The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumer Considerations for the Implementation of Sustainable Packaging: A Review
Open accessAbstract
Packaging sustainability concepts have co-evolved with the increasing incorporation of the principles of sustainable development at various levels within industrial and organizational platforms. Currently, pollution from plastics, packaging-related waste, declining air, soil, and water quality, climate change, and other contemporary challenges are influencing the packaging industry. Barriers such as value chain complexities and negative consumer attitudes due to the economic, social, and environmental demands of sustainable behaviors can discourage companies from the implementation of more sustainable packaging. Hence, packages with improved sustainability may never make their way into the marketplace. However, the next generation of sustainable solutions can be motivated by efforts that fuel a positive consumer attitude towards sustainable packaging. In order to direct efforts, a clear understanding of consumer dynamics in ecological material preferences, willingness to pay, recycling, and factors impacting sustainable behaviors are essential. The objective of this work is to (i) explore the definitions, the impact of sustainable packaging in the value chain, and consumer behavior theories; (ii) review current practices, factors affecting sustainable behaviors, and consumer testing methods; (iii) present three distinct case studies on consumer preferences and value perceptions on bio-based cellulose materials and the impact of on-label claims and pre-evaluation education in consumer preferences; and (iv) to reveal the research gaps and opportunities for consumer research and suggest strategies for stakeholders to communicate packaging sustainability to consumers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean
Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., Narayan, R., & Law, K. L. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1260352 · Cited by 13,163
The Circular Economy–A new sustainability paradigm?
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 · Cited by 9,360
Bem, D. J. (1972) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60024-6 · Cited by 5,241
Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action
Paul, J., Modi, A., & Patel, J. (2016) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.006 · Cited by 2,399
Sustainability labels on food products: consumer motivation, understanding and use
Grunert, K. G., Hieke, S., & Wills, J. (2014) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.12.001 · Cited by 1,334
Kuhlman, T., & Farrington, J. (2010) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su2113436 · Cited by 1,277
Promoting sustainable consumption: Determinants of green purchases by Swiss consumers
Tanner, C., & Wölfing Kast, S. (2003) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.10101 · Cited by 1,127
The theory of planned behaviour: self identity, social identity and group norms.
Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A., & White, K. M. (1999) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466699164149 · Cited by 1,126
The link between green purchasing decisions and measures of environmental consciousness
Schlegelmilch, B. B., Bohlen, G. M., & Diamantopoulos, A. (1996) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090569610118740 · Cited by 1,035
Green marketing: legend, myth, farce or prophesy?
Peattie, K., & Crane, A. (2005) · Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13522750510619733 · Cited by 944
Cited by
Lisboa, H. M., Pasquali, M. B., dos Anjos, A. I., Sarinho, A. M., de Melo, E. D., Andrade, R., Batista, L., Lima, J., Diniz, Y., & Barros, A. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16188223 · Cited by 249
Granato, G., Fischer, A. R. H., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132739 · Cited by 66
Consumers’ categorization of eco-friendly consumer goods: An integrative review and research agenda
Larranaga, A., & Valor, C. (2022) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2022.10.005 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Boz, Z., Korhonen, V., & Koelsch Sand, C.
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-03-12
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2192
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3011128369
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 86
- FWCI
- 41.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumer Considerations for the Implementation of Sustainable Packaging: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/su12062192
- The paper
- Boz, Z., Korhonen, V., & Koelsch Sand, C. (2020). Consumer Considerations for the Implementation of Sustainable Packaging: A Review. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062192
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.