Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 425

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predictive modeling for sustainable high-performance concrete from industrial wastes: A comparison and optimization of models using ensemble learners

Farooq, Furqan, Ahmed, Wisal, Akbar, Arslan, Aslam, Fahid, Alyousef, Rayed·2021·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

Abstract The cementitious matrix of high-performance concrete (HPC) is highly complex, and ambiguity exists with its mix design. Compressive strength can vary with the composition and proportion of constituent material used. To predict the strength of such a complex matrix the use of robust and efficient machine learning approaches has become indispensable. This study uses machine intelligence algorithms with individual learners and ensemble learners (bagging, boosting) to predict the strength of (HPC) prepared with waste materials. This is done by employing Anaconda (Python). Ensemble learner bagging, adaptive boosting algorithm, and random forest as modified bagging algorithm are employed to construct strong ensemble learner by incorporating weak learner. The ensemble learners are used on individual learners or weak learners including support vector machine and decision tree through regression and multilayer perceptron neural network. The data consists of 1030 data samples in which eight parameters namely cement, water, sand, gravels, superplasticizer, concrete age, fly ash and granulated blast furnace slag were chosen to predict the output. Twenty bagging and boosting sub-models are trained on data and optimization was done to give maximum R2. The test data is also validated by means of K-Fold cross-validation using R2, MAE, and RMSE. Moreover, evaluation of ensemble models with individual one is also checked by statistical model performance index (e.g., MAE, MSE, RMSE, and RMLSE). The result suggested that the individual model response is enhanced by using the bagging and boosting learners. Overall, random forest and decision tree with bagging give the robust performance of the models with R2 = 0.92 with the least errors. On average, the ensemble model in machine learning would enhance the performance of the model.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126032

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

2 retracted

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 425

Metadata

Authors
Farooq, F., Ahmed, W., Akbar, A., Aslam, F., & Alyousef, R.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
292
Pages
126032
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3125850143
Cited by
425
References
33
FWCI
37.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictive modeling for sustainable high-performance concrete from industrial wastes: A comparison and optimization of models using ensemble learners. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126032
The paper
Farooq, F., Ahmed, W., Akbar, A., Aslam, F., & Alyousef, R. (2021). Predictive modeling for sustainable high-performance concrete from industrial wastes: A comparison and optimization of models using ensemble learners. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126032

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.