The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An evolutionary analysis of green finance sustainability based on multi-agent game
Abstract
Abstract Green finance development, which enhances innovation capacity and economic green transformation, helps people deal with the challenges of climate change, ecological crisis and energy security. It is important to achieve sustainable and balanced development for green finance. In this paper, an evolutionary game model is built with four participants, which include governments, financial institutions, enterprises, and consumers. Analogue simulation is applied to analyze the influences of each parameter on changes and development in green financial market. Equilibrium strategy and influence mechanism of participating entities are investigated. The result shows that: first, the integrity of the green financial system has a positive impact on sustainability developments and cleaner production. Second, it is critical to strengthen the government regulation, slash financial institutions and enterprises’ green finance production cost, increase the compensation for consumer pollution, and reduce the supervision cost of government. Accordingly, to integrity green financial system, governments, financial institutions, enterprises, and consumers needs participation and cooperation among each other.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dangelico, R. M., & Vocalelli, D. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.184 · Cited by 914
Zaidi, S. A. H., Zafar, M. W., Shahbaz, M., & Hou, F. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.210 · Cited by 795
Evolutionary game theory: Temporal and spatial effects beyond replicator dynamics
Roca, C. P., Cuesta, J. A., & Sánchez, A. (2009) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2009.08.001 · Cited by 766
The way to induce private participation in green finance and investment
Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., & Yoshino, N. (2019) · Finance Research Letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2019.04.016 · Cited by 745
The role of green finance in environmental protection: two aspects of market mechanism and policies
Wang, Y., & Zhi, Q. (2016) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2016.12.053 · Cited by 667
A bibliometric analysis on green finance: Current status, development, and future directions
Zhang, D., Zhang, Z., & Managi, S. (2019) · Finance Research Letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2019.02.003 · Cited by 665
Pal, R., Torstensson, H., & Mattila, H. (2014) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.02.031 · Cited by 589
He, L., Liu, R., Zhong, Z., Wang, D., & Xia, Y. (2019) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.059 · Cited by 587
He, L., Zhang, L., Zhong, Z., Wang, D., & Wang, F. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.119 · Cited by 583
Public appeal, environmental regulation and green investment: Evidence from China
Liao, X., & Shi, X. (. (2018) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.020 · Cited by 447
Cited by
Green finance, fintech and environmental protection: evidence from China
Muganyi, T., Yan, L., & Sun, H.-P. (2021) · Environmental Science and Ecotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.ese.2021.100107 · Cited by 626
Jin, Y., Gao, X., & Wang, M. (2021) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112254 · Cited by 242
Metadata
- Authors
- Cui, H., Wang, R., & Wang, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 269
- Pages
- 121799
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3024629478
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 32.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An evolutionary analysis of green finance sustainability based on multi-agent game. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121799
- The paper
- Cui, H., Wang, R., & Wang, H. (2020). An evolutionary analysis of green finance sustainability based on multi-agent game. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121799
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
