The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Green Human Resource Management for organisational citizenship behaviour towards the environment and environmental performance on a university campus
Abstract
Abstract The slow and inefficient environmental performance of universities is drawing the attention of scholars towards behavioural change in employees rather than just relying on technological upgrades. Drawing upon the Ability-Motivation-Opportunity (AMO) theory, the purpose of this study is first to examine the influence of Green Human Resource Management (HRM) practices (green competence building practices, green motivation enhancing practices, and green employee involvement practices) on the organisational citizenship behaviour towards the environment (OCBE) of academic staff and, in turn, its impact on the environmental performance. Second, the mediating impact of OCBE between each of Green HRM practices and environmental performance is assessed. The data were collected from September until November 2017 on two campuses of a renowned public research university in Malaysia. Using quantitative research design, a structured questionnaire was used among the academic staff of the university. Convenience sampling was used to select the respondents from both campuses, and the Partial Least Squares (PLS) modelling technique was used to analyse the data, which comprised 122 respondents. Overall findings showed that three sets of Green HRM practices based on the Ability-Motivation-Opportunity framework had a significant impact on OCBE. Furthermore, OCBE had a significant relationship with environmental performance. For the mediation analysis, the results showed that OCBE exhibited by academic staff acted as a means through which the Green HRM practices of a university can positively influence the environmental performance of a university campus. The originality of this study rests in shedding light on Green HRM practices in the higher education sector and highlighting the critical role of academic staff’s environmentally friendly behaviour for improving the environmental performance of a university.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 · Cited by 38,459
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879 · Cited by 34,117
When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019) · European Business Review · doi:10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203 · Cited by 27,541
SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03206553 · Cited by 17,383
Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM: A Full Collinearity Assessment Approach
Kock, N. (2015) · International Journal of e-Collaboration · doi:10.4018/ijec.2015100101 · Cited by 10,215
Using pls path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-09-2015-0382 · Cited by 7,173
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018 · Cited by 6,479
Texas A&M International University, Kock, N., Lynn, G., & Stevens Institute of Technology (2012) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00302 · Cited by 3,783
Green Human Resource Management: A Review and Research Agenda*
Renwick, D. W. S., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00328.x · Cited by 2,586
Cited by
Aftab, J., Abid, N., Cucari, N., & Savastano, M. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3219 · Cited by 452
Farrukh, M., Ansari, N., Raza, A., Wu, Y., & Wang, H. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121643 · Cited by 389
Ren, S., Jiang, K., & Tang, G. (2022) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.22079 · Cited by 180
When firms adopt sustainable human resource management: A fuzzy‐set analysis
Jia, J., Yuan, S., Wei, L., & Tang, G. (2023) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.22164 · Cited by 34
Zameer, H., Shahbaz, M., & Kontoleon, A. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118567 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Anwar, N., Nik Mahmood, N. H., Yusliza, M. Y., Ramayah, T., Noor Faezah, J., & Khalid, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 256
- Pages
- 120401
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3005211116
- Cited by
- 612
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 73.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Green Human Resource Management for organisational citizenship behaviour towards the environment and environmental performance on a university campus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120401
- The paper
- Anwar, N., Nik Mahmood, N. H., Yusliza, M. Y., Ramayah, T., Noor Faezah, J., & Khalid, W. (2020). Green Human Resource Management for organisational citizenship behaviour towards the environment and environmental performance on a university campus. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120401
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
