The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating the strategies for sustainable energy planning in Pakistan: An integrated SWOT-AHP and Fuzzy-TOPSIS approach
Abstract
Abstract This study proposes an integrated methodology based on Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and Fuzzy Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (F-TOPSIS) to evaluate energy strategies for sustainable energy planning. The SWOT analysis is employed to determine the factors and sub-factors essential for sustainable energy planning. Subsequently, AHP, a Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method is used to determine the weights of each factor and sub-factor. Finally, F-TOPSIS method is used to rank the 13 energy strategies under the case study for Pakistan's to achieve sustainable energy planning. The results of the study reveal that providing low-cost and sustainable electricity to residential, commercial, and industrial sectors (WO5) is highly prioritized energy strategy. While the utilization of coal resources and transformations of same into electricity (WO2) is prioritized as least favored energy strategy. The sensitivity analysis of the results validates the robustness of the study. This study, as such, proposes a systematic approach to develop and evaluate energy strategies for the sustainable energy planning and policy endeavor of Pakistan.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zadeh, L. A. (1965) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90241-x · Cited by 67,855
Zadeh, L. A. (1996) · Cited by 46,844
Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process
Saaty, T. L. (2008) · International Journal of Services Sciences · doi:10.1504/ijssci.2008.017590 · Cited by 10,301
Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making
Hwang, C.-L., & Yoon, K. (1981) · Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3 · Cited by 3,579
Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—A review
Pohekar, S. D., & Ramachandran, M. (2004) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007 · Cited by 1,938
Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process
Forman, E., & Peniwati, K. (1998) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(97)00244-0 · Cited by 1,146
Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making
Kiker, G. A., Bridges, T. S., Varghese, A., Seager, T. P., & Linkov, I. (2005) · Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management · doi:10.1897/ieam_2004a-015.1 · Cited by 914
Kaya, T., & Kahraman, C. (2010) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.051 · Cited by 693
The threat to climate change mitigation posed by the abundance of fossil fuels.
Johnsson, F., Kjärstad, J., & Rootzén, J. (2019) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2018.1483885 · Cited by 543
Ahmad, S., & Tahar, R. M. (2014) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2013.10.001 · Cited by 541
Cited by
Xu, C., Ke, Y., Li, Y., Chu, H., & Wu, Y. (2020) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112892 · Cited by 386
An integrated SWOT-multi-criteria analysis of implementing sustainable waste-to-energy in Pakistan
Longsheng, C., Ali Shah, S. A., Solangi, Y. A., Ahmad, M., & Ali, S. (2022) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.112 · Cited by 57
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Solangi, Y. A., Tan, Q., Mirjat, N. H., & Ali, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 236
- Pages
- 117655
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2957288202
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 30.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating the strategies for sustainable energy planning in Pakistan: An integrated SWOT-AHP and Fuzzy-TOPSIS approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117655
- The paper
- Solangi, Y. A., Tan, Q., Mirjat, N. H., & Ali, S. (2019). Evaluating the strategies for sustainable energy planning in Pakistan: An integrated SWOT-AHP and Fuzzy-TOPSIS approach. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117655
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.