The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of Ownership Type on Environment–Strategy Linkage and Performance: Evidence from a Transitional Economy
Abstract
In this study I contend that the ownership type has a significant impact on the environment–strategy configurations amongst different firms in a transitional economy. The influence of ownership type on the environment–strategy configuration is tested, based on an analysis of surveys of 201 managers from four types of companies in China: state‐owned, collectively‐owned, privately‐owned, and foreign joint ventures. Results support the central notion that each ownership type exhibits a distinct environment–strategy configuration, which in turn has important performance implications for the firms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Several literature contributions explain that the owners of a firm affect its CG and strategic orientation (Shleifer, 1998; Connelly et al., 2010), and environmental strategy (Tan, 2002), and 'shape the underlying motivations of the firms accordingly which then might in fluence the implementation of sustainability ' (Ali Yawar and Kuula, 2021, p. 2).”
From Effective stakeholder governance in circular economy: Insights from Italian companies (2024) · cites this paper as Tan, 2002
Citations
Cites
Back-translation for cross-cultural research.
Brislin, R. W. (1970) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/135910457000100301 · Cited by 14,091
Dess, G. G., & Robinson, R. B. (1984) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250050306 · Cited by 3,337
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The impact of internal integration and relationship commitment on external integration
Zhao, X., Huo, B., Selen, W., & Yeung, J. H. Y. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.04.004 · Cited by 813
LAI, F., LI, D., WANG, Q., & ZHAO, X. (2008) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/j.1745-493x.2008.00064.x · Cited by 261
Effective stakeholder governance in circular economy: Insights from Italian companies
Minoja, M., & Romano, G. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143584 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Tan, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-05
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 333-354
- ISSN
- 0022-2380
- 1467-6486
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
