The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Influence of nanofiltration concentrate recirculation on performance and economic feasibility of a pilot-scale membrane bioreactor-nanofiltration hybrid process for textile wastewater treatment with high water recovery
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The use of a plant-based system incorporating membrane bioreactor (MBR) and nanofiltration (NF) technology has promise in reducing the dependence on anaerobic, aerobic, coagulation, and decolorization dosing/sedimentation tanks.
“The use of a plant-based system that incorporates membrane bioreactor (MBR) and NF technology has promise in reducing the dependence on anaerobic, aerobic, coagulation, and decolorization dosing/sedimentation tanks[240].”
From Recent Advances in the Remediation of Textile-Dye-Containing Wastewater: Prioritizing Human Health and Sustainable Wastewater Treatment (2024) · cites this paper as [240]
The introduction and utilization of an MBR-NF treatment facility has resulted in a substantial decrease in operational costs.
“The introduction and utilization of an MBR-NF treatment facility has resulted in a substantial decrease in operational costs.”
From Recent Advances in the Remediation of Textile-Dye-Containing Wastewater: Prioritizing Human Health and Sustainable Wastewater Treatment (2024) · cites this paper as [240]
MBR-NF technology has the benefit of occupying a smaller physical footprint when compared to conventional treatment facilities.
“Moreover, this sophisticated technology has the benefit of occupying a smaller physical footprint when compared to conventional treatment facilities.”
From Recent Advances in the Remediation of Textile-Dye-Containing Wastewater: Prioritizing Human Health and Sustainable Wastewater Treatment (2024) · cites this paper as [240]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- Alcaina-Miranda, 2009, Nanofiltration as a final step towards textile wastewater reclamation, Desalination, 240, 290, 10.1016/j.desal.2008.02.028 · DOI
- Andrade, 2014, Nanofiltration as tertiary treatment for the reuse of dairy wastewater treated by membrane bioreactor, Separ. Purif. Technol., 126, 21, 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.01.056 · DOI
- Chon, 2012, Membrane bioreactor and nanofiltration hybrid system for reclamation of municipal wastewater: removal of nutrients, organic matter and micropollutants, Bioresour. Technol., 122, 181, 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.048 · DOI
- Cinperi, 2019, Treatment of woolen textile wastewater using membrane bioreactor, nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for reuse in production processes, J. Clean. Prod., 223, 837, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.166 · DOI · Paper page
- Dasgupta, 2015, Remediation of textile effluents by membrane based treatment techniques: a state of the art review, J. Environ. Manag., 147, 55
- De Jager, 2012, Membrane bioreactor application within the treatment of high-strength textile effluent, Water Sci. Technol., 65, 907, 10.2166/wst.2012.920 · DOI
- Dubois, 1956, Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances, Anal. Chem., 28, 350, 10.1021/ac60111a017 · DOI · Paper page
- Grilli, 2011, Textile wastewater treatment in a bench-scale anaerobic-biofilm anoxic-aerobic membrane bioreactor combined with nanofiltration, J. Environ. Sci. Health., Part A, 46, 1512, 10.1080/10978526.2011.609078 · DOI
- Gündoğdu, 2019, Effect of concentrate recirculation on the product water quality of integrated MBR – NF process for wastewater reclamation and industrial reuse, J. Water Process Eng., 29, 100485, 10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.08.023 · DOI
- He, 2013, Application of integrated ozone biological aerated filters and membrane filtration in water reuse of textile effluents, Bioresour. Technol., 133, 150, 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.074 · DOI
- Holkar, 2016, A critical review on textile wastewater treatments: possible approaches, J. Environ. Manag., 182, 351
- Jegatheesan, 2016, Treatment of textile wastewater with membrane bioreactor: a critical review, Bioresour. Technol., 204, 202, 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.006 · DOI
- Kappel, 2014, Impacts of NF concentrate recirculation on membrane performance in an integrated MBR and NF membrane process for wastewater treatment, J. Membr. Sci., 453, 359, 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.11.023 · DOI
- Kappel, 2013, Electrochemical phosphate recovery from nanofiltration concentrates, Separ. Purif. Technol., 120, 437, 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.10.022 · DOI
- Li, 2016, Effects of returning NF concentrate on the MBR-NF process treating antibiotic production wastewater, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 23, 13114, 10.1007/s11356-016-6467-x · DOI
- Li, 2015, The color removal and fate of organic pollutants in a pilot-scale MBR-NF combined process treating textile wastewater with high water recovery, Water Sci. Technol., 73, 1426, 10.2166/wst.2015.623 · DOI
- Li, 2016, Advanced treatment of municipal wastewater by nanofiltration: operational optimization and membrane fouling analysis, J. Environ. Sci. (China), 43, 106, 10.1016/j.jes.2015.09.007 · DOI
- Liang, 2014, Treatment of highly concentrated wastewater containing multiple synthetic dyes by a combined process of coagulation/flocculation and nanofiltration, J. Membr. Sci., 469, 306, 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.06.057 · DOI
- Lowry, 1951, Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent, J. Biol. Chem., 193, 265, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6 · DOI
- Lu, 2010, Textile wastewater reuse as an alternative water source for dyeing and finishing processes: a case study, Desalination, 258, 229, 10.1016/j.desal.2010.04.002 · DOI
- Nadeem, 2019, Investigation of segregated wastewater streams reusability with membrane process for textile industry, J. Clean. Prod., 228, 1437, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.205 · DOI
- Neoh, 2016, Green technology in wastewater treatment technologies: integration of membrane bioreactor with various wastewater treatment systems, Chem. Eng. J., 283, 582, 10.1016/j.cej.2015.07.060 · DOI
- Sahinkaya, 2019, Performance of a pilot-scale reverse osmosis process for water recovery from biologically-treated textile wastewater, J. Environ. Manag., 249, 109382
- Siddique, 2017, Textile wastewater treatment options: a critical review, 183
- Solmaz, 2006, Colour and COD removal from textile effluent by coagulation and advanced oxidation processes, Color. Technol., 122, 102, 10.1111/j.1478-4408.2006.00016.x · DOI
- Tomasini, 2019, Concentrate management for integrated MBR-RO process for wastewater reclamation and reuse-preliminary tests, J. Water Process Eng., 29, 100455, 10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.07.020 · DOI
- Üstün, 2007, Regeneration of industrial district wastewater using a combination of Fenton process and ion exchange—a case study, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 52, 425, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.05.006 · DOI
- Wang, 2015, Performance and fate of organics in a pilot MBR-NF for treating antibiotic production wastewater with recycling NF concentrate, Chemosphere, 121, 92, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.11.034 · DOI
- Wang, 2013, Blue and grey water footprint of textile industry in China, Water Sci. Technol., 68, 2485, 10.2166/wst.2013.532 · DOI
- Woo, 2016, Effect of powdered activated carbon on integrated submerged membrane bioreactor-nanofiltration process for wastewater reclamation, Bioresour. Technol., 210, 18, 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.023 · DOI
- Xie, 2016, Membrane-based processes for wastewater nutrient recovery: technology, challenges, and future direction, Water Res., 89, 210, 10.1016/j.watres.2015.11.045 · DOI
- Yaman, 2015, Anaerobic treatment of ozonated membrane concentrate, Desalin. Water Treat., 54, 2075, 10.1080/19443994.2014.933624 · DOI
- Yukseler, 2017, Analysis of the best available techniques for wastewaters from a denim manufacturing textile mill, J. Environ. Manag., 203, 1118
- Zhang, 2016, Sludge bio-drying: effective to reduce both antibiotic resistance genes and mobile genetic elements, Water Res., 106, 62, 10.1016/j.watres.2016.09.055 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Periyasamy, A. P. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16020495 · Cited by 652
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, K., Liu, Q., Fang, F., Wu, X., Xin, J., Sun, S., Wei, Y., Ruan, R., Chen, P., Wang, Y., & Addy, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-07
- Volume
- 261
- Pages
- 121067
- ISSN
- 0959-6526
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (51768043)
- China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M622106)
- Youth Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (20171BAB216037)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
