Cited by 875Electrokinetic Soil Remediation TechniquesGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

Electrokinetic soil remediation - critical overview

Virkutyte, Jurate, Sillanpää, Mika, Latostenmaa, Petri·2002·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

In recent years, there has been increasing interest in finding new and innovative solutions for the efficient removal of contaminants from soils to solve groundwater, as well as soil, pollution. The objective of this review is to examine several alternative soil-remediating technologies, with respect to heavy metal remediation, pointing out their strengths and drawbacks and placing an emphasis on electrokinetic soil remediation technology. In addition, the review presents detailed theoretical aspects, design and operational considerations of electrokinetic soil-remediation variables, which are most important in efficient process application, as well as the advantages over other technologies and obstacles to overcome. The review discusses possibilities of removing selected heavy metal contaminants from clay and sandy soils, both saturated and unsaturated. It also gives selected efficiency rates for heavy metal removal, the dependence of these rates on soil variables, and operational conditions, as well as a cost-benefit analysis. Finally, several emerging in situ electrokinetic soil remediation technologies, such as Lasagna, Elektro-Klean, electrobioremediation, etc., are reviewed, and their advantages, disadvantages and possibilities in full-scale commercial applications are examined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0048-9697(01)01027-0

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For trace element contaminated soils, a variety of physicochemical remediation methods has been adopted, including solidification, electrokinetic soil remediation, encapsulation or soil destructive excavation, followed by washing, pyrolysis or disposal of contaminated soil.

    “With regard to trace element contaminated soils, a variety of physicochemical remediation methods has been adopted, including solidification, electrokinetic soil remediation, encapsulation or soil destructive excavation, followed by washing, pyrolysis or disposal of contaminated soil (Vegter, 2001;Virkutyte et al., 2002, Schwitzguébel et al., 2002).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Virkutyte, J., Sillanpää, M., & Latostenmaa, P.
Affiliations
University of Oulu (FI)
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-04
Volume
289
Issue
1-3
Pages
97-121
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038064619
Cited by
875
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 43
FWCI
15.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
heavy metal removal, soil contamination, groundwater remediation, clay soil, sandy soil, saturated-unsaturated soil, remediation efficiency, cost-benefit analysis, lasagna
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Electrochemistry, Environmental Pollution, Facility Design and Construction, Kinetics, Soil Pollutants, Technology, Metals, Heavy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review