Highway pavement construction with recycled solid waste materials had become a sustainable topic of great concern recently, due to the potential environmental and economic benefits behind. This review focused on the emerging Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) studies concerning the recycling of solid waste in highway pavement. Firstly, based on the existing studies, the application of most recycled solid waste materials (e.g. recycled asphalt pavement, steel slag and coal fly ash) in highway pavement performed satisfactorily from the environmental and economic perspectives, concretely manifested in the reduction of energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, costs and other indicators. However, several factors, such as lengthened transport distance of recycled waste solid materials and potential leaching of heavy metals, might hinder the recycling. Moreover, it was necessary to pay more attention to pavement use phase, allocation procedure and transport distance of recycled solid waste materials, which had significant impacts on LCA result. In terms of existing LCCAs, the importance of analysis period and discount rate was highlighted and the most practical economic indicator was Net Present Value (NPV). For future study, allocation was still an important issue for future LCA studies and further sensitivity analyses could focus on the selection of transport modes (in LCA), analysis periods and discount rates (in LCCA). Meanwhile, future research should emphasis on the recycling of solid waste in pavement maintenance and rehabilitation projects rather than new construction. A multi-criteria assessment integrated LCA and LCCA as well as other considerations (e.g. an advanced risk assessment) was recommended to determine the most sustainable recycling scenarios.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A comprehensive review on the applications of coal fly ash
Yao, Z. T., Ji, X. S., Sarker, P. K., Tang, J. H., Ge, L. Q., Xia, M. S., & Xi, Y. Q. (2015) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.11.016 · Cited by 1,737
Habert, G., d’Espinose de Lacaillerie, J. B., & Roussel, N. (2011) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.03.012 · Cited by 1,407
Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA
Ortiz, O., Castells, F., & Sonnemann, G. (2009) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.11.012 · Cited by 1,340
Municipal solid waste management in Indian cities – A review
Sharholy, M., Ahmad, K., Mahmood, G., & Trivedi, R. C. (2008) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.008 · Cited by 1,266
Traci: The Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and Other Environmental Impacts
Bare, J. C. (2002) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1162/108819802766269539 · Cited by 980
Reap, J., Roman, F., Duncan, S., & Bras, B. (2008) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-008-0008-x · Cited by 934
Municipal solid waste management in China: Status, problems and challenges
Zhang, D. Q., Tan, S. K., & Gersberg, R. M. (2010) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.012 · Cited by 916
A review of waste management practices and their impact on human health
Giusti, L. (2009) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.028 · Cited by 880
Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods
Jungbluth, N., Margni, M. D., & Hischier, R. (2010) · Cited by 816
A review of the use of recycled solid waste materials in asphalt pavements
Huang, Y. F., Bird, R. N., & Heidrich, O. (2007) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.02.002 · Cited by 723
Cited by
Circular economy strategies for combating climate change and other environmental issues
Yang, M., Chen, L., Wang, J., Msigwa, G., Osman, A. I., Fawzy, S., Rooney, D. W., & Yap, P.-S. (2023) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-022-01499-6 · Cited by 835
Repurposing waste plastics into cleaner asphalt pavement materials: A critical literature review
Wu, S., & Montalvo, L. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124355 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, J., Xiao, F., Zhang, L., & Amirkhanian, S. N.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 233
- Pages
- 1182-1206
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2950328248
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 26.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis of recycled solid waste materials in highway pavement: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.061
- The paper
- Li, J., Xiao, F., Zhang, L., & Amirkhanian, S. N. (2019). Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis of recycled solid waste materials in highway pavement: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.