Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A review on contamination and removal of sulfamethoxazole from aqueous solution using cleaner techniques: Present and future perspective

Prasannamedha, G., Kumar, P. Senthil·2020·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

Abstract Sulfamethoxazole is a persistent organic pollutant having N-amine and carboxyl groups rising from pharmaceutical industry. Upon consumption, it undergoes transformation reactions thereby leading to formation of oxidised, acetylated and hydrolysed metabolites in the environment. Though many countries banned use of sulfamethoxazole as growth promoters for veterinary, its occurrence in environment is witnessed even today in rivers, lakes, groundwater, sediments and ocean. This review provides thorough note on occurrence, destiny, toxicity effects and important materials involved in removal technologies like adsorption, Fenton/photo-Fenton process, electrochemical oxidation and photocatalytic degradation. SMX is removed via adsorption by formation of strong chemical interaction with functional moieties present in active sites of sorbents like hydrogen bonding, electrostatic interaction, π-π and hydrophobic interaction whereas AOP’s use external energy, chemical agents for cleaving SMX structure through catalytic degradation by generation of hydroxyl radicals. Removal efficiency of material depends on experimental designs which rely on standard protocol. The article highlights the importance of sustainable development of technology by focussing on its feasibility and cost factor for building economic industrialization and statistics. It urge the significance of synergistic effects involved in nanocomposites/polymer in removing toxic contaminant via adsorption or photocatalytic degradation because of its high stability, functionality, ability to adapt at varying pH, sustainability and decreased cost in life cycle assessment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119553

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 104 references

Metadata

Authors
Prasannamedha, G., & Kumar, P. S.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
250
Pages
119553
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2993706311
Cited by
268
References
104
FWCI
7.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review on contamination and removal of sulfamethoxazole from aqueous solution using cleaner techniques: Present and future perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119553
The paper
Prasannamedha, G., & Kumar, P. S. (2020). A review on contamination and removal of sulfamethoxazole from aqueous solution using cleaner techniques: Present and future perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119553

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.