Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 298

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The determinants of public acceptance of autonomous vehicles: An innovation diffusion perspective

Yuen, Kum Fai, Wong, Yiik Diew, Ma, Fei, Wang, Xueqin·2020·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

Abstract The adoption of autonomous vehicles is reported to confer numerous benefits such as improved safety, comfort, resource (i.e. land and energy) use, and environmental protection to a society. Public acceptance is necessary for the widespread adoption of autonomous vehicles. Drawing on innovation diffusion, perceived value and trust theories, we developed a theoretical model to identify the latent factors influencing public acceptance of autonomous vehicles and examined their interrelationships. A survey questionnaire was designed and administered to 526 residents in Seoul, Republic of Korea. Thereafter, structural equation modelling was employed to analyse the survey data. The results reveal that the influence of the innovation diffusion attributes (i.e. relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability and observability) on public acceptance is fully mediated by the public’s perceived value of autonomous vehicles. Further, the effect of perceived value on public acceptance is partially mediated by the public’s trust in autonomous vehicles. This study differentiates from the literature by employing a theory-driven approach to explain autonomous vehicles acceptance. It applies three diverse research paradigms anchoring on innovation diffusion, customer utility and social psychology. In addition, it synthesises the theories and provides a coherent explanation of individuals’ cognition process that leads to acceptance. In sum, this study enriches existing theoretical research on the acceptance of autonomous vehicles, offers insights into understanding and managing technology–human interactions and implicates transport policies and practices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121904

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Cited by

See all 298

Metadata

Authors
Yuen, K. F., Wong, Y. D., Ma, F., & Wang, X.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
270
Pages
121904
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3021586725
Cited by
298
References
62
FWCI
12.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The determinants of public acceptance of autonomous vehicles: An innovation diffusion perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121904
The paper
Yuen, K. F., Wong, Y. D., Ma, F., & Wang, X. (2020). The determinants of public acceptance of autonomous vehicles: An innovation diffusion perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121904

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.