The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vision of 3D printing with concrete — Technical, economic and environmental potentials
Abstract
A vision is presented on 3D printing with concrete, considering technical, economic and environmental aspects. Although several showcases of 3D printed concrete structures are available worldwide, many challenges remain at the technical and processing level. Currently available high-performance cement-based materials cannot be directly 3D printed, because of inadequate rheological and stiffening properties. Active rheology control (ARC) and active stiffening control (ASC) will provide new ways of extending the material palette for 3D printing applications. From an economic point of view, digitally manufactured concrete (DFC) will induce changes in the stakeholders as well as in the cost structure. Although it is currently too ambitious to quantitatively present the cost structure, DFC presents many potential opportunities to increase cost-effectiveness of construction processes. The environmental impact of 3D printing with concrete has to be seen in relation to the shape complexity of the structure. Implementing structural optimization as well as functional hybridization as design strategies allows the use of material only where is structurally or functionally needed. This design optimization increases shape complexity, but also reduces material use in DFC. As a result, it is expected that for structures with the same functionality, DFC will environmentally perform better over the entire service life in comparison with conventionally produced concrete structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019 · Cited by 8,727
Gibson, I., Rosen, D., & Stucker, B. (2015) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3 · Cited by 3,299
Developments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes
Lim, S., Buswell, R. A., Le, T. T., Austin, S. A., Gibb, A. G. F., & Thorpe, T. (2012) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.010 · Cited by 1,205
Cited by
Circular Digital Built Environment: An Emerging Framework
Çetin, S., De Wolf, C., & Bocken, N. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13116348 · Cited by 367
Environmental and economic assessment on 3D printed buildings with recycled concrete
Han, Y., Yang, Z., Ding, T., & Xiao, J. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123884 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- De Schutter, G., Lesage, K., Mechtcherine, V., Nerella, V. N., Habert, G., & Agusti-Juan, I.
- Venue
- Cement and Concrete Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 112
- Pages
- 25-36
- ISSN
- 0008-8846 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2886568155
- Cited by
- 1,072
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 55.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vision of 3D printing with concrete — Technical, economic and environmental potentials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.06.001
- The paper
- De Schutter, G., Lesage, K., Mechtcherine, V., Nerella, V. N., Habert, G., & Agusti-Juan, I. (2018). Vision of 3D printing with concrete — Technical, economic and environmental potentials. Cement and Concrete Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.06.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.