The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bringing an entrepreneurial focus to sustainability education: A teaching framework based on content analysis
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Research on sustainability education has neglected to integrate entrepreneurial skills into other relevant competences such as foresight, complex problem-solving, and interdisciplinarity. Previous research highlights possible convergences between sustainability education and entrepreneurship education; however, it does not address how to achieve this integration in practice. To address the gap between the literature and practice, this paper tackles the question: How can entrepreneurial competences be taught in sustainability education programs in higher education? We introduce a teaching framework based on a bibliometric method that combines topic-modeling with a content-analysis of selected articles. The focus of the analysis is the commonalities of both educational fields. Our results introduce a program for entrepreneurial-oriented sustainability education, providing a description of the educational focus, teaching-learning approaches, main themes, and external collaboration. The framework proposes educational for sustainable development across educational programs while implicitly addressing complex community problems through the development of solutions that can change the ways business and consumers relate with sustainability issues. These results contribute to the sustainability education literature by integrating the development of entrepreneurship competences into interdisciplinary programs. The framework could also be used as a practical guide for designing courses, at both the undergraduate and graduate level, that integrate both sustainability and entrepreneurship.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Content Analysis Guidebook
Neuendorf, K. A. (2017) · doi:10.4135/9781071802878 · Cited by 9,286
Searching for intellectual turning points: progressive knowledge domain visualization
Chen, C. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0307513100 · Cited by 2,791
Dean, T. J., & McMullen, J. S. (2007) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.09.003 · Cited by 1,797
A Competency-Based Perspective on Entrepreneurship Education: Conceptual and Empirical Insights
Morris, M. H., Webb, J. W., Fu, J., & Singhal, S. (2013) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1111/jsbm.12023 · Cited by 670
Nobre, G. C., & Tavares, E. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2281-6 · Cited by 375
Cited by
A Design-Based Learning Approach for Fostering Sustainability Competency in Engineering Education
Huang, Z., Peng, A., Yang, T., Deng, S., & He, Y. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12072958 · Cited by 58
Competence frameworks of sustainable entrepreneurship: A systematic review
Diepolder, C. S., Weitzel, H., & Huwer, J. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su132413734 · Cited by 58
Integrating Sustainability in Engineering: A Global Review
Alhassani, F., Saleem, M., & Messner, J. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17156930 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Hermann, R. R., & Bossle, M. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 246
- Pages
- 119038
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2985399391
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 34.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bringing an entrepreneurial focus to sustainability education: A teaching framework based on content analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119038
- The paper
- Hermann, R. R., & Bossle, M. B. (2020). Bringing an entrepreneurial focus to sustainability education: A teaching framework based on content analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119038
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.