The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review on contamination and removal of sulfamethoxazole from aqueous solution using cleaner techniques: Present and future perspective
Abstract
Abstract Sulfamethoxazole is a persistent organic pollutant having N-amine and carboxyl groups rising from pharmaceutical industry. Upon consumption, it undergoes transformation reactions thereby leading to formation of oxidised, acetylated and hydrolysed metabolites in the environment. Though many countries banned use of sulfamethoxazole as growth promoters for veterinary, its occurrence in environment is witnessed even today in rivers, lakes, groundwater, sediments and ocean. This review provides thorough note on occurrence, destiny, toxicity effects and important materials involved in removal technologies like adsorption, Fenton/photo-Fenton process, electrochemical oxidation and photocatalytic degradation. SMX is removed via adsorption by formation of strong chemical interaction with functional moieties present in active sites of sorbents like hydrogen bonding, electrostatic interaction, π-π and hydrophobic interaction whereas AOP’s use external energy, chemical agents for cleaving SMX structure through catalytic degradation by generation of hydroxyl radicals. Removal efficiency of material depends on experimental designs which rely on standard protocol. The article highlights the importance of sustainable development of technology by focussing on its feasibility and cost factor for building economic industrialization and statistics. It urge the significance of synergistic effects involved in nanocomposites/polymer in removing toxic contaminant via adsorption or photocatalytic degradation because of its high stability, functionality, ability to adapt at varying pH, sustainability and decreased cost in life cycle assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antibiotics in the aquatic environment – A review – Part I
Kümmerer, K. (2009) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.11.086 · Cited by 4,475
Global increase and geographic convergence in antibiotic consumption between 2000 and 2015
Klein, E. Y., Van Boeckel, T. P., Martinez, E. M., Pant, S., Gandra, S., Levin, S. A., Goossens, H., & Laxminarayan, R. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1717295115 · Cited by 3,232
Patel, M., Kumar, R., Kishor, K., Mlsna, T., Pittman, C. U., & Mohan, D. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00299 · Cited by 2,654
Mohan, D., Sarswat, A., Ok, Y. S., & Pittman, C. U. (2014) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.120 · Cited by 2,313
Application of biochar for the removal of pollutants from aqueous solutions
Tan, X., Liu, Y., Zeng, G., Wang, X., Hu, X., Gu, Y., & Yang, Z. (2015) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.058 · Cited by 2,081
Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in the freshwater aquatic environment
Ebele, A. J., Abou-Elwafa Abdallah, M., & Harrad, S. (2017) · Emerging Contaminants · doi:10.1016/j.emcon.2016.12.004 · Cited by 2,023
Michael, I., Rizzo, L., McArdell, C. S., Manaia, C. M., Merlin, C., Schwartz, T., Dagot, C., & Fatta-Kassinos, D. (2013) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.027 · Cited by 2,013
Ecological effects of antibiotics on natural ecosystems: A review
Grenni, P., Ancona, V., & Barra Caracciolo, A. (2018) · Microchemical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.microc.2017.02.006 · Cited by 1,257
Antibiotic pollution in surface fresh waters: Occurrence and effects
Danner, M.-C., Robertson, A., Behrends, V., & Reiss, J. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.406 · Cited by 1,136
Occurrence and fate of emerging contaminants in water environment: A review
Gogoi, A., Mazumder, P., Tyagi, V. K., Tushara Chaminda, G. G., An, A. K., & Kumar, M. (2018) · Groundwater for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1016/j.gsd.2017.12.009 · Cited by 842
Cited by
Sulfamethoxazole Removal from Drinking Water by Activated Carbon: Kinetics and Diffusion Process
BIZI, M. (2020) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules25204656 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Prasannamedha, G., & Kumar, P. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 250
- Pages
- 119553
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2993706311
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 104
- FWCI
- 7.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review on contamination and removal of sulfamethoxazole from aqueous solution using cleaner techniques: Present and future perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119553
- The paper
- Prasannamedha, G., & Kumar, P. S. (2020). A review on contamination and removal of sulfamethoxazole from aqueous solution using cleaner techniques: Present and future perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119553
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.