The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumers’ response to environmentally-friendly food packaging - A systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Consumers play an important role in the market penetration of environmentally-friendly food packaging because it is they who decide whether or not to buy a particular product. The objective of this paper is to analyse the state of the art regarding consumers’ response to environmentally-friendly food packaging in order to identify existing barriers to purchase and potential measures to overcome these barriers. The paper is based on a systematic synthesis of 46 scientific journal articles on consumer studies related to environmentally-friendly packaging. The literature review applies a conceptual framework regarding the ways consumers respond to product stimuli and the psychological processes involved. Three important barriers to purchasing environmentally-friendly packaging are identified. First, consumers need guidance in recognizing environmentally-friendly packaging; for while consumers primarily consider the packaging material itself and any eco-labels, they also consider other packaging design elements such as colours and pictures of ‘nature’ that can be misleading. Second, it became obvious that consumers lack knowledge, in particular about new packaging materials like bio-based packaging. Third, many of the studies reviewed provide evidence that other product attributes such as price and product quality are more important to consumers than environmentally-friendly packaging. Nevertheless, some studies recorded a significantly higher willingness on the part of consumers to buy and pay for environmentally-friendly packaging and products with reduced packaging compared to products with standard packaging, signalling an overall positive attitude. The literature review revealed many research gaps. For example, it became obvious that consumers’ response to environmentally-friendly food packaging is not yet well understood, in particular with regards to purchasing behaviour (in the real world as opposed to in a survey setting) and measures for overcoming existing barriers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
PRISMA-P Group, Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 · Cited by 26,223
Spence, M. (1973) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1882010 · Cited by 16,171
A safe operating space for humanity
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/461472a · Cited by 13,333
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504620220145401 · Cited by 8,866
New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior
Stern, P. C. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175 · Cited by 8,682
Stigler, G. J. (1961) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/258464 · Cited by 5,155
Stigler, G. J. (1976) · Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-51565-1_86 · Cited by 3,287
The measurement of urban travel demand
McFadden, D. (1974) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/0047-2727(74)90003-6 · Cited by 2,546
Cited by
An overview of biodegradable packaging in food industry
Shaikh, S., Yaqoob, M., & Aggarwal, P. (2021) · Current Research in Food Science · doi:10.1016/j.crfs.2021.07.005 · Cited by 561
Consumer Considerations for the Implementation of Sustainable Packaging: A Review
Boz, Z., Korhonen, V., & Koelsch Sand, C. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12062192 · Cited by 394
Bacterial cellulose as a biodegradable food packaging material: A review
Cazón, P., & Vázquez, M. (2021) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106530 · Cited by 293
Granato, G., Fischer, A. R. H., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132739 · Cited by 66
Consumers’ categorization of eco-friendly consumer goods: An integrative review and research agenda
Larranaga, A., & Valor, C. (2022) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2022.10.005 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Ketelsen, M., Janssen, M., & Hamm, U.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 254
- Pages
- 120123
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3000673326
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 87
- FWCI
- 5.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumers’ response to environmentally-friendly food packaging - A systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120123
- The paper
- Ketelsen, M., Janssen, M., & Hamm, U. (2020). Consumers’ response to environmentally-friendly food packaging - A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120123
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.