Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 578

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 112 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Arsenic removal technologies and future trends: A mini review

Alka, Sadiya, Shahir, Shafinaz, Ibrahim, Norahim, Ndejiko, Mohammed Jibrin, Vo, Dai-Viet N., Manan, Fazilah Abd·2021·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

Abstract Arsenic contamination has been widely recognized as one of the most consequential environmental pollutants due to its anthropogenic activities. Arsenic toxicity and remediation have become the focus of many institutions, including industries, environmental groups, and the general public. The treatment of arsenic contamination is of irrefutable significance to lower floras and faunas, humanity, and their living ecosystem. This review comprehensively examines different arsenic toxicities to the environment and their associated removal techniques. To begin with, the appraisal focuses on the general background of arsenic occurrences in the environment, its related health hazards, and measurement techniques. In addition, it also provides a comprehensive discussion of how arsenic impurities can be removed from the environment using diverse established and advanced technologies like adsorption, ion exchanges, electrokinetic processes, electrocoagulation, chemical precipitation, phytoremediation, nano phytoremediation, membrane technology, and phytobial remediation. Finally, the pros and cons of the remediation/removal methods are enumerated, as well as their principal ongoing accomplishments. The simplicity, low cost, and easy operational procedure of adsorption technique and use of novel functional materials such as graphite oxides, metal organic frameworks, carbon nanotubes and other new forms of functional materials are better future alternatives for arsenic removal.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123805

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 112 references

Cited by

See all 578

Metadata

Authors
Alka, S., Shahir, S., Ibrahim, N., Ndejiko, M. J., Vo, D.-V. N., & Manan, F. A.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
278
Pages
123805
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3081464235
Cited by
578
References
112
FWCI
26.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Arsenic removal technologies and future trends: A mini review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123805
The paper
Alka, S., Shahir, S., Ibrahim, N., Ndejiko, M. J., Vo, D.-V. N., & Manan, F. A. (2021). Arsenic removal technologies and future trends: A mini review. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123805

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.